H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Miriam Oremans vs Katrina Adams H2H: 0-1

Katrina Adams holds a 1–0 lead over Miriam Oremans in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Katrina Adams leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Katrina Adams won the 1995 US Open round of 128 7-5 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Miriam Oremans
NED Age 54 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Katrina Adams
USA Age 58 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Katrina Adams #156 7-5 7-5 Miriam Oremans #38 Match data Aug 30, 1995* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Miriam Oremans #193 #25 585 1,808 162 182 47.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Katrina Adams #625 #67 199 1,607 55 114 32.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Miriam Oremans Katrina Adams
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1990 1–1 50.0% #185 1,519 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1991 3–9 25.0% #149 1,472 0 0 1987 1–3 25.0% #167 1,484 0 0
19 1992 8–12 40.0% #130 1,531 0 0 1988 10–15 40.0% #96 1,539 0 0
20 1993 28–20 58.3% #31 1,746 0 0 1989 14–25 35.9% #84 1,573 0 0
21 1994 14–18 43.8% #48 1,733 0 0 1990 1–11 8.3% #256 1,470 0 0
22 1995 19–18 51.4% #42 1,768 0 0 1991 7–7 50.0% #91 1,571 0 0
23 1996 17–18 48.6% #46 1,714 0 0 1992 6–15 28.6% #143 1,537 0 0
24 1997 15–15 50.0% #46 1,773 0 0 1993 4–10 28.6% #184 1,531 0 0
25 1998 13–16 44.8% #57 1,728 0 0 1994 2–7 22.2% #144 1,511 0 0
26 1999 8–17 32.0% #98 1,627 0 0 1995 3–8 27.3% #116 1,507 0 0
27 2000 17–13 56.7% #64 1,711 0 0 1996 7–10 41.2% #115 1,555 0 0
28 2001 13–15 46.4% #84 1,690 0 0 1997 0–2 0.0% #278 1,524 0 0
29 2002 6–10 37.5% #124 1,613 0 0 1998 0–1 0.0% #625 1,515 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Miriam Oremans Katrina Adams
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1990 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1991 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1987 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
19 1992 6 6 12 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1988 6 7 13 46.2% 0 5 5 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
20 1993 16 14 30 53.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1989 8 12 20 40.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 5 7 28.6%
21 1994 5 9 14 35.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 2 5 60.0% 1990 0 7 7 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
22 1995 7 8 15 46.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 1991 6 3 9 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1996 2 6 8 25.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 1992 4 5 9 44.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
24 1997 3 5 8 37.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 3 8 62.5% 1993 0 4 4 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0%
25 1998 1 6 7 14.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1994 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1999 2 7 9 22.2% 0 5 5 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 1995 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
27 2000 10 6 16 62.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1996 5 4 9 55.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
28 2001 5 8 13 38.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 1997 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2002 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1998 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 61 85 146 41.8% 28 43 71 39.4% 53 33 86 61.6% 20 21 41 48.8% — 34 51 85 40.0% 3 21 24 12.5% 13 20 33 39.4% 5 22 27 18.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Miriam Oremans Katrina Adams
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1990 1520 110.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.60 1–0 — — -0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1991 1472 101.8 — — — — +51 +51 — 29.6% -1.00 1–2 (33%) — — +0.66 1987 1485 104.6 — — — — — — — 25.0% -1.25 — — — +0.42
19 1992 1532 111.4 — — — — +48 — -24 38.6% -0.80 3–1 (75%) 0–1 — +0.45 1988 1540 107.3 — — — — +17 -104 +79 41.1% -0.98 3–3 (50%) 3–1 (75%) 104.1 +0.75
20 1993 1747 146.5 — — — — -74 -220 +26 59.1% +0.56 7–14 (33%) 4–6 (40%) 97.4 +0.65 1989 1573 119.5 — — — — +5 -143 +43 38.0% -0.89 9–7 (56%) 8–9 (47%) 105.7 +0.11
21 1994 1733 131.3 — — — — -44 -192 +24 46.8% -0.26 5–8 (38%) 5–7 (42%) 96.7 +0.41 1990 1471 103.4 — — — — -8 — +146 21.4% -1.64 0–4 (0%) 0–3 (0%) 92.7 +0.18
22 1995 1769 143.9 — — — — -10 -170 -22 50.0% +0.10 6–4 (60%) 6–7 (46%) 104.5 -0.91 1991 1572 124.7 — — — — -6 — — 44.1% -0.76 5–1 (83%) 5–1 (83%) 110.6 +0.43
23 1996 1714 134.9 — — — — -34 -67 +161 48.1% +0.09 5–4 (56%) 4–5 (44%) 100.2 +0.41 1992 1538 111.1 — — — — +21 -145 +41 29.5% -1.59 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) 96.5 +0.39
24 1997 1774 137.0 — — — — -31 -189 +117 47.9% +0.10 8–7 (53%) 2–7 (22%) 99.3 -1.65 1993 1531 120.1 — — — — -36 -85 +137 35.3% -1.24 2–4 (33%) 3–0 (100%) 102.7 -0.13
25 1998 1728 120.1 — — — — -72 -132 +210 41.5% -0.65 6–1 (86%) 5–7 (42%) 102.7 -0.25 1994 1512 124.6 — — — — +10 — — 30.4% -0.39 2–3 (40%) 1–3 (25%) 100.9 -0.56
26 1999 1628 117.1 — — — — -17 -126 +239 34.0% -1.19 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -1.78 1995 1508 111.9 — — — — +22 — — 30.8% -1.54 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.29
27 2000 1711 126.6 — — — — -8 -186 +166 53.5% +0.13 7–4 (64%) 4–3 (57%) 103.0 +0.23 1996 1555 119.5 — — — — +44 -140 +1 43.9% -0.63 3–4 (43%) 2–0 — -0.18
28 2001 1690 122.8 — — — — -15 -187 +242 43.3% -0.55 8–3 (73%) 3–3 (50%) 101.2 -1.04 1997 1525 99.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — +0.20
29 2002 1613 100.3 — — — — -1 -157 +280 40.0% -0.60 1–2 (33%) 0–4 (0%) 93.7 +0.42 1998 1515 98.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.10
Career — 1808 135.6 — — — — -26 -145 +138 46.8% -0.19 59–52 (53%) 34–51 (40%) 97.2 -0.73 — 1607 121.2 — — — — +9 -122 +69 35.5% -1.08 27–31 (47%) 24–22 (52%) 107.7 +1.07

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.