H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC

Miriam Oremans vs Kimiko Date Krumm H2H: 1-4

Kimiko Date Krumm holds a 4–1 lead over Miriam Oremans in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Kimiko Date Krumm leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Kimiko Date Krumm won the 1995 Strasbourg quarterfinal 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Miriam Oremans
NED Age 53 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 4
5 main draw meetings
Kimiko Date Krumm
Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 27, 1995* Strasbourg WTA 500 QF Clay Kimiko Date Krumm 6-2 6-4 Miriam Oremans #31 Match data
Mar 20, 1995* Key Biscayne WTA 1000 R32 Hard Kimiko Date Krumm 7-6 7-6 Miriam Oremans #39 Match data
Jan 14, 1995* Sydney WTA 500 QF Hard Kimiko Date Krumm 4-6 6-2 6-3 Miriam Oremans #47 Match data
Jun 18, 1993* Eastbourne WTA 250 R16 Grass Miriam Oremans #42 7-5 6-2 Kimiko Date Krumm Match data
Apr 10, 1993* Tokyo Japan Open WTA 250 QF Hard Kimiko Date Krumm 6-3 4-6 6-3 Miriam Oremans #56 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Miriam Oremans #193 #25 585 1,809 161 181 47.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Kimiko Date Krumm — — — 2,091 241 188 56.2% 0 1 0 3 4 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Miriam Oremans Kimiko Date Krumm
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1990 1–1 50.0% #185 1,519 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1991 3–9 25.0% #149 1,471 0 0 1989 6–5 54.5% — 1,562 0 0
19 1992 8–12 40.0% #130 1,532 0 0 1990 10–7 58.8% — 1,664 0 0
20 1993 28–20 58.3% #31 1,747 0 0 1991 12–11 52.2% — 1,725 0 0
21 1994 14–18 43.8% #48 1,733 0 0 1992 26–13 66.7% — 1,867 0 1
22 1995 19–18 51.4% #42 1,769 0 0 1993 25–11 69.4% — 1,956 0 2
23 1996 17–18 48.6% #46 1,714 0 0 1994 32–12 72.7% — 1,987 0 4
24 1997 15–15 50.0% #46 1,774 0 0 1995 39–12 76.5% — 2,029 0 5
25 1998 13–16 44.8% #57 1,729 0 0 1996 31–13 70.5% — 2,071 0 7
26 1999 8–17 32.0% #98 1,628 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 2000 16–12 57.1% #64 1,701 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 2001 13–15 46.4% #84 1,686 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2002 6–10 37.5% #124 1,611 0 0 — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% — 2,042 0 7
38 — — — — — — — 2009 6–11 35.3% — 1,841 0 8
39 — — — — — — — 2010 19–18 51.4% — 1,814 0 8
40 — — — — — — — 2011 7–24 22.6% — 1,567 0 8
41 — — — — — — — 2012 2–14 12.5% — 1,454 0 8
42 — — — — — — — 2013 12–15 44.4% — 1,575 0 8
43 — — — — — — — 2014 11–14 44.0% — 1,597 0 8
44 — — — — — — — 2015 3–6 33.3% — 1,574 0 8
46 — — — — — — — 2017 0–1 0.0% — 1,564 0 8