H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Miriam Oremans vs Kristie Boogert H2H: 3-2

Miriam Oremans holds a 3–2 lead over Kristie Boogert in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Miriam Oremans leads 2–1 on grass and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Miriam Oremans won the 1999 Libéma Open quarterfinal 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Miriam Oremans
NED Age 54 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main-draw meetings
Kristie Boogert
NED Age 52 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Miriam Oremans #49 6-4 6-3 Kristie Boogert #89 Match data Jun 19, 1999* QF Libéma Open Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass
Miriam Oremans #54 6-3 2-6 6-4 Kristie Boogert #86 Match data Jun 20, 1998* QF Libéma Open Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass
Kristie Boogert #95 7-5 6-2 Miriam Oremans #51 Match data Jun 11, 1998* R32 Birmingham WTA 250 Grass
Miriam Oremans #29 6-2 6-4 Kristie Boogert #97 Match data Oct 7, 1993* R32 Zurich Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Carpet
Kristie Boogert #181 7-6 6-2 Miriam Oremans #155 Match data Jul 23, 1992* R32 Prague Open Tier V → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Miriam Oremans #193 #25 585 1,808 162 182 47.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Kristie Boogert #564 #29 549 1,770 105 140 42.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Miriam Oremans Kristie Boogert
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1990 1–1 50.0% #185 1,519 0 0 1991 0–4 0.0% #231 1,469 0 0
18 1991 3–9 25.0% #149 1,472 0 0 1992 1–4 20.0% #168 1,450 0 0
19 1992 8–12 40.0% #130 1,531 0 0 1993 8–15 34.8% #111 1,495 0 0
20 1993 28–20 58.3% #31 1,746 0 0 1994 17–18 48.6% #53 1,591 0 0
21 1994 14–18 43.8% #48 1,733 0 0 1995 22–16 57.9% #35 1,751 0 0
22 1995 19–18 51.4% #42 1,768 0 0 1996 13–16 44.8% #55 1,711 0 0
23 1996 17–18 48.6% #46 1,714 0 0 1997 6–10 37.5% #82 1,679 0 0
24 1997 15–15 50.0% #46 1,773 0 0 1998 10–15 40.0% #83 1,614 0 0
25 1998 13–16 44.8% #57 1,728 0 0 1999 9–12 42.9% #94 1,602 0 0
26 1999 8–17 32.0% #98 1,627 0 0 2000 12–14 46.2% #66 1,625 0 0
27 2000 17–13 56.7% #64 1,711 0 0 2001 4–11 26.7% #146 1,532 0 0
28 2001 13–15 46.4% #84 1,690 0 0 2002 3–4 42.9% #141 1,538 0 0
29 2002 6–10 37.5% #124 1,613 0 0 2003 0–1 0.0% #314 1,531 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Miriam Oremans Kristie Boogert
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1990 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 3 3 0.0%
18 1991 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1992 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1992 6 6 12 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1993 4 4 8 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3%
20 1993 16 14 30 53.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1994 7 7 14 50.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6%
21 1994 5 9 14 35.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 2 5 60.0% 1995 12 8 20 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
22 1995 7 8 15 46.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 1996 5 5 10 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 4 6 33.3%
23 1996 2 6 8 25.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 1997 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0%
24 1997 3 5 8 37.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 3 8 62.5% 1998 1 6 7 14.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1998 1 6 7 14.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1999 1 4 5 20.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
26 1999 2 7 9 22.2% 0 5 5 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 2000 6 6 12 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
27 2000 10 6 16 62.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2001 2 4 6 33.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
28 2001 5 8 13 38.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2002 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
29 2002 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2003 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 61 85 146 41.8% 28 43 71 39.4% 53 33 86 61.6% 20 21 41 48.8% — 42 51 93 45.2% 27 45 72 37.5% 19 20 39 48.7% 17 24 41 41.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Miriam Oremans Kristie Boogert
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1990 1520 110.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.60 1–0 — — -0.11 1991 1470 105.5 — — — — +28 — — 11.1% -1.89 0–1 — — -0.25
18 1991 1472 101.8 — — — — +51 +51 — 29.6% -1.00 1–2 (33%) — — +0.66 1992 1451 100.6 — — — — — +76 — 27.3% -1.55 0–1 1–1 — +0.26
19 1992 1532 111.4 — — — — +48 — -24 38.6% -0.80 3–1 (75%) 0–1 — +0.45 1993 1495 122.3 — — — — +35 +34 +66 40.7% -0.55 2–6 (25%) 1–2 (33%) 96.0 +0.78
20 1993 1747 146.5 — — — — -74 -220 +26 59.1% +0.56 7–14 (33%) 4–6 (40%) 97.4 +0.65 1994 1592 135.8 — — — — +2 -42 +10 51.9% +0.12 3–6 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 99.5 +1.08
21 1994 1733 131.3 — — — — -44 -192 +24 46.8% -0.26 5–8 (38%) 5–7 (42%) 96.7 +0.41 1995 1752 145.9 — — — — -20 -150 -154 55.7% +0.67 7–5 (58%) 3–7 (30%) 103.9 -0.03
22 1995 1769 143.9 — — — — -10 -170 -22 50.0% +0.10 6–4 (60%) 6–7 (46%) 104.5 -0.91 1996 1712 132.3 — — — — -27 -121 -11 47.9% -0.10 5–8 (38%) 1–0 — -0.75
23 1996 1714 134.9 — — — — -34 -67 +161 48.1% +0.09 5–4 (56%) 4–5 (44%) 100.2 +0.41 1997 1679 128.2 — — — — +33 -110 0 38.9% -0.78 4–4 (50%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.78
24 1997 1774 137.0 — — — — -31 -189 +117 47.9% +0.10 8–7 (53%) 2–7 (22%) 99.3 -1.65 1998 1614 117.4 — — — — -22 -70 +161 47.4% +0.19 4–7 (36%) 1–3 (25%) 94.5 -0.21
25 1998 1728 120.1 — — — — -72 -132 +210 41.5% -0.65 6–1 (86%) 5–7 (42%) 102.7 -0.25 1999 1603 113.2 — — — — -45 -59 +158 44.7% -0.30 2–3 (40%) 8–2 (80%) 105.0 -0.49
26 1999 1628 117.1 — — — — -17 -126 +239 34.0% -1.19 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -1.78 2000 1625 123.8 — — — — -9 -63 +115 47.5% -0.33 4–5 (44%) 1–3 (25%) 99.6 -0.14
27 2000 1711 126.6 — — — — -8 -186 +166 53.5% +0.13 7–4 (64%) 4–3 (57%) 103.0 +0.23 2001 1533 108.3 — — — — +60 -52 +187 38.7% -0.71 1–4 (20%) 0–1 — +0.09
28 2001 1690 122.8 — — — — -15 -187 +242 43.3% -0.55 8–3 (73%) 3–3 (50%) 101.2 -1.04 2002 1538 108.4 — — — — +61 -69 — 46.7% -0.13 0–1 0–1 — 0.00
29 2002 1613 100.3 — — — — -1 -157 +280 40.0% -0.60 1–2 (33%) 0–4 (0%) 93.7 +0.42 2003 1532 103.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — -0.12
Career — 1808 135.6 — — — — -26 -145 +138 46.8% -0.19 59–52 (53%) 34–51 (40%) 97.2 -0.73 — 1770 133.9 — — — — +1 -62 +68 46.4% -0.14 32–52 (38%) 20–24 (45%) 96.0 -0.23

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.