H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Miriam Oremans vs Kristie Boogert H2H: 3-2

Miriam Oremans holds a 3–2 lead over Kristie Boogert in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Miriam Oremans leads 2–1 on grass and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Miriam Oremans won the 1999 S Hertogenbosch quarterfinal 6-4 6-3.

NED Age 53 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
3 2
5 main draw meetings
NED Age 52 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 14, 1999 S Hertogenbosch WTA 250 QF Grass Miriam Oremans #49 6-4 6-3 Kristie Boogert #89 Match data
Jun 15, 1998 S Hertogenbosch WTA 250 QF Grass Miriam Oremans #54 6-3 2-6 6-4 Kristie Boogert #86 Match data
Jun 11, 1998* Birmingham WTA 250 R32 Grass Kristie Boogert #95 7-5 6-2 Miriam Oremans #51 Match data
Oct 7, 1993* Zurich WTA 1000 R32 Carpet Miriam Oremans #29 6-2 6-4 Kristie Boogert #97 Match data
Jul 23, 1992* Prague WTA 250 R32 Clay Kristie Boogert #181 7-6 6-2 Miriam Oremans #155 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Miriam Oremans #193 #25 585 1,809 161 181 47.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Kristie Boogert #564 #29 549 1,770 104 139 42.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Miriam Oremans Kristie Boogert
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1990 1–1 50.0% #185 1,519 0 0 1991 0–4 0.0% #231 1,469 0 0
18 1991 3–9 25.0% #149 1,471 0 0 1992 1–4 20.0% #168 1,450 0 0
19 1992 8–12 40.0% #130 1,532 0 0 1993 8–15 34.8% #111 1,494 0 0
20 1993 28–20 58.3% #31 1,747 0 0 1994 17–18 48.6% #53 1,591 0 0
21 1994 14–18 43.8% #48 1,733 0 0 1995 22–16 57.9% #35 1,751 0 0
22 1995 19–18 51.4% #42 1,769 0 0 1996 13–16 44.8% #55 1,713 0 0
23 1996 17–18 48.6% #46 1,714 0 0 1997 6–10 37.5% #82 1,680 0 0
24 1997 15–15 50.0% #46 1,774 0 0 1998 10–15 40.0% #83 1,615 0 0
25 1998 13–16 44.8% #57 1,729 0 0 1999 9–12 42.9% #94 1,604 0 0
26 1999 8–17 32.0% #98 1,628 0 0 2000 11–13 45.8% #66 1,623 0 0
27 2000 16–12 57.1% #64 1,701 0 0 2001 4–11 26.7% #146 1,531 0 0
28 2001 13–15 46.4% #84 1,686 0 0 2002 3–4 42.9% #141 1,537 0 0
29 2002 6–10 37.5% #124 1,611 0 0 2003 0–1 0.0% #314 1,531 0 0