H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Miriam Oremans vs Leila Meskhi H2H: 0-1

Leila Meskhi holds a 1–0 lead over Miriam Oremans in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Leila Meskhi leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Leila Meskhi won the 1993 Key Biscayne round of 16 3-6 7-5 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Miriam Oremans
NED Age 54 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Leila Meskhi
GEO Age 58 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Leila Meskhi #27 3-6 7-5 6-0 Miriam Oremans #78 Match data Mar 16, 1993* R16 Key Biscayne Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Miriam Oremans #193 #25 585 1,808 162 182 47.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Leila Meskhi #903 #12 72 1,987 193 121 61.5% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Miriam Oremans Leila Meskhi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1990 1–1 50.0% #185 1,519 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1991 3–9 25.0% #149 1,472 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1992 8–12 40.0% #130 1,531 0 0 1987 11–7 61.1% #46 1,655 0 0
20 1993 28–20 58.3% #31 1,746 0 0 1988 18–18 50.0% #46 1,696 0 0
21 1994 14–18 43.8% #48 1,733 0 0 1989 21–14 60.0% #30 1,794 0 1
22 1995 19–18 51.4% #42 1,768 0 0 1990 38–14 73.1% #19 1,928 0 3
23 1996 17–18 48.6% #46 1,714 0 0 1991 30–14 68.2% #15 1,936 0 4
24 1997 15–15 50.0% #46 1,773 0 0 1992 26–16 61.9% #22 1,928 0 4
25 1998 13–16 44.8% #57 1,728 0 0 1993 22–17 56.4% #37 1,871 0 4
26 1999 8–17 32.0% #98 1,627 0 0 1994 22–15 59.5% #34 1,842 0 4
27 2000 17–13 56.7% #64 1,711 0 0 1995 5–2 71.4% #141 1,832 0 5
28 2001 13–15 46.4% #84 1,690 0 0 1996 0–4 0.0% #838 1,746 0 5
29 2002 6–10 37.5% #124 1,613 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Miriam Oremans Leila Meskhi
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1990 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1991 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1992 6 6 12 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1987 5 3 8 62.5% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
20 1993 16 14 30 53.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1988 15 12 27 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
21 1994 5 9 14 35.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 2 5 60.0% 1989 15 7 22 68.2% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
22 1995 7 8 15 46.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 1990 19 5 24 79.2% 12 7 19 63.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 0 5 100.0%
23 1996 2 6 8 25.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 1991 11 5 16 68.8% 14 6 20 70.0% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5%
24 1997 3 5 8 37.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 3 8 62.5% 1992 9 6 15 60.0% 12 6 18 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
25 1998 1 6 7 14.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1993 10 9 19 52.6% 8 5 13 61.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
26 1999 2 7 9 22.2% 0 5 5 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 1994 12 9 21 57.1% 8 4 12 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
27 2000 10 6 16 62.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1995 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2001 5 8 13 38.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 1996 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
29 2002 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 61 85 146 41.8% 28 43 71 39.4% 53 33 86 61.6% 20 21 41 48.8% — 101 58 159 63.5% 64 39 103 62.1% 3 8 11 27.3% 25 16 41 61.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Miriam Oremans Leila Meskhi
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1990 1520 110.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.60 1–0 — — -0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1991 1472 101.8 — — — — +51 +51 — 29.6% -1.00 1–2 (33%) — — +0.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1992 1532 111.4 — — — — +48 — -24 38.6% -0.80 3–1 (75%) 0–1 — +0.45 1987 1656 134.5 — — — — +27 -63 — 64.1% +1.05 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +0.80
20 1993 1747 146.5 — — — — -74 -220 +26 59.1% +0.56 7–14 (33%) 4–6 (40%) 97.4 +0.65 1988 1696 129.7 — — — — +32 — -166 49.4% -0.23 8–5 (62%) 3–6 (33%) 102.3 +0.65
21 1994 1733 131.3 — — — — -44 -192 +24 46.8% -0.26 5–8 (38%) 5–7 (42%) 96.7 +0.41 1989 1795 139.4 — — — — +11 -135 — 59.2% +0.57 3–3 (50%) 8–0 (100%) 108.0 -1.90
22 1995 1769 143.9 — — — — -10 -170 -22 50.0% +0.10 6–4 (60%) 6–7 (46%) 104.5 -0.91 1990 1928 151.0 — — — — +5 -112 -373 66.4% +1.63 10–3 (77%) 3–6 (33%) 102.3 +1.11
23 1996 1714 134.9 — — — — -34 -67 +161 48.1% +0.09 5–4 (56%) 4–5 (44%) 100.2 +0.41 1991 1937 151.3 — — — — -20 +20 — 62.6% +0.74 9–4 (69%) 5–5 (50%) 105.3 +0.25
24 1997 1774 137.0 — — — — -31 -189 +117 47.9% +0.10 8–7 (53%) 2–7 (22%) 99.3 -1.65 1992 1928 157.9 — — — — -26 +60 — 61.5% +1.16 7–4 (64%) 3–8 (27%) 96.9 -1.71
25 1998 1728 120.1 — — — — -72 -132 +210 41.5% -0.65 6–1 (86%) 5–7 (42%) 102.7 -0.25 1993 1872 148.4 — — — — -2 +90 — 55.3% +0.05 4–3 (57%) 2–2 (50%) 100.4 -1.93
26 1999 1628 117.1 — — — — -17 -126 +239 34.0% -1.19 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -1.78 1994 1843 148.6 — — — — -3 +108 — 55.2% +0.72 9–4 (69%) 3–3 (50%) 102.8 +0.52
27 2000 1711 126.6 — — — — -8 -186 +166 53.5% +0.13 7–4 (64%) 4–3 (57%) 103.0 +0.23 1995 1833 120.0 — — — — 0 — — 73.3% +1.87 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 98.8 +0.23
28 2001 1690 122.8 — — — — -15 -187 +242 43.3% -0.55 8–3 (73%) 3–3 (50%) 101.2 -1.04 1996 1747 89.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.63 — — — -0.21
29 2002 1613 100.3 — — — — -1 -157 +280 40.0% -0.60 1–2 (33%) 0–4 (0%) 93.7 +0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1808 135.6 — — — — -26 -145 +138 46.8% -0.19 59–52 (53%) 34–51 (40%) 97.2 -0.73 — 1987 152.8 — — — — +2 0 -270 58.9% +0.70 52–30 (63%) 28–33 (46%) 103.7 -0.70

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.