H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Miriam Oremans vs Linda Wild H2H: 1-1

Miriam Oremans and Linda Wild are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Linda Wild leads 1–0 on grass, while Miriam Oremans leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Miriam Oremans won the 1996 Key Biscayne round of 64 6-2 2-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Miriam Oremans
NED Age 54 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Linda Wild
USA Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Miriam Oremans #39 6-2 2-6 6-3 Linda Wild #55 Match data Mar 23, 1996* R64 Key Biscayne Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Linda Wild #43 6-3 6-3 Miriam Oremans #41 Match data Jun 17, 1994* R16 Eastbourne Open Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Miriam Oremans #193 #25 585 1,808 162 182 47.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Linda Wild #252 #23 823 1,815 135 146 48.0% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Miriam Oremans Linda Wild
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1990 1–1 50.0% #185 1,519 0 0 1972 0–1 0.0% — 1,492 0 0
1991 3–9 25.0% #149 1,472 0 0 1989 1–7 12.5% #155 1,457 0 0
1992 8–12 40.0% #130 1,531 0 0 1990 9–12 42.9% #86 1,554 0 0
1993 28–20 58.3% #31 1,746 0 0 1991 20–19 51.3% #41 1,720 0 0
1994 14–18 43.8% #48 1,733 0 0 1992 19–21 47.5% #49 1,732 0 0
1995 19–18 51.4% #42 1,768 0 0 1993 24–18 57.1% #45 1,764 0 2
1996 17–18 48.6% #46 1,714 0 0 1994 20–19 51.3% #49 1,740 0 2
1997 15–15 50.0% #46 1,773 0 0 1995 17–13 56.7% #58 1,758 0 4
1998 13–16 44.8% #57 1,728 0 0 1996 22–16 57.9% #29 1,809 0 5
1999 8–17 32.0% #98 1,627 0 0 1997 3–14 17.6% #223 1,625 0 5
2000 17–13 56.7% #64 1,711 0 0 1999 0–3 0.0% #191 1,566 0 5
2001 13–15 46.4% #84 1,690 0 0 2000 0–3 0.0% #252 1,540 0 5
2002 6–10 37.5% #124 1,613 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Miriam Oremans Linda Wild
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1990 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
1991 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1989 1 7 8 12.5% — — — — — — — — — — — —
1992 6 6 12 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1990 3 6 9 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
1993 16 14 30 53.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1991 8 9 17 47.1% 7 4 11 63.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
1994 5 9 14 35.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 2 5 60.0% 1992 8 10 18 44.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 6 2 8 75.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
1995 7 8 15 46.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 1993 15 9 24 62.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 8 2 10 80.0%
1996 2 6 8 25.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 1994 9 11 20 45.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 3 3 6 50.0%
1997 3 5 8 37.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 3 8 62.5% 1995 8 6 14 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 7 2 9 77.8%
1998 1 6 7 14.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1996 15 10 25 60.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
1999 2 7 9 22.2% 0 5 5 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 1997 3 8 11 27.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
2000 10 6 16 62.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1999 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
2001 5 8 13 38.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
2002 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 61 85 146 41.8% 28 43 71 39.4% 53 33 86 61.6% 20 21 41 48.8% Career 70 79 149 47.0% 19 30 49 38.8% 19 19 38 50.0% 27 18 45 60.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Miriam Oremans Linda Wild
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1990 1520 110.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.60 1–0 — — -0.11 1972 1493 98.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.09
1991 1472 101.8 — — — — +51 +51 — 29.6% -1.00 1–2 (33%) — — +0.66 1989 1457 103.4 — — — — +30 — — 17.6% -2.06 0–1 — — -0.09
1992 1532 111.4 — — — — +48 — -24 38.6% -0.80 3–1 (75%) 0–1 — +0.45 1990 1555 123.6 — — — — +1 -3 — 43.2% -0.52 3–1 (75%) 2–1 (67%) 104.4 -0.32
1993 1747 146.5 — — — — -74 -220 +26 59.1% +0.56 7–14 (33%) 4–6 (40%) 97.4 +0.65 1991 1721 134.6 — — — — -71 -49 -115 50.0% -0.26 8–4 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 107.4 -0.67
1994 1733 131.3 — — — — -44 -192 +24 46.8% -0.26 5–8 (38%) 5–7 (42%) 96.7 +0.41 1992 1733 139.7 — — — — -89 -75 +45 47.8% -0.05 6–6 (50%) 4–2 (67%) 103.9 -1.52
1995 1769 143.9 — — — — -10 -170 -22 50.0% +0.10 6–4 (60%) 6–7 (46%) 104.5 -0.91 1993 1765 132.8 — — — — +27 -174 -41 56.4% +0.47 7–5 (58%) 3–4 (43%) 99.5 +0.50
1996 1714 134.9 — — — — -34 -67 +161 48.1% +0.09 5–4 (56%) 4–5 (44%) 100.2 +0.41 1994 1741 132.8 — — — — -38 -164 +80 51.6% -0.05 8–9 (47%) 6–4 (60%) 98.6 -1.90
1997 1774 137.0 — — — — -31 -189 +117 47.9% +0.10 8–7 (53%) 2–7 (22%) 99.3 -1.65 1995 1758 128.9 — — — — +19 -201 +14 58.0% +0.57 3–6 (33%) 4–4 (50%) 96.1 +1.45
1998 1728 120.1 — — — — -72 -132 +210 41.5% -0.65 6–1 (86%) 5–7 (42%) 102.7 -0.25 1996 1810 144.4 — — — — +25 -227 -22 55.2% +0.55 7–6 (54%) 6–8 (43%) 101.6 +0.67
1999 1628 117.1 — — — — -17 -126 +239 34.0% -1.19 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -1.78 1997 1625 106.2 — — — — +96 -90 +72 25.6% -2.15 1–4 (20%) 2–3 (40%) 95.7 +0.19
2000 1711 126.6 — — — — -8 -186 +166 53.5% +0.13 7–4 (64%) 4–3 (57%) 103.0 +0.23 1999 1567 91.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.38
2001 1690 122.8 — — — — -15 -187 +242 43.3% -0.55 8–3 (73%) 3–3 (50%) 101.2 -1.04 2000 1541 109.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.42
2002 1613 100.3 — — — — -1 -157 +280 40.0% -0.60 1–2 (33%) 0–4 (0%) 93.7 +0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 1808 135.6 — — — — -26 -145 +138 46.8% -0.19 59–52 (53%) 34–51 (40%) 97.2 -0.73 Career 1816 137.3 — — — — -7 -98 +18 48.5% -0.14 43–42 (51%) 31–29 (52%) 102.2 -0.65

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.