H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Miriam Oremans vs Lori Mcneil H2H: 1-2

Lori Mcneil holds a 2–1 lead over Miriam Oremans in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while Lori Mcneil leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lori Mcneil won the 1997 Key Biscayne first round 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Miriam Oremans
NED Age 53 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Lori Mcneil
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 21, 1997* Key Biscayne WTA 1000 R128 Hard Lori Mcneil #105 6-4 6-4 Miriam Oremans #47 Match data
Jun 19, 1993* Eastbourne WTA 250 SF Grass Miriam Oremans #42 7-6 7-6 Lori Mcneil #19 Match data
Jun 11, 1992* Birmingham WTA 250 R32 Grass Lori Mcneil #25 6-2 6-1 Miriam Oremans #176 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Miriam Oremans #193 #25 585 1,809 161 181 47.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lori Mcneil #867 #9 303 2,032 377 273 58.0% 0 0 0 0 11 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Miriam Oremans Lori Mcneil
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0
17 1990 1–1 50.0% #185 1,519 0 0 1981 2–0 100.0% — 1,520 0 1
18 1991 3–9 25.0% #149 1,471 0 0 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,503 0 1
19 1992 8–12 40.0% #130 1,532 0 0 1983 6–5 54.5% — 1,569 0 1
20 1993 28–20 58.3% #31 1,747 0 0 1984 7–11 38.9% #97 1,609 0 1
21 1994 14–18 43.8% #48 1,733 0 0 1985 13–23 36.1% #93 1,587 0 1
22 1995 19–18 51.4% #42 1,769 0 0 1986 42–22 65.6% #14 1,884 0 3
23 1996 17–18 48.6% #46 1,714 0 0 1987 54–24 69.2% #11 2,017 0 3
24 1997 15–15 50.0% #46 1,774 0 0 1988 46–20 69.7% #13 1,904 0 5
25 1998 13–16 44.8% #57 1,729 0 0 1989 24–22 52.2% #36 1,760 0 6
26 1999 8–17 32.0% #98 1,628 0 0 1990 17–20 45.9% #52 1,696 0 6
27 2000 16–12 57.1% #64 1,701 0 0 1991 39–21 65.0% #19 1,870 0 8
28 2001 13–15 46.4% #84 1,686 0 0 1992 37–20 64.9% #15 1,962 0 9
29 2002 6–10 37.5% #124 1,611 0 0 1993 27–19 58.7% #25 1,898 0 10
30 — — — — — — — 1994 26–15 63.4% #17 1,871 0 11
31 — — — — — — — 1995 19–19 50.0% #34 1,804 0 11
32 — — — — — — — 1996 8–14 36.4% #83 1,726 0 11
33 — — — — — — — 1997 1–7 12.5% #301 1,655 0 11
34 — — — — — — — 1998 8–6 57.1% #91 1,717 0 11
35 — — — — — — — 1999 0–2 0.0% #869 1,669 0 11