H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Miriam Oremans vs Maja Zivec Skulj H2H: 1-0

Miriam Oremans holds a 1–0 lead over Maja Zivec Skulj in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Miriam Oremans leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Miriam Oremans won the 1992 Brisbane International round of 64 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Miriam Oremans
NED Age 54 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Maja Zivec Skulj
GER Age 52 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Miriam Oremans #149 6-3 6-4 Maja Zivec Skulj Match data Jan 1, 1992* R64 Brisbane International Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Miriam Oremans #193 #25 585 1,808 162 182 47.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Maja Zivec Skulj — — — 1,500 11 30 26.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Miriam Oremans Maja Zivec Skulj
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1989 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0
17 1990 1–1 50.0% #185 1,519 0 0 1991 0–3 0.0% — 1,448 0 0
18 1991 3–9 25.0% #149 1,472 0 0 1992 1–6 14.3% — 1,422 0 0
19 1992 8–12 40.0% #130 1,531 0 0 1993 5–12 29.4% — 1,451 0 0
20 1993 28–20 58.3% #31 1,746 0 0 1994 3–5 37.5% — 1,465 0 0
21 1994 14–18 43.8% #48 1,733 0 0 1995 1–2 33.3% — 1,464 0 0
22 1995 19–18 51.4% #42 1,768 0 0 1996 1–1 50.0% — 1,468 0 0
23 1996 17–18 48.6% #46 1,714 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 1997 15–15 50.0% #46 1,773 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 1998 13–16 44.8% #57 1,728 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 1999 8–17 32.0% #98 1,627 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 2000 17–13 56.7% #64 1,711 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 2001 13–15 46.4% #84 1,690 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2002 6–10 37.5% #124 1,613 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Miriam Oremans Maja Zivec Skulj
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1990 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1991 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1992 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
19 1992 6 6 12 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1993 1 3 4 25.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 1993 16 14 30 53.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1994 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
21 1994 5 9 14 35.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 2 5 60.0% 1995 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1995 7 8 15 46.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 1996 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
23 1996 2 6 8 25.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1997 3 5 8 37.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1998 1 6 7 14.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1999 2 7 9 22.2% 0 5 5 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2000 10 6 16 62.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2001 5 8 13 38.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2002 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 61 85 146 41.8% 28 43 71 39.4% 53 33 86 61.6% 20 21 41 48.8% — 4 12 16 25.0% 6 12 18 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Miriam Oremans Maja Zivec Skulj
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1485 97.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.13
17 1990 1520 110.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.60 1–0 — — -0.11 1991 1449 96.2 — — — — +44 — — 14.3% -2.43 0–1 — — +0.29
18 1991 1472 101.8 — — — — +51 +51 — 29.6% -1.00 1–2 (33%) — — +0.66 1992 1422 105.8 — — — — +34 +99 — 29.4% -1.41 0–3 (0%) — — +0.17
19 1992 1532 111.4 — — — — +48 — -24 38.6% -0.80 3–1 (75%) 0–1 — +0.45 1993 1452 117.4 — — — — 0 +81 — 39.5% -0.50 3–5 (38%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.36
20 1993 1747 146.5 — — — — -74 -220 +26 59.1% +0.56 7–14 (33%) 4–6 (40%) 97.4 +0.65 1994 1466 98.4 — — — — +5 — — 38.9% -1.56 1–1 2–0 — +0.12
21 1994 1733 131.3 — — — — -44 -192 +24 46.8% -0.26 5–8 (38%) 5–7 (42%) 96.7 +0.41 1995 1465 98.5 — — — — -6 — — 28.6% -1.28 1–0 — — -0.09
22 1995 1769 143.9 — — — — -10 -170 -22 50.0% +0.10 6–4 (60%) 6–7 (46%) 104.5 -0.91 1996 1469 103.4 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.50 — — — +0.24
23 1996 1714 134.9 — — — — -34 -67 +161 48.1% +0.09 5–4 (56%) 4–5 (44%) 100.2 +0.41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1997 1774 137.0 — — — — -31 -189 +117 47.9% +0.10 8–7 (53%) 2–7 (22%) 99.3 -1.65 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1998 1728 120.1 — — — — -72 -132 +210 41.5% -0.65 6–1 (86%) 5–7 (42%) 102.7 -0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1999 1628 117.1 — — — — -17 -126 +239 34.0% -1.19 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -1.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2000 1711 126.6 — — — — -8 -186 +166 53.5% +0.13 7–4 (64%) 4–3 (57%) 103.0 +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2001 1690 122.8 — — — — -15 -187 +242 43.3% -0.55 8–3 (73%) 3–3 (50%) 101.2 -1.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2002 1613 100.3 — — — — -1 -157 +280 40.0% -0.60 1–2 (33%) 0–4 (0%) 93.7 +0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1808 135.6 — — — — -26 -145 +138 46.8% -0.19 59–52 (53%) 34–51 (40%) 97.2 -0.73 — 1500 107.7 — — — — +13 +85 — 35.1% -1.06 5–11 (31%) 3–2 (60%) 98.7 +2.98

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.