H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Miriam Oremans vs Maria Strandlund Tomsvik H2H: 1-0

Miriam Oremans holds a 1–0 lead over Maria Strandlund Tomsvik in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Miriam Oremans leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Miriam Oremans won the 1995 Eastbourne Open round of 64 6-3 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Miriam Oremans
NED Age 54 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Maria Strandlund Tomsvik
SWE

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Miriam Oremans #39 6-3 6-0 Maria Strandlund Tomsvik Match data Jun 21, 1995* R64 Eastbourne Open Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Miriam Oremans #193 #25 585 1,808 162 182 47.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Maria Strandlund Tomsvik — — — 1,625 42 77 35.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Miriam Oremans Maria Strandlund Tomsvik
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1990 1–1 50.0% #185 1,519 0 0 1987 1–1 50.0% — 1,504 0 0
1991 3–9 25.0% #149 1,472 0 0 1988 6–7 46.2% — 1,578 0 0
1992 8–12 40.0% #130 1,531 0 0 1989 10–14 41.7% — 1,611 0 0
1993 28–20 58.3% #31 1,746 0 0 1990 7–16 30.4% — 1,588 0 0
1994 14–18 43.8% #48 1,733 0 0 1991 6–12 33.3% — 1,553 0 0
1995 19–18 51.4% #42 1,768 0 0 1992 0–3 0.0% — 1,520 0 0
1996 17–18 48.6% #46 1,714 0 0 1993 2–3 40.0% — 1,559 0 0
1997 15–15 50.0% #46 1,773 0 0 1994 0–2 0.0% — 1,546 0 0
1998 13–16 44.8% #57 1,728 0 0 1995 8–13 38.1% — 1,545 0 0
1999 8–17 32.0% #98 1,627 0 0 1996 2–5 28.6% — 1,526 0 0
2000 17–13 56.7% #64 1,711 0 0 1997 0–1 0.0% — 1,515 0 0
2001 13–15 46.4% #84 1,690 0 0 — — — — — — —
2002 6–10 37.5% #124 1,613 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Miriam Oremans Maria Strandlund Tomsvik
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1990 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
1991 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1988 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
1992 6 6 12 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1989 4 6 10 40.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
1993 16 14 30 53.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1990 5 9 14 35.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
1994 5 9 14 35.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 2 5 60.0% 1991 2 5 7 28.6% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
1995 7 8 15 46.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 1992 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
1996 2 6 8 25.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 1993 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
1997 3 5 8 37.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 3 8 62.5% 1994 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
1998 1 6 7 14.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1995 4 3 7 57.1% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
1999 2 7 9 22.2% 0 5 5 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
2000 10 6 16 62.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1997 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
2001 5 8 13 38.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2002 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 61 85 146 41.8% 28 43 71 39.4% 53 33 86 61.6% 20 21 41 48.8% Career 19 28 47 40.4% 14 30 44 31.8% 6 9 15 40.0% 3 10 13 23.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Miriam Oremans Maria Strandlund Tomsvik
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1990 1520 110.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.60 1–0 — — -0.11 1987 1504 102.8 — — — — — — — 60.0% +1.20 0–1 — — +0.37
1991 1472 101.8 — — — — +51 +51 — 29.6% -1.00 1–2 (33%) — — +0.66 1988 1578 125.8 — — — — +10 -8 — 45.5% -0.15 4–3 (57%) 1–2 (33%) 102.9 +0.45
1992 1532 111.4 — — — — +48 — -24 38.6% -0.80 3–1 (75%) 0–1 — +0.45 1989 1612 115.4 — — — — -1 -33 — 44.3% -0.85 6–7 (46%) 1–1 — +0.30
1993 1747 146.5 — — — — -74 -220 +26 59.1% +0.56 7–14 (33%) 4–6 (40%) 97.4 +0.65 1990 1589 112.6 — — — — +13 -55 — 32.7% -1.00 5–3 (63%) 0–5 (0%) 99.0 -0.92
1994 1733 131.3 — — — — -44 -192 +24 46.8% -0.26 5–8 (38%) 5–7 (42%) 96.7 +0.41 1991 1554 113.6 — — — — -13 -34 +68 35.7% -0.98 3–3 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 99.8 -0.11
1995 1769 143.9 — — — — -10 -170 -22 50.0% +0.10 6–4 (60%) 6–7 (46%) 104.5 -0.91 1992 1520 104.3 — — — — — — — 14.3% -2.57 0–1 — — -0.32
1996 1714 134.9 — — — — -34 -67 +161 48.1% +0.09 5–4 (56%) 4–5 (44%) 100.2 +0.41 1993 1560 135.6 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.42 2–0 0–1 — -0.82
1997 1774 137.0 — — — — -31 -189 +117 47.9% +0.10 8–7 (53%) 2–7 (22%) 99.3 -1.65 1994 1546 102.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.25 — 0–2 — -0.30
1998 1728 120.1 — — — — -72 -132 +210 41.5% -0.65 6–1 (86%) 5–7 (42%) 102.7 -0.25 1995 1545 114.4 — — — — +8 -11 +27 40.8% -0.86 3–4 (43%) 1–1 — -0.97
1999 1628 117.1 — — — — -17 -126 +239 34.0% -1.19 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -1.78 1996 1527 113.8 — — — — +25 — — 33.3% -0.60 0–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.67
2000 1711 126.6 — — — — -8 -186 +166 53.5% +0.13 7–4 (64%) 4–3 (57%) 103.0 +0.23 1997 1515 100.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.67 0–1 1–0 — +0.13
2001 1690 122.8 — — — — -15 -187 +242 43.3% -0.55 8–3 (73%) 3–3 (50%) 101.2 -1.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2002 1613 100.3 — — — — -1 -157 +280 40.0% -0.60 1–2 (33%) 0–4 (0%) 93.7 +0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 1808 135.6 — — — — -26 -145 +138 46.8% -0.19 59–52 (53%) 34–51 (40%) 97.2 -0.73 Career 1625 123.4 — — — — +6 -29 +45 38.2% -0.87 23–24 (49%) 6–16 (27%) 97.8 -1.28

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.