H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Miriam Oremans vs Maria Strandlund Tomsvik H2H: 1-0
Miriam Oremans holds a 1–0 lead over Maria Strandlund Tomsvik in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Miriam Oremans leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Miriam Oremans won the 1995 Eastbourne second round 6-3 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 53
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 21, 1995* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Miriam Oremans | 6-3 6-0 | Maria Strandlund Tomsvik | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Miriam Oremans | #193 | #25 | 585 | 1,809 | 161 | 181 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Maria Strandlund Tomsvik | — | — | — | 1,626 | 42 | 77 | 35.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Miriam Oremans | Maria Strandlund Tomsvik | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1990 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #185 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #149 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #130 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 10–14 | 41.7% | — | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #31 | 1,747 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 7–16 | 30.4% | — | 1,589 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #48 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #42 | 1,769 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #46 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,774 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #57 | 1,729 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 8–13 | 38.1% | — | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #98 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 16–12 | 57.1% | #64 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #84 | 1,686 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2002 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #124 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |