H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Miriam Oremans vs Marianne Werdel Witmeyer H2H: 2-0
Miriam Oremans holds a 2–0 lead over Marianne Werdel Witmeyer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Miriam Oremans leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Miriam Oremans won the 1997 Hope Island third round 4-6 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 53
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 2, 1997* | Hope Island | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Miriam Oremans | 4-6 6-4 6-4 | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | Match data |
| Feb 25, 1993* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Miriam Oremans | 6-0 1-6 6-3 | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Miriam Oremans | #193 | #25 | 585 | 1,809 | 161 | 181 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | — | — | — | 1,849 | 181 | 203 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Miriam Oremans | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1990 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #185 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #149 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #130 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 1 |
| 1993 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #31 | 1,747 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 13–10 | 56.5% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 1 |
| 1994 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #48 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 10–17 | 37.0% | — | 1,659 | 0 | 1 |
| 1995 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #42 | 1,769 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 11–20 | 35.5% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 1 |
| 1996 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #46 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 1 |
| 1997 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,774 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 18–18 | 50.0% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 1 |
| 1998 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #57 | 1,729 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 21–19 | 52.5% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 1 |
| 1999 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #98 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 2000 | 16–12 | 57.1% | #64 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 21–18 | 53.8% | — | 1,748 | 0 | 1 |
| 2001 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #84 | 1,686 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 1 |
| 2002 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #124 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 20–18 | 52.6% | — | 1,780 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 8–18 | 30.8% | — | 1,663 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |