H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Miriam Oremans vs Martina Navratilova H2H: 1-2

Martina Navratilova holds a 2–1 lead over Miriam Oremans in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Martina Navratilova leads 1–0 on carpet, while Miriam Oremans leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Miriam Oremans won the 1994 Roland Garros first round 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Miriam Oremans
NED Age 53 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Martina Navratilova
USA Age 69 Left-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 25, 1994* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Miriam Oremans #54 6-4 6-4 Martina Navratilova #4 Match data
Oct 9, 1993* Zurich WTA 1000 QF Carpet Martina Navratilova #3 6-2 6-2 Miriam Oremans #29 Match data
Jun 20, 1993* Eastbourne WTA 250 F Grass Martina Navratilova #4 2-6 6-2 6-3 Miriam Oremans #42 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Miriam Oremans #193 #25 585 1,809 161 181 47.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Martina Navratilova #395 #1 290 2,664 1,427 227 86.3% 18 8 8 15 120 168

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Miriam Oremans Martina Navratilova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1972 1–1 50.0% — 1,498 0 1
16 — — — — — — — 1973 20–17 54.1% — 1,761 0 2
17 1990 1–1 50.0% #185 1,519 0 0 1974 39–20 66.1% — 1,975 0 4
18 1991 3–9 25.0% #149 1,471 0 0 1975 81–21 79.4% — 2,218 0 7
19 1992 8–12 40.0% #130 1,532 0 0 1976 41–16 71.9% — 2,153 0 9
20 1993 28–20 58.3% #31 1,747 0 0 1977 67–15 81.7% — 2,243 0 15
21 1994 14–18 43.8% #48 1,733 0 0 1978 78–9 89.7% — 2,420 1 26
22 1995 19–18 51.4% #42 1,769 0 0 1979 91–12 88.3% — 2,428 2 36
23 1996 17–18 48.6% #46 1,714 0 0 1980 86–12 87.8% — 2,344 2 47
24 1997 15–15 50.0% #46 1,774 0 0 1981 90–15 85.7% — 2,407 3 57
25 1998 13–16 44.8% #57 1,729 0 0 1982 85–3 96.6% — 2,521 5 72
26 1999 8–17 32.0% #98 1,628 0 0 1983 84–1 98.8% — 2,622 8 88
27 2000 16–12 57.1% #64 1,701 0 0 1984 78–2 97.5% #1 2,633 11 101
28 2001 13–15 46.4% #84 1,686 0 0 1985 84–5 94.4% #1 2,583 13 113
29 2002 6–10 37.5% #124 1,611 0 0 1986 84–3 96.6% #1 2,626 15 126
30 — — — — — — — 1987 56–8 87.5% #2 2,523 17 130
31 — — — — — — — 1988 70–7 90.9% #2 2,452 17 139
32 — — — — — — — 1989 68–8 89.5% #2 2,393 17 147
33 — — — — — — — 1990 52–7 88.1% #3 2,306 18 153
34 — — — — — — — 1991 53–9 85.5% #4 2,316 18 158
35 — — — — — — — 1992 38–8 82.6% #5 2,326 18 162
36 — — — — — — — 1993 46–8 85.2% #3 2,264 18 167
37 — — — — — — — 1994 33–14 70.2% #8 2,073 18 168
45 — — — — — — — 2002 1–1 50.0% — 2,051 18 168
47 — — — — — — — 2004 1–4 20.0% #388 1,940 18 168
48 — — — — — — — 2005 0–1 0.0% #395 1,910 18 168