H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Miriam Oremans vs Martina Navratilova H2H: 1-2

Martina Navratilova holds a 2–1 lead over Miriam Oremans in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Martina Navratilova leads 1–0 on carpet, while Miriam Oremans leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Miriam Oremans won the 1994 Roland Garros round of 128 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Miriam Oremans
NED Age 54 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main-draw meetings
Martina Navratilova
USA Age 69 Left-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Miriam Oremans #54 6-4 6-4 Martina Navratilova #4 Match data May 25, 1994* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Martina Navratilova #3 6-2 6-2 Miriam Oremans #29 Match data Oct 9, 1993* QF Zurich Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Carpet
Martina Navratilova #4 2-6 6-2 6-3 Miriam Oremans #42 Match data Jun 20, 1993* F Eastbourne Open Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Miriam Oremans #193 #25 585 1,808 162 182 47.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Martina Navratilova #395 #1 290 2,680 1,419 228 86.2% 18 3 8 38 100 167

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Miriam Oremans Martina Navratilova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1972 0–1 0.0% — 1,483 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1973 17–17 50.0% — 1,741 0 0
17 1990 1–1 50.0% #185 1,519 0 0 1974 34–20 63.0% — 1,960 0 1
18 1991 3–9 25.0% #149 1,472 0 0 1975 82–22 78.8% #3 2,246 0 5
19 1992 8–12 40.0% #130 1,531 0 0 1976 41–16 71.9% #4 2,166 0 7
20 1993 28–20 58.3% #31 1,746 0 0 1977 67–15 81.7% #3 2,250 0 13
21 1994 14–18 43.8% #48 1,733 0 0 1978 78–9 89.7% #1 2,433 1 24
22 1995 19–18 51.4% #42 1,768 0 0 1979 91–12 88.3% #1 2,439 2 34
23 1996 17–18 48.6% #46 1,714 0 0 1980 86–12 87.8% #3 2,366 2 45
24 1997 15–15 50.0% #46 1,773 0 0 1981 90–15 85.7% #3 2,423 3 55
25 1998 13–16 44.8% #57 1,728 0 0 1982 85–3 96.6% #1 2,538 5 70
26 1999 8–17 32.0% #98 1,627 0 0 1983 84–1 98.8% #1 2,638 8 86
27 2000 17–13 56.7% #64 1,711 0 0 1984 78–2 97.5% #1 2,649 11 99
28 2001 13–15 46.4% #84 1,690 0 0 1985 84–5 94.4% #1 2,595 13 111
29 2002 6–10 37.5% #124 1,613 0 0 1986 84–3 96.6% #1 2,633 15 125
30 — — — — — — — 1987 56–8 87.5% #2 2,527 17 129
31 — — — — — — — 1988 70–7 90.9% #2 2,455 17 138
32 — — — — — — — 1989 68–8 89.5% #2 2,425 17 146
33 — — — — — — — 1990 52–7 88.1% #3 2,322 18 152
34 — — — — — — — 1991 53–9 85.5% #4 2,321 18 157
35 — — — — — — — 1992 38–8 82.6% #5 2,328 18 161
36 — — — — — — — 1993 46–8 85.2% #3 2,265 18 166
37 — — — — — — — 1994 33–14 70.2% #8 2,073 18 167
45 — — — — — — — 2002 1–1 50.0% — 2,051 18 167
47 — — — — — — — 2004 1–4 20.0% #388 1,940 18 167
48 — — — — — — — 2005 0–1 0.0% #395 1,910 18 167

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Miriam Oremans Martina Navratilova
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 0 2 2 0.0% 15 11 26 57.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
17 1990 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1 3 4 25.0% 16 4 20 80.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 7 7 14 50.0%
18 1991 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1975 25 7 32 78.1% 25 7 32 78.1% 9 3 12 75.0% 23 5 28 82.1%
19 1992 6 6 12 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1976 10 4 14 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 14 2 16 87.5% 16 8 24 66.7%
20 1993 16 14 30 53.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1977 17 6 23 73.9% 10 1 11 90.9% 9 3 12 75.0% 31 5 36 86.1%
21 1994 5 9 14 35.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 2 5 60.0% 1978 20 4 24 83.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 13 0 13 100.0% 43 4 47 91.5%
22 1995 7 8 15 46.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 1979 14 3 17 82.4% 4 1 5 80.0% 14 2 16 87.5% 59 6 65 90.8%
23 1996 2 6 8 25.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 1980 18 5 23 78.3% 9 0 9 100.0% 12 4 16 75.0% 47 3 50 94.0%
24 1997 3 5 8 37.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 3 8 62.5% 1981 14 2 16 87.5% 11 3 14 78.6% 21 4 25 84.0% 44 6 50 88.0%
25 1998 1 6 7 14.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1982 12 1 13 92.3% 15 0 15 100.0% 21 1 22 95.5% 37 1 38 97.4%
26 1999 2 7 9 22.2% 0 5 5 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 1983 22 0 22 100.0% 12 1 13 92.3% 19 0 19 100.0% 31 0 31 100.0%
27 2000 10 6 16 62.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1984 17 0 17 100.0% 16 0 16 100.0% 27 1 28 96.4% 18 1 19 94.7%
28 2001 5 8 13 38.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 1985 24 3 27 88.9% 14 1 15 93.3% 29 0 29 100.0% 17 1 18 94.4%
29 2002 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1986 17 0 17 100.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 13 0 13 100.0% 44 1 45 97.8%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 15 2 17 88.2% 13 3 16 81.3% 17 2 19 89.5% 11 1 12 91.7%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 26 3 29 89.7% 17 2 19 89.5% 12 1 13 92.3% 15 1 16 93.8%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 28 3 31 90.3% 6 2 8 75.0% 17 1 18 94.4% 17 2 19 89.5%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 12 2 14 85.7% 14 3 17 82.4% 13 0 13 100.0% 13 2 15 86.7%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 15 2 17 88.2% 6 3 9 66.7% 15 1 16 93.8% 17 3 20 85.0%
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 14 1 15 93.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 17 4 21 81.0%
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 15 2 17 88.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 12 2 14 85.7% 17 3 20 85.0%
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 8 2 10 80.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 8 2 10 80.0% 10 5 15 66.7%
45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 61 85 146 41.8% 28 43 71 39.4% 53 33 86 61.6% 20 21 41 48.8% — 344 57 401 85.8% 226 58 284 79.6% 315 42 357 88.2% 534 71 605 88.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Miriam Oremans Martina Navratilova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 1483 98.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — +0.21
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 1742 151.2 — — — — -211 +47 -161 52.0% +0.01 4–5 (44%) 2–3 (40%) 100.5 -2.70
17 1990 1520 110.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.60 1–0 — — -0.11 1974 1961 159.8 — — — — -284 +114 -237 60.3% +0.74 12–11 (52%) 11–4 (73%) 109.9 -9.92
18 1991 1472 101.8 — — — — +51 +51 — 29.6% -1.00 1–2 (33%) — — +0.66 1975 2247 173.0 — — — — +6 -18 -381 75.8% +1.74 14–7 (67%) 11–2 (85%) 111.4 -10.84
19 1992 1532 111.4 — — — — +48 — -24 38.6% -0.80 3–1 (75%) 0–1 — +0.45 1976 2166 161.0 — — — — +4 -34 -73 70.4% +1.38 11–6 (65%) 4–1 (80%) 102.0 -6.41
20 1993 1747 146.5 — — — — -74 -220 +26 59.1% +0.56 7–14 (33%) 4–6 (40%) 97.4 +0.65 1977 2251 173.4 — — — — +102 -69 -110 79.0% +2.21 7–7 (50%) 10–5 (67%) 100.7 -8.80
21 1994 1733 131.3 — — — — -44 -192 +24 46.8% -0.26 5–8 (38%) 5–7 (42%) 96.7 +0.41 1978 2434 178.4 — — — — +35 -307 -96 84.1% +2.77 15–2 (88%) 5–10 (33%) 104.2 -6.56
22 1995 1769 143.9 — — — — -10 -170 -22 50.0% +0.10 6–4 (60%) 6–7 (46%) 104.5 -0.91 1979 2440 178.7 — — — — +37 -222 -63 84.3% +2.59 11–3 (79%) 7–2 (78%) 102.8 -4.63
23 1996 1714 134.9 — — — — -34 -67 +161 48.1% +0.09 5–4 (56%) 4–5 (44%) 100.2 +0.41 1980 2367 177.3 — — — — +175 -69 -15 82.0% +2.50 17–6 (74%) 13–3 (81%) 101.9 -4.48
24 1997 1774 137.0 — — — — -31 -189 +117 47.9% +0.10 8–7 (53%) 2–7 (22%) 99.3 -1.65 1981 2423 179.0 — — — — +104 -134 -12 80.4% +2.47 16–11 (59%) 7–9 (44%) 93.9 -8.43
25 1998 1728 120.1 — — — — -72 -132 +210 41.5% -0.65 6–1 (86%) 5–7 (42%) 102.7 -0.25 1982 2539 179.0 — — — — +107 -124 -87 90.0% +3.08 13–3 (81%) 12–4 (75%) 104.0 -2.79
26 1999 1628 117.1 — — — — -17 -126 +239 34.0% -1.19 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -1.78 1983 2638 183.0 — — — — +115 -236 -76 94.9% +3.91 7–1 (88%) 5–0 (100%) 105.4 -2.30
27 2000 1711 126.6 — — — — -8 -186 +166 53.5% +0.13 7–4 (64%) 4–3 (57%) 103.0 +0.23 1984 2649 177.2 — — — — +103 -152 -65 94.0% +3.48 7–2 (78%) 7–1 (88%) 103.4 -1.21
28 2001 1690 122.8 — — — — -15 -187 +242 43.3% -0.55 8–3 (73%) 3–3 (50%) 101.2 -1.04 1985 2595 177.6 — — — — +45 -39 +99 90.1% +3.06 10–3 (77%) 9–4 (69%) 101.4 -1.95
29 2002 1613 100.3 — — — — -1 -157 +280 40.0% -0.60 1–2 (33%) 0–4 (0%) 93.7 +0.42 1986 2634 182.2 — — — — +69 -119 +83 91.0% +3.03 12–2 (86%) 14–2 (88%) 107.4 -2.24
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 2527 176.8 — — — — +116 -43 +190 85.7% +2.83 3–2 (60%) 7–4 (64%) 99.6 -3.06
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 2456 176.7 — — — — +130 +15 +223 85.5% +2.93 10–3 (77%) 3–5 (38%) 94.4 -2.10
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 2425 176.2 — — — — +96 -16 +175 86.5% +2.82 7–4 (64%) 9–1 (90%) 98.0 -2.04
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 2323 174.5 — — — — +99 +62 +414 84.5% +2.88 6–5 (55%) 5–3 (63%) 94.9 -0.34
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 2322 172.3 — — — — +106 +3 +333 79.3% +2.24 10–4 (71%) 9–5 (64%) 101.2 -1.85
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 2328 175.0 — — — — +97 — +412 77.5% +2.13 6–6 (50%) 10–0 (100%) 98.4 -1.40
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 2265 172.8 — — — — +97 -12 +351 79.2% +2.30 9–3 (75%) 5–2 (71%) 100.2 -1.33
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 2074 161.5 — — — — +133 +37 +402 64.9% +1.41 12–8 (60%) 5–4 (56%) 92.1 -1.09
45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 2052 102.7 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.50 1–1 — — -0.01
47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1941 100.2 +0.20 -0.26 1.142 52.8% — +91 — 33.3% -0.50 0–2 — — +0.11
48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1911 97.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.08
Career — 1808 135.6 — — — — -26 -145 +138 46.8% -0.19 59–52 (53%) 34–51 (40%) 97.2 -0.73 — 2680 180.0 +0.20 -0.26 1.142 52.8% +78 -38 +49 81.7% +2.48 220–109 (67%) 170–74 (70%) 105.4 -5.25

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.