H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Miriam Oremans vs Mary Joe Fernandez H2H: 0-3

Mary Joe Fernandez holds a 3–0 lead over Miriam Oremans in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Mary Joe Fernandez leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Mary Joe Fernandez won the 1999 US Open first round 3-6 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Miriam Oremans
NED Age 53 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 – 3
3 main draw meetings
Mary Joe Fernandez
Age 54 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 1, 1999* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Mary Joe Fernandez #38 3-6 6-4 6-2 Miriam Oremans #82 Match data
Jul 2, 1995* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Mary Joe Fernandez #14 6-1 6-2 Miriam Oremans #42 Match data
Aug 30, 1990* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Mary Joe Fernandez #8 6-4 6-1 Miriam Oremans #219 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Miriam Oremans #193 #25 585 1,809 161 181 47.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mary Joe Fernandez #136 #4 2,114 2,191 409 192 68.1% 0 3 0 1 3 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Miriam Oremans Mary Joe Fernandez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
12 — — — — — — — 1984 0–2 0.0% — 1,475 0 0
13 — — — — — — — 1985 5–6 45.5% #99 1,554 0 0
14 — — — — — — — 1986 18–14 56.2% #27 1,764 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1987 24–14 63.2% #20 1,895 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1988 22–11 66.7% #15 1,922 0 0
17 1990 1–1 50.0% #185 1,519 0 0 1989 32–15 68.1% #12 1,977 0 0
18 1991 3–9 25.0% #149 1,471 0 0 1990 40–10 80.0% #4 2,123 0 2
19 1992 8–12 40.0% #130 1,532 0 0 1991 47–18 72.3% #8 2,062 0 2
20 1993 28–20 58.3% #31 1,747 0 0 1992 47–16 74.6% #6 2,108 0 2
21 1994 14–18 43.8% #48 1,733 0 0 1993 34–13 72.3% #7 2,054 0 3
22 1995 19–18 51.4% #42 1,769 0 0 1994 21–9 70.0% #14 1,975 0 4
23 1996 17–18 48.6% #46 1,714 0 0 1995 29–11 72.5% #8 2,038 0 6
24 1997 15–15 50.0% #46 1,774 0 0 1996 26–15 63.4% #16 1,926 0 6
25 1998 13–16 44.8% #57 1,729 0 0 1997 39–16 70.9% #10 1,987 0 7
26 1999 8–17 32.0% #98 1,628 0 0 1998 8–8 50.0% #77 1,932 0 7
27 2000 16–12 57.1% #64 1,701 0 0 1999 17–13 56.7% #38 1,890 0 7
28 2001 13–15 46.4% #84 1,686 0 0 2000 0–1 0.0% #136 1,869 0 7
29 2002 6–10 37.5% #124 1,611 0 0 — — — — — — —