H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Miriam Oremans vs Meike Babel H2H: 2-0

Miriam Oremans holds a 2–0 lead over Meike Babel in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Miriam Oremans leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Miriam Oremans won the 2000 Bratislava round of 32 6-0 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Miriam Oremans
NED Age 54 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Meike Babel
GER Age 51 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Miriam Oremans #73 6-0 6-0 Meike Babel #428 Match data Oct 26, 2000* R32 Bratislava Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Miriam Oremans #59 7-5 6-1 Meike Babel #145 Match data Aug 28, 1997* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Miriam Oremans #193 #25 585 1,808 162 182 47.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Meike Babel #446 #27 377 1,784 71 86 45.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Miriam Oremans Meike Babel
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1991 0–2 0.0% #134 1,486 0 0
17 1990 1–1 50.0% #185 1,519 0 0 1992 10–18 35.7% #86 1,523 0 0
18 1991 3–9 25.0% #149 1,472 0 0 1993 17–15 53.1% #49 1,616 0 0
19 1992 8–12 40.0% #130 1,531 0 0 1994 13–12 52.0% #46 1,660 0 0
20 1993 28–20 58.3% #31 1,746 0 0 1995 14–10 58.3% #32 1,751 0 0
21 1994 14–18 43.8% #48 1,733 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1995 19–18 51.4% #42 1,768 0 0 1997 7–8 46.7% #116 1,702 0 0
23 1996 17–18 48.6% #46 1,714 0 0 1998 9–16 36.0% #100 1,643 0 0
24 1997 15–15 50.0% #46 1,773 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 1998 13–16 44.8% #57 1,728 0 0 2000 1–5 16.7% #425 1,571 0 0
26 1999 8–17 32.0% #98 1,627 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 2000 17–13 56.7% #64 1,711 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 2001 13–15 46.4% #84 1,690 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2002 6–10 37.5% #124 1,613 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Miriam Oremans Meike Babel
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1990 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 4 10 14 28.6% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1991 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1993 6 4 10 60.0% 11 8 19 57.9% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0%
19 1992 6 6 12 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1994 1 2 3 33.3% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 2 8 75.0%
20 1993 16 14 30 53.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1995 4 3 7 57.1% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
21 1994 5 9 14 35.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1995 7 8 15 46.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 1997 1 3 4 25.0% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1996 2 6 8 25.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 1998 4 7 11 36.4% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1997 3 5 8 37.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1998 1 6 7 14.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — —
26 1999 2 7 9 22.2% 0 5 5 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2000 10 6 16 62.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2001 5 8 13 38.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2002 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 61 85 146 41.8% 28 43 71 39.4% 53 33 86 61.6% 20 21 41 48.8% — 20 31 51 39.2% 40 42 82 48.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 9 9 18 50.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Miriam Oremans Meike Babel
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1486 116.6 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.20 0–1 — — -0.11
17 1990 1520 110.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.60 1–0 — — -0.11 1992 1524 111.1 — — — — 0 +43 — 36.1% -1.25 5–2 (71%) 3–2 (60%) 106.5 +0.29
18 1991 1472 101.8 — — — — +51 +51 — 29.6% -1.00 1–2 (33%) — — +0.66 1993 1617 122.8 — — — — -68 +61 — 46.9% -0.30 4–4 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 100.1 +0.80
19 1992 1532 111.4 — — — — +48 — -24 38.6% -0.80 3–1 (75%) 0–1 — +0.45 1994 1660 133.6 — — — — -29 -5 — 55.6% +0.56 2–4 (33%) 0–5 (0%) 95.6 +1.21
20 1993 1747 146.5 — — — — -74 -220 +26 59.1% +0.56 7–14 (33%) 4–6 (40%) 97.4 +0.65 1995 1752 137.0 — — — — -21 -74 — 59.3% +0.56 2–4 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 100.5 -2.02
21 1994 1733 131.3 — — — — -44 -192 +24 46.8% -0.26 5–8 (38%) 5–7 (42%) 96.7 +0.41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1995 1769 143.9 — — — — -10 -170 -22 50.0% +0.10 6–4 (60%) 6–7 (46%) 104.5 -0.91 1997 1703 118.3 — — — — -34 +27 — 40.0% -0.43 2–0 0–5 (0%) — +0.22
23 1996 1714 134.9 — — — — -34 -67 +161 48.1% +0.09 5–4 (56%) 4–5 (44%) 100.2 +0.41 1998 1643 129.8 — — — — +3 +57 — 42.9% -0.63 2–3 (40%) 1–1 — -1.62
24 1997 1774 137.0 — — — — -31 -189 +117 47.9% +0.10 8–7 (53%) 2–7 (22%) 99.3 -1.65 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1998 1728 120.1 — — — — -72 -132 +210 41.5% -0.65 6–1 (86%) 5–7 (42%) 102.7 -0.25 2000 1572 85.7 — — — — — +26 — 15.4% -2.62 1–0 0–1 — +0.31
26 1999 1628 117.1 — — — — -17 -126 +239 34.0% -1.19 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -1.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2000 1711 126.6 — — — — -8 -186 +166 53.5% +0.13 7–4 (64%) 4–3 (57%) 103.0 +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2001 1690 122.8 — — — — -15 -187 +242 43.3% -0.55 8–3 (73%) 3–3 (50%) 101.2 -1.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2002 1613 100.3 — — — — -1 -157 +280 40.0% -0.60 1–2 (33%) 0–4 (0%) 93.7 +0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1808 135.6 — — — — -26 -145 +138 46.8% -0.19 59–52 (53%) 34–51 (40%) 97.2 -0.73 — 1784 130.2 — — — — -23 +23 — 45.5% -0.38 18–18 (50%) 8–17 (32%) 98.2 -0.59

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.