H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Miriam Oremans vs Monique Javer H2H: 1-0

Miriam Oremans holds a 1–0 lead over Monique Javer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Miriam Oremans leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Miriam Oremans won the 1993 Tokyo Japan Open round of 32 6-4 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Miriam Oremans
NED Age 54 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Monique Javer
GBR Age 59 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Miriam Oremans #56 6-4 7-5 Monique Javer #109 Match data Apr 8, 1993* R32 Tokyo Japan Open Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Miriam Oremans #193 #25 585 1,808 162 182 47.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Monique Javer #746 #56 20 1,684 63 106 37.3% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Miriam Oremans Monique Javer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1990 1–1 50.0% #185 1,519 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1991 3–9 25.0% #149 1,472 0 0 1986 2–3 40.0% #168 1,502 0 0
19 1992 8–12 40.0% #130 1,531 0 0 1987 1–5 16.7% #159 1,475 0 0
20 1993 28–20 58.3% #31 1,746 0 0 1988 11–13 45.8% #73 1,556 0 1
21 1994 14–18 43.8% #48 1,733 0 0 1989 8–16 33.3% #111 1,546 0 1
22 1995 19–18 51.4% #42 1,768 0 0 1990 12–17 41.4% #104 1,572 0 1
23 1996 17–18 48.6% #46 1,714 0 0 1991 10–17 37.0% #112 1,582 0 1
24 1997 15–15 50.0% #46 1,773 0 0 1992 13–18 41.9% #72 1,561 0 1
25 1998 13–16 44.8% #57 1,728 0 0 1993 6–13 31.6% #185 1,540 0 1
26 1999 8–17 32.0% #98 1,627 0 0 1994 0–3 0.0% #339 1,518 0 1
27 2000 17–13 56.7% #64 1,711 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 2001 13–15 46.4% #84 1,690 0 0 1996 0–1 0.0% #779 1,506 0 1
29 2002 6–10 37.5% #124 1,613 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Miriam Oremans Monique Javer
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1990 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1991 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1986 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1992 6 6 12 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1987 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1993 16 14 30 53.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1988 10 7 17 58.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0%
21 1994 5 9 14 35.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 2 5 60.0% 1989 8 12 20 40.0% — — — — 0 4 4 0.0% — — — —
22 1995 7 8 15 46.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 1990 10 11 21 47.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1996 2 6 8 25.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 1991 8 11 19 42.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
24 1997 3 5 8 37.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 3 8 62.5% 1992 12 12 24 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
25 1998 1 6 7 14.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1993 4 11 15 26.7% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
26 1999 2 7 9 22.2% 0 5 5 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 1994 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
27 2000 10 6 16 62.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2001 5 8 13 38.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 1996 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2002 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 61 85 146 41.8% 28 43 71 39.4% 53 33 86 61.6% 20 21 41 48.8% — 54 70 124 43.5% 2 7 9 22.2% 4 17 21 19.0% 3 12 15 20.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Miriam Oremans Monique Javer
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1990 1520 110.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.60 1–0 — — -0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1991 1472 101.8 — — — — +51 +51 — 29.6% -1.00 1–2 (33%) — — +0.66 1986 1503 98.5 — — — — +71 — — 40.0% -1.10 — — — +0.76
19 1992 1532 111.4 — — — — +48 — -24 38.6% -0.80 3–1 (75%) 0–1 — +0.45 1987 1475 99.3 — — — — +34 — — 23.1% -2.00 0–1 — — +0.25
20 1993 1747 146.5 — — — — -74 -220 +26 59.1% +0.56 7–14 (33%) 4–6 (40%) 97.4 +0.65 1988 1557 124.5 — — — — +8 — -11 50.9% 0.00 1–6 (14%) 3–2 (60%) 94.9 +0.95
21 1994 1733 131.3 — — — — -44 -192 +24 46.8% -0.26 5–8 (38%) 5–7 (42%) 96.7 +0.41 1989 1546 110.6 — — — — +26 — -58 36.4% -1.05 3–4 (43%) 3–3 (50%) 98.8 +1.04
22 1995 1769 143.9 — — — — -10 -170 -22 50.0% +0.10 6–4 (60%) 6–7 (46%) 104.5 -0.91 1990 1572 121.6 — — — — +28 -29 -83 43.8% -0.53 2–4 (33%) 3–3 (50%) 100.2 +1.65
23 1996 1714 134.9 — — — — -34 -67 +161 48.1% +0.09 5–4 (56%) 4–5 (44%) 100.2 +0.41 1991 1582 133.9 — — — — +23 — — 44.3% -0.36 0–7 (0%) 2–2 (50%) 91.9 -0.20
24 1997 1774 137.0 — — — — -31 -189 +117 47.9% +0.10 8–7 (53%) 2–7 (22%) 99.3 -1.65 1992 1561 122.7 — — — — +56 — — 44.8% -0.49 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 96.9 +1.08
25 1998 1728 120.1 — — — — -72 -132 +210 41.5% -0.65 6–1 (86%) 5–7 (42%) 102.7 -0.25 1993 1540 109.9 — — — — -12 — -32 34.1% -1.24 1–2 (33%) 0–3 (0%) 96.1 -0.15
26 1999 1628 117.1 — — — — -17 -126 +239 34.0% -1.19 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -1.78 1994 1518 98.2 — — — — — — — 14.3% -3.00 0–1 — — -0.50
27 2000 1711 126.6 — — — — -8 -186 +166 53.5% +0.13 7–4 (64%) 4–3 (57%) 103.0 +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2001 1690 122.8 — — — — -15 -187 +242 43.3% -0.55 8–3 (73%) 3–3 (50%) 101.2 -1.04 1996 1507 94.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.01
29 2002 1613 100.3 — — — — -1 -157 +280 40.0% -0.60 1–2 (33%) 0–4 (0%) 93.7 +0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1808 135.6 — — — — -26 -145 +138 46.8% -0.19 59–52 (53%) 34–51 (40%) 97.2 -0.73 — 1685 123.3 — — — — +26 -29 -46 41.3% -0.70 8–29 (22%) 13–15 (46%) 87.4 +2.88

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.