H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Miriam Oremans vs Natasha Zvereva H2H: 0-4

Natasha Zvereva holds a 4–0 lead over Miriam Oremans in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Natasha Zvereva leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Natasha Zvereva won the 1998 Wimbledon fourth round 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Miriam Oremans
NED Age 53 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 – 4
4 main draw meetings
Natasha Zvereva
BLR Age 55 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 1, 1998* Wimbledon Grand Slam R16 Grass Natasha Zvereva #22 6-4 6-2 Miriam Oremans #60 Match data
Oct 15, 1997* Zurich WTA 1000 R32 Hard Natasha Zvereva #23 6-2 2-6 6-3 Miriam Oremans #55 Match data
Oct 13, 1995* Filderstadt WTA 250 R16 Hard Natasha Zvereva #14 4-6 7-5 7-6 Miriam Oremans #52 Match data
Oct 8, 1994* Zurich WTA 1000 SF Carpet Natasha Zvereva #9 6-0 6-2 Miriam Oremans #65 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Miriam Oremans #193 #25 585 1,809 161 181 47.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Natasha Zvereva #201 #5 1,820 2,073 388 232 62.6% 0 0 0 2 3 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Miriam Oremans Natasha Zvereva
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1986 4–2 66.7% #94 1,575 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1987 21–11 65.6% #19 1,831 0 0
17 1990 1–1 50.0% #185 1,519 0 0 1988 38–17 69.1% #7 1,991 0 0
18 1991 3–9 25.0% #149 1,471 0 0 1989 23–17 57.5% #27 1,802 0 0
19 1992 8–12 40.0% #130 1,532 0 0 1990 38–15 71.7% #12 1,955 0 2
20 1993 28–20 58.3% #31 1,747 0 0 1991 29–18 61.7% #21 1,912 0 2
21 1994 14–18 43.8% #48 1,733 0 0 1992 32–19 62.7% #23 1,977 0 2
22 1995 19–18 51.4% #42 1,769 0 0 1993 37–19 66.1% #19 1,972 0 2
23 1996 17–18 48.6% #46 1,714 0 0 1994 29–12 70.7% #10 1,978 0 3
24 1997 15–15 50.0% #46 1,774 0 0 1995 31–17 64.6% #14 1,971 0 3
25 1998 13–16 44.8% #57 1,729 0 0 1996 11–12 47.8% #57 1,877 0 3
26 1999 8–17 32.0% #98 1,628 0 0 1997 25–20 55.6% #25 1,902 0 3
27 2000 16–12 57.1% #64 1,701 0 0 1998 35–21 62.5% #16 1,932 0 4
28 2001 13–15 46.4% #84 1,686 0 0 1999 24–19 55.8% #27 1,824 0 5
29 2002 6–10 37.5% #124 1,611 0 0 2000 11–12 47.8% #78 1,759 0 5
31 — — — — — — — 2002 0–1 0.0% — 1,733 0 5