H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Miriam Oremans vs Nicole Arendt H2H: 0-2

Nicole Arendt holds a 2–0 lead over Miriam Oremans in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Nicole Arendt leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicole Arendt won the 1995 Birmingham round of 16 6-1 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Miriam Oremans
NED Age 54 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Nicole Arendt
USA Age 57 Left-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nicole Arendt #101 6-1 7-6 Miriam Oremans #39 Match data Jun 16, 1995* R16 Birmingham Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass
Nicole Arendt #110 7-6 6-2 Miriam Oremans #40 Match data Mar 13, 1994* R64 Key Biscayne Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Miriam Oremans #193 #25 585 1,808 162 182 47.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nicole Arendt #433 #49 487 1,775 67 75 47.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Miriam Oremans Nicole Arendt
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1986 2–2 50.0% #164 1,537 0 0
17 1990 1–1 50.0% #185 1,519 0 0 1987 0–1 0.0% #366 1,519 0 0
18 1991 3–9 25.0% #149 1,472 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1992 8–12 40.0% #130 1,531 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1993 28–20 58.3% #31 1,746 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1994 14–18 43.8% #48 1,733 0 0 1991 1–2 33.3% #218 1,523 0 0
22 1995 19–18 51.4% #42 1,768 0 0 1992 4–4 50.0% #124 1,570 0 0
23 1996 17–18 48.6% #46 1,714 0 0 1993 12–15 44.4% #88 1,602 0 0
24 1997 15–15 50.0% #46 1,773 0 0 1994 14–12 53.8% #73 1,700 0 0
25 1998 13–16 44.8% #57 1,728 0 0 1995 11–15 42.3% #117 1,666 0 0
26 1999 8–17 32.0% #98 1,627 0 0 1996 9–11 45.0% #79 1,675 0 0
27 2000 17–13 56.7% #64 1,711 0 0 1997 9–8 52.9% #63 1,753 0 0
28 2001 13–15 46.4% #84 1,690 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2002 6–10 37.5% #124 1,613 0 0 1999 5–4 55.6% #143 1,750 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2000 0–1 0.0% #433 1,732 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Miriam Oremans Nicole Arendt
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1990 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1991 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1992 6 6 12 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1993 16 14 30 53.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1994 5 9 14 35.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 2 5 60.0% 1991 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1995 7 8 15 46.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 1992 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1996 2 6 8 25.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 1993 11 11 22 50.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 1997 3 5 8 37.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 3 8 62.5% 1994 10 8 18 55.6% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1998 1 6 7 14.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1995 6 6 12 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0%
26 1999 2 7 9 22.2% 0 5 5 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 1996 4 4 8 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0%
27 2000 10 6 16 62.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1997 1 3 4 25.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2001 5 8 13 38.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2002 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1999 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 61 85 146 41.8% 28 43 71 39.4% 53 33 86 61.6% 20 21 41 48.8% — 39 42 81 48.1% 6 11 17 35.3% 21 15 36 58.3% 1 7 8 12.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Miriam Oremans Nicole Arendt
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1537 112.1 — — — — +62 — — 50.0% +0.34 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — +0.09
17 1990 1520 110.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.60 1–0 — — -0.11 1987 1520 99.6 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.26
18 1991 1472 101.8 — — — — +51 +51 — 29.6% -1.00 1–2 (33%) — — +0.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1992 1532 111.4 — — — — +48 — -24 38.6% -0.80 3–1 (75%) 0–1 — +0.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1993 1747 146.5 — — — — -74 -220 +26 59.1% +0.56 7–14 (33%) 4–6 (40%) 97.4 +0.65 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1994 1733 131.3 — — — — -44 -192 +24 46.8% -0.26 5–8 (38%) 5–7 (42%) 96.7 +0.41 1991 1523 110.9 — — — — +27 — — 42.9% -1.57 0–1 1–0 — -0.04
22 1995 1769 143.9 — — — — -10 -170 -22 50.0% +0.10 6–4 (60%) 6–7 (46%) 104.5 -0.91 1992 1570 112.2 — — — — +24 — — 47.1% -0.47 1–0 1–3 (25%) — +0.27
23 1996 1714 134.9 — — — — -34 -67 +161 48.1% +0.09 5–4 (56%) 4–5 (44%) 100.2 +0.41 1993 1602 130.5 — — — — +19 — -10 44.6% -0.25 6–5 (55%) 1–1 — +0.08
24 1997 1774 137.0 — — — — -31 -189 +117 47.9% +0.10 8–7 (53%) 2–7 (22%) 99.3 -1.65 1994 1701 125.2 — — — — -25 — -95 54.2% +0.41 3–4 (43%) 5–2 (71%) 102.1 -0.54
25 1998 1728 120.1 — — — — -72 -132 +210 41.5% -0.65 6–1 (86%) 5–7 (42%) 102.7 -0.25 1995 1666 123.1 — — — — +1 -123 -43 43.9% -0.58 2–3 (40%) 6–4 (60%) 101.3 -1.61
26 1999 1628 117.1 — — — — -17 -126 +239 34.0% -1.19 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -1.78 1996 1676 126.6 — — — — +9 -190 +55 43.5% -0.28 4–2 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 102.1 +0.40
27 2000 1711 126.6 — — — — -8 -186 +166 53.5% +0.13 7–4 (64%) 4–3 (57%) 103.0 +0.23 1997 1754 129.2 — — — — -82 -179 +12 50.0% -0.05 4–2 (67%) 0–1 — -0.90
28 2001 1690 122.8 — — — — -15 -187 +242 43.3% -0.55 8–3 (73%) 3–3 (50%) 101.2 -1.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2002 1613 100.3 — — — — -1 -157 +280 40.0% -0.60 1–2 (33%) 0–4 (0%) 93.7 +0.42 1999 1751 114.1 — — — — — -192 +44 55.0% +0.25 1–1 1–1 — -0.33
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1732 97.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.15
Career — 1808 135.6 — — — — -26 -145 +138 46.8% -0.19 59–52 (53%) 34–51 (40%) 97.2 -0.73 — 1775 131.8 — — — — +2 -167 -8 47.3% -0.19 23–21 (52%) 17–16 (52%) 105.8 -1.74

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.