H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Miriam Oremans vs Radomira Zrubakova H2H: 1-2
Radomira Zrubakova holds a 2–1 lead over Miriam Oremans in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Radomira Zrubakova leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Miriam Oremans won the 1996 US Open first round 6-2 4-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 53
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
SVK
Age 55
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 1996* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Miriam Oremans | 6-2 4-6 6-1 | Radomira Zrubakova | Match data |
| Aug 28, 1992* | Schenectady | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Radomira Zrubakova | 6-3 6-2 | Miriam Oremans | Match data |
| Mar 15, 1992* | Key Biscayne | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Radomira Zrubakova | 6-1 6-1 | Miriam Oremans | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Miriam Oremans | #193 | #25 | 585 | 1,809 | 161 | 181 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Radomira Zrubakova | #788 | #22 | 324 | 1,896 | 171 | 155 | 52.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Miriam Oremans | Radomira Zrubakova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #139 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1990 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #185 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 27–16 | 62.8% | #32 | 1,776 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1991 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #149 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 22–13 | 62.9% | #32 | 1,807 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1992 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #130 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #57 | 1,723 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1993 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #31 | 1,747 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 33–20 | 62.3% | #23 | 1,821 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1994 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #48 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #28 | 1,817 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1995 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #42 | 1,769 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #94 | 1,663 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1996 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #46 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #76 | 1,628 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1997 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,774 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #92 | 1,621 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1998 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #57 | 1,729 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #86 | 1,569 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1999 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #98 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #125 | 1,564 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2000 | 16–12 | 57.1% | #64 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2001 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #84 | 1,686 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2002 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #124 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |