H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Miriam Oremans vs Rennae Stubbs H2H: 1-0

Miriam Oremans holds a 1–0 lead over Rennae Stubbs in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Miriam Oremans leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Miriam Oremans won the 1992 Canadian Open round of 64 5-7 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Miriam Oremans
NED Age 54 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Rennae Stubbs
AUS Age 55 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Miriam Oremans #158 5-7 6-2 6-4 Rennae Stubbs #87 Match data Aug 19, 1992* R64 Canadian Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Miriam Oremans #193 #25 585 1,808 162 182 47.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rennae Stubbs #590 #64 221 1,598 34 71 32.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Miriam Oremans Rennae Stubbs
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1990 1–1 50.0% #185 1,519 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1991 3–9 25.0% #149 1,472 0 0 1989 1–1 50.0% #223 1,504 0 0
19 1992 8–12 40.0% #130 1,531 0 0 1990 1–5 16.7% #203 1,472 0 0
20 1993 28–20 58.3% #31 1,746 0 0 1991 1–5 16.7% #182 1,459 0 0
21 1994 14–18 43.8% #48 1,733 0 0 1992 10–13 43.5% #92 1,532 0 0
22 1995 19–18 51.4% #42 1,768 0 0 1993 5–13 27.8% #174 1,503 0 0
23 1996 17–18 48.6% #46 1,714 0 0 1994 3–6 33.3% #213 1,492 0 0
24 1997 15–15 50.0% #46 1,773 0 0 1995 7–9 43.8% #89 1,557 0 0
25 1998 13–16 44.8% #57 1,728 0 0 1996 5–15 25.0% #108 1,530 0 0
26 1999 8–17 32.0% #98 1,627 0 0 1997 0–1 0.0% #425 1,519 0 0
27 2000 17–13 56.7% #64 1,711 0 0 1998 1–3 25.0% #230 1,529 0 0
28 2001 13–15 46.4% #84 1,690 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2002 6–10 37.5% #124 1,613 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Miriam Oremans Rennae Stubbs
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1990 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1991 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1989 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1992 6 6 12 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1990 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 1993 16 14 30 53.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1991 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
21 1994 5 9 14 35.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 2 5 60.0% 1992 3 7 10 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 1995 7 8 15 46.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 1993 3 8 11 27.3% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0%
23 1996 2 6 8 25.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 1994 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 1997 3 5 8 37.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 3 8 62.5% 1995 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
25 1998 1 6 7 14.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1996 3 7 10 30.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
26 1999 2 7 9 22.2% 0 5 5 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 1997 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2000 10 6 16 62.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1998 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
28 2001 5 8 13 38.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2002 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 61 85 146 41.8% 28 43 71 39.4% 53 33 86 61.6% 20 21 41 48.8% — 15 40 55 27.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 11 15 26 42.3% 8 13 21 38.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Miriam Oremans Rennae Stubbs
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1990 1520 110.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.60 1–0 — — -0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1991 1472 101.8 — — — — +51 +51 — 29.6% -1.00 1–2 (33%) — — +0.66 1989 1505 101.8 — — — — — — — 60.0% 0.00 0–1 — — +0.35
19 1992 1532 111.4 — — — — +48 — -24 38.6% -0.80 3–1 (75%) 0–1 — +0.45 1990 1473 100.0 — — — — +39 — — 26.7% -1.27 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +0.07
20 1993 1747 146.5 — — — — -74 -220 +26 59.1% +0.56 7–14 (33%) 4–6 (40%) 97.4 +0.65 1991 1460 103.1 — — — — +15 — +102 23.1% -2.46 0–1 — — -0.14
21 1994 1733 131.3 — — — — -44 -192 +24 46.8% -0.26 5–8 (38%) 5–7 (42%) 96.7 +0.41 1992 1532 118.9 — — — — -50 — +115 50.0% -0.07 1–7 (13%) 1–2 (33%) 93.7 +1.98
22 1995 1769 143.9 — — — — -10 -170 -22 50.0% +0.10 6–4 (60%) 6–7 (46%) 104.5 -0.91 1993 1503 111.6 — — — — -49 — +166 36.6% -0.44 2–5 (29%) 1–2 (33%) 95.9 +0.29
23 1996 1714 134.9 — — — — -34 -67 +161 48.1% +0.09 5–4 (56%) 4–5 (44%) 100.2 +0.41 1994 1492 107.9 — — — — -17 — — 35.0% -1.05 1–1 0–1 — +0.02
24 1997 1774 137.0 — — — — -31 -189 +117 47.9% +0.10 8–7 (53%) 2–7 (22%) 99.3 -1.65 1995 1557 121.5 — — — — -21 — +41 43.6% -0.56 4–3 (57%) 3–2 (60%) 104.2 +0.01
25 1998 1728 120.1 — — — — -72 -132 +210 41.5% -0.65 6–1 (86%) 5–7 (42%) 102.7 -0.25 1996 1530 118.1 — — — — +1 — — 27.9% -1.60 1–2 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 97.1 +0.29
26 1999 1628 117.1 — — — — -17 -126 +239 34.0% -1.19 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -1.78 1997 1519 102.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.03
27 2000 1711 126.6 — — — — -8 -186 +166 53.5% +0.13 7–4 (64%) 4–3 (57%) 103.0 +0.23 1998 1529 107.9 — — — — — — +99 30.0% -1.30 1–1 0–1 — -0.70
28 2001 1690 122.8 — — — — -15 -187 +242 43.3% -0.55 8–3 (73%) 3–3 (50%) 101.2 -1.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2002 1613 100.3 — — — — -1 -157 +280 40.0% -0.60 1–2 (33%) 0–4 (0%) 93.7 +0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1808 135.6 — — — — -26 -145 +138 46.8% -0.19 59–52 (53%) 34–51 (40%) 97.2 -0.73 — 1598 119.3 — — — — -20 — +105 37.9% -0.83 11–24 (31%) 7–12 (37%) 91.4 +2.12

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.