H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Miriam Oremans vs Rika Hiraki H2H: 1-1
Miriam Oremans and Rika Hiraki are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Miriam Oremans leads 1–0 on clay, while Rika Hiraki leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Miriam Oremans won the 1993 Roland Garros first round 6-4 6-7(5) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 53
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 54
Right-Handed
157 cm / 5'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 1993* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Miriam Oremans | 6-4 6-7(5) 6-2 | Rika Hiraki | Match data |
| Apr 12, 1991* | Tokyo Japan Open | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Rika Hiraki | 7-5 7-5 | Miriam Oremans | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Miriam Oremans | #193 | #25 | 585 | 1,809 | 161 | 181 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Rika Hiraki | #965 | #72 | 325 | 1,589 | 48 | 93 | 34.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Miriam Oremans | Rika Hiraki | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #305 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1990 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #185 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1991 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #149 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #248 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1992 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #130 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #105 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1993 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #31 | 1,747 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #122 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1994 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #48 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #134 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1995 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #42 | 1,769 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #187 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1996 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #46 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #152 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1997 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,774 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #103 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1998 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #57 | 1,729 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #93 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1999 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #98 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #168 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2000 | 16–12 | 57.1% | #64 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2001 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #84 | 1,686 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2002 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #124 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #339 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |