H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Miriam Oremans vs Sabine Appelmans H2H: 3-4

Sabine Appelmans holds a 4–3 lead over Miriam Oremans in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Sabine Appelmans leads 3–1 on carpet, while Miriam Oremans leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Miriam Oremans won the 1999 Birmingham third round 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Miriam Oremans
NED Age 53 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
3 – 4
7 main draw meetings
Sabine Appelmans
BEL Age 54 Left-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 10, 1999* Birmingham WTA 250 R32 Grass Miriam Oremans #50 6-4 6-4 Sabine Appelmans #75 Match data
Sep 26, 1997* Leipzig WTA 250 R16 Carpet Sabine Appelmans #17 2-6 6-3 7-5 Miriam Oremans #52 Match data
Mar 1, 1996* Linz WTA 500 R16 Carpet Sabine Appelmans #28 6-3 7-5 Miriam Oremans #42 Match data
Sep 28, 1995* Leipzig WTA 250 R32 Carpet Miriam Oremans #39 6-4 6-7 6-3 Sabine Appelmans #32 Match data
Feb 23, 1995* Linz WTA 500 R32 Carpet Sabine Appelmans #30 6-2 6-3 Miriam Oremans #39 Match data
Oct 28, 1994* Essen WTA 250 R16 Hard Sabine Appelmans #24 6-0 7-5 Miriam Oremans #49 Match data
May 26, 1994* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Miriam Oremans #54 6-3 1-6 6-4 Sabine Appelmans #17 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Miriam Oremans #193 #25 585 1,809 161 181 47.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sabine Appelmans #94 #16 1,502 1,923 279 202 58.0% 0 0 0 2 5 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Miriam Oremans Sabine Appelmans
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1987 1–1 50.0% #283 1,502 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1988 1–3 25.0% #196 1,498 0 0
17 1990 1–1 50.0% #185 1,519 0 0 1989 2–5 28.6% #144 1,468 0 0
18 1991 3–9 25.0% #149 1,471 0 0 1990 21–12 63.6% #22 1,679 0 0
19 1992 8–12 40.0% #130 1,532 0 0 1991 34–14 70.8% #18 1,873 0 2
20 1993 28–20 58.3% #31 1,747 0 0 1992 26–15 63.4% #26 1,875 0 3
21 1994 14–18 43.8% #48 1,733 0 0 1993 19–15 55.9% #36 1,828 0 3
22 1995 19–18 51.4% #42 1,769 0 0 1994 29–16 64.4% #27 1,821 0 5
23 1996 17–18 48.6% #46 1,714 0 0 1995 24–17 58.5% #31 1,809 0 6
24 1997 15–15 50.0% #46 1,774 0 0 1996 26–16 61.9% #21 1,843 0 7
25 1998 13–16 44.8% #57 1,729 0 0 1997 37–26 58.7% #16 1,856 0 7
26 1999 8–17 32.0% #98 1,628 0 0 1998 13–18 41.9% #48 1,721 0 7
27 2000 16–12 57.1% #64 1,701 0 0 1999 25–21 54.3% #30 1,777 0 7
28 2001 13–15 46.4% #84 1,686 0 0 2000 20–22 47.6% #49 1,692 0 7
29 2002 6–10 37.5% #124 1,611 0 0 2001 1–1 50.0% #94 1,685 0 7