H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Miriam Oremans vs Sabine Appelmans H2H: 3-4

Sabine Appelmans holds a 4–3 lead over Miriam Oremans in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Sabine Appelmans leads 3–1 on carpet, while Miriam Oremans leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Miriam Oremans won the 1999 Birmingham round of 32 6-4 6-4.

NED Age 54 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
3 4
7 main-draw meetings
BEL Age 54 Left-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Miriam Oremans #50 6-4 6-4 Sabine Appelmans #75 Match data Jun 10, 1999* R32 Birmingham Tier III modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass
Sabine Appelmans #17 2-6 6-3 7-5 Miriam Oremans #52 Match data Sep 26, 1997* R16 Leipzig Tier II modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet
Sabine Appelmans #28 6-3 7-5 Miriam Oremans #42 Match data Mar 1, 1996* R16 Linz Open Tier III modern equivalent WTA 250 Carpet
Miriam Oremans #39 6-4 6-7 6-3 Sabine Appelmans #32 Match data Sep 28, 1995* R32 Leipzig Tier II modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet
Sabine Appelmans #30 6-2 6-3 Miriam Oremans #39 Match data Feb 23, 1995* R32 Linz Open Tier III modern equivalent WTA 250 Carpet
Sabine Appelmans #24 6-0 7-5 Miriam Oremans #49 Match data Oct 28, 1994* R16 Essen Tier II modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Miriam Oremans #54 6-3 1-6 6-4 Sabine Appelmans #17 Match data May 26, 1994* R64 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Miriam Oremans #193 #25 585 1,808 162 182 47.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sabine Appelmans #94 #16 1,502 1,925 284 205 58.1% 0 0 0 0 7 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Miriam Oremans Sabine Appelmans
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1987 1–1 50.0% #283 1,502 0 0
16 1988 1–3 25.0% #196 1,498 0 0
17 1990 1–1 50.0% #185 1,519 0 0 1989 2–5 28.6% #144 1,467 0 0
18 1991 3–9 25.0% #149 1,472 0 0 1990 21–12 63.6% #22 1,679 0 0
19 1992 8–12 40.0% #130 1,531 0 0 1991 34–14 70.8% #18 1,873 0 2
20 1993 28–20 58.3% #31 1,746 0 0 1992 29–16 64.4% #26 1,895 0 3
21 1994 14–18 43.8% #48 1,733 0 0 1993 19–15 55.9% #36 1,834 0 3
22 1995 19–18 51.4% #42 1,768 0 0 1994 29–16 64.4% #27 1,821 0 5
23 1996 17–18 48.6% #46 1,714 0 0 1995 24–17 58.5% #31 1,809 0 6
24 1997 15–15 50.0% #46 1,773 0 0 1996 26–17 60.5% #21 1,832 0 7
25 1998 13–16 44.8% #57 1,728 0 0 1997 37–26 58.7% #16 1,855 0 7
26 1999 8–17 32.0% #98 1,627 0 0 1998 13–18 41.9% #48 1,722 0 7
27 2000 17–13 56.7% #64 1,711 0 0 1999 25–21 54.3% #30 1,778 0 7
28 2001 13–15 46.4% #84 1,690 0 0 2000 22–23 48.9% #49 1,697 0 7
29 2002 6–10 37.5% #124 1,613 0 0 2001 1–1 50.0% #94 1,689 0 7

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Miriam Oremans Sabine Appelmans
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1987 1 1 2 50.0%
16 1988 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
17 1990 1 1 2 50.0% 1989 2 2 4 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
18 1991 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1990 15 6 21 71.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
19 1992 6 6 12 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1991 26 8 34 76.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
20 1993 16 14 30 53.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1992 15 6 21 71.4% 8 4 12 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0%
21 1994 5 9 14 35.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 2 5 60.0% 1993 7 8 15 46.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 7 3 10 70.0%
22 1995 7 8 15 46.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 1994 19 9 28 67.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 8 3 11 72.7%
23 1996 2 6 8 25.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 1995 10 8 18 55.6% 9 4 13 69.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
24 1997 3 5 8 37.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 3 8 62.5% 1996 7 7 14 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 2 6 66.7% 12 4 16 75.0%
25 1998 1 6 7 14.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1997 12 10 22 54.5% 11 5 16 68.8% 5 2 7 71.4% 9 9 18 50.0%
26 1999 2 7 9 22.2% 0 5 5 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 1998 1 4 5 20.0% 0 6 6 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 8 6 14 57.1%
27 2000 10 6 16 62.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1999 11 8 19 57.9% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
28 2001 5 8 13 38.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 2000 13 12 25 52.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
29 2002 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2001 1 1 2 50.0%
Career 61 85 146 41.8% 28 43 71 39.4% 53 33 86 61.6% 20 21 41 48.8% 139 90 229 60.7% 54 49 103 52.4% 22 17 39 56.4% 69 49 118 58.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Miriam Oremans Sabine Appelmans
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1987 1502 99.4 50.0% -0.17 1–1 +0.44
16 1988 1498 106.4 +40 30.0% -1.10 1–1 0–1 +0.03
17 1990 1520 110.3 40.0% -0.60 1–0 -0.11 1989 1468 98.3 +65 +26 31.3% -0.50 1–1 0–2 +0.98
18 1991 1472 101.8 +51 +51 29.6% -1.00 1–2 (33%) +0.66 1990 1679 133.0 +19 -159 59.2% +0.76 7–3 (70%) 1–4 (20%) 103.2 +2.93
19 1992 1532 111.4 +48 -24 38.6% -0.80 3–1 (75%) 0–1 +0.45 1991 1873 150.3 +27 -285 69.9% +1.36 5–4 (56%) 1–0 +1.14
20 1993 1747 146.5 -74 -220 +26 59.1% +0.56 7–14 (33%) 4–6 (40%) 97.4 +0.65 1992 1896 145.1 +3 -146 61.0% +0.64 7–3 (70%) 2–3 (40%) 104.4 -0.44
21 1994 1733 131.3 -44 -192 +24 46.8% -0.26 5–8 (38%) 5–7 (42%) 96.7 +0.41 1993 1835 135.0 +9 -112 -193 53.1% +0.44 8–5 (62%) 2–5 (29%) 98.4 +0.40
22 1995 1769 143.9 -10 -170 -22 50.0% +0.10 6–4 (60%) 6–7 (46%) 104.5 -0.91 1994 1822 144.0 +46 -108 58.0% +0.80 10–2 (83%) 5–4 (56%) 106.6 +0.26
23 1996 1714 134.9 -34 -67 +161 48.1% +0.09 5–4 (56%) 4–5 (44%) 100.2 +0.41 1995 1809 140.0 -2 -18 57.6% +0.37 5–5 (50%) 4–1 (80%) 99.8 -0.91
24 1997 1774 137.0 -31 -189 +117 47.9% +0.10 8–7 (53%) 2–7 (22%) 99.3 -1.65 1996 1833 145.6 -10 -70 -165 62.1% +0.81 4–7 (36%) 3–4 (43%) 95.3 +0.59
25 1998 1728 120.1 -72 -132 +210 41.5% -0.65 6–1 (86%) 5–7 (42%) 102.7 -0.25 1997 1855 155.7 -46 -8 -89 58.7% +0.54 9–14 (39%) 4–7 (36%) 93.5 -1.41
26 1999 1628 117.1 -17 -126 +239 34.0% -1.19 1–2 (33%) 1–1 -1.78 1998 1722 138.4 +60 +2 +76 47.1% -0.26 1–9 (10%) 3–3 (50%) 89.5 -0.30
27 2000 1711 126.6 -8 -186 +166 53.5% +0.13 7–4 (64%) 4–3 (57%) 103.0 +0.23 1999 1778 137.2 +27 -92 -38 56.3% +0.48 5–8 (38%) 7–9 (44%) 95.0 -0.07
28 2001 1690 122.8 -15 -187 +242 43.3% -0.55 8–3 (73%) 3–3 (50%) 101.2 -1.04 2000 1697 139.6 +36 -31 +95 48.5% -0.15 7–6 (54%) 7–6 (54%) 100.1 -0.37
29 2002 1613 100.3 -1 -157 +280 40.0% -0.60 1–2 (33%) 0–4 (0%) 93.7 +0.42 2001 1689 101.4 50.0% -0.50 1–0 +0.19
Career 1808 135.6 -26 -145 +138 46.8% -0.19 59–52 (53%) 34–51 (40%) 97.2 -0.73 1925 148.8 +14 -69 -45 57.1% +0.51 71–69 (51%) 40–49 (45%) 95.3 +0.71

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.