H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC
Stacey Schefflin holds a 1–0 lead over Miriam Oremans in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Stacey Schefflin leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Stacey Schefflin won the 1991 Australian Open round of 128 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stacey Schefflin | 7-5 6-4 | Miriam Oremans | Match data | Jan 16, 1991* | R128 | Australian Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Miriam Oremans | #193 | #25 | 585 | 1,808 | 162 | 182 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Stacey Schefflin | #517 | #165 | 5 | 1,534 | 2 | 3 | 40.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Miriam Oremans | Stacey Schefflin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1990 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #185 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1991 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #149 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1992 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #130 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1993 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #31 | 1,746 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1994 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #48 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1995 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #42 | 1,768 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1996 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #46 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #252 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1997 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,773 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1998 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #57 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1999 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #98 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2000 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #64 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2001 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #84 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2002 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #124 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Miriam Oremans | Stacey Schefflin | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | 1990 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1991 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1992 | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1993 | 16 | 14 | 30 | 53.3% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 8 | 2 | 10 | 80.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1994 | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1995 | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1996 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 1991 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1997 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1998 | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1999 | 2 | 7 | 9 | 22.2% | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2000 | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2001 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2002 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 61 | 85 | 146 | 41.8% | 28 | 43 | 71 | 39.4% | 53 | 33 | 86 | 61.6% | 20 | 21 | 41 | 48.8% | — | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Miriam Oremans | Stacey Schefflin | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | 1990 | 1520 | 110.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 40.0% | -0.60 | 1–0 | — | — | -0.11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1991 | 1472 | 101.8 | — | — | — | — | +51 | +51 | — | 29.6% | -1.00 | 1–2 (33%) | — | — | +0.66 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1992 | 1532 | 111.4 | — | — | — | — | +48 | — | -24 | 38.6% | -0.80 | 3–1 (75%) | 0–1 | — | +0.45 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1993 | 1747 | 146.5 | — | — | — | — | -74 | -220 | +26 | 59.1% | +0.56 | 7–14 (33%) | 4–6 (40%) | 97.4 | +0.65 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1994 | 1733 | 131.3 | — | — | — | — | -44 | -192 | +24 | 46.8% | -0.26 | 5–8 (38%) | 5–7 (42%) | 96.7 | +0.41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1995 | 1769 | 143.9 | — | — | — | — | -10 | -170 | -22 | 50.0% | +0.10 | 6–4 (60%) | 6–7 (46%) | 104.5 | -0.91 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1996 | 1714 | 134.9 | — | — | — | — | -34 | -67 | +161 | 48.1% | +0.09 | 5–4 (56%) | 4–5 (44%) | 100.2 | +0.41 | 1991 | 1501 | 101.3 | — | — | — | — | +46 | — | — | 40.0% | -0.90 | — | — | — | +0.66 |
| 24 | 1997 | 1774 | 137.0 | — | — | — | — | -31 | -189 | +117 | 47.9% | +0.10 | 8–7 (53%) | 2–7 (22%) | 99.3 | -1.65 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1998 | 1728 | 120.1 | — | — | — | — | -72 | -132 | +210 | 41.5% | -0.65 | 6–1 (86%) | 5–7 (42%) | 102.7 | -0.25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1999 | 1628 | 117.1 | — | — | — | — | -17 | -126 | +239 | 34.0% | -1.19 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–1 | — | -1.78 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2000 | 1711 | 126.6 | — | — | — | — | -8 | -186 | +166 | 53.5% | +0.13 | 7–4 (64%) | 4–3 (57%) | 103.0 | +0.23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2001 | 1690 | 122.8 | — | — | — | — | -15 | -187 | +242 | 43.3% | -0.55 | 8–3 (73%) | 3–3 (50%) | 101.2 | -1.04 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2002 | 1613 | 100.3 | — | — | — | — | -1 | -157 | +280 | 40.0% | -0.60 | 1–2 (33%) | 0–4 (0%) | 93.7 | +0.42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1808 | 135.6 | — | — | — | — | -26 | -145 | +138 | 46.8% | -0.19 | 59–52 (53%) | 34–51 (40%) | 97.2 | -0.73 | — | 1535 | 100.8 | — | — | — | — | +46 | — | — | 40.0% | -0.90 | — | — | — | +13.20 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sabine Appelmans | 3 | 4 | 7 | Jun 10, 1999 | H2H |
| Sandrine Testud | 0 | 6 | 6 | Feb 23, 2001 | H2H |
| Julie Halard-Decugis | 2 | 4 | 6 | Aug 22, 2000 | H2H |
| Conchita Martínez | 0 | 6 | 6 | Sep 2, 1998 | H2H |
| Magdalena Maleeva | 2 | 3 | 5 | Jun 21, 2002 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bettina Fulco | 0 | 1 | 1 | Apr 3, 1991 | H2H |
| Ann Henricksson | 0 | 1 | 1 | Mar 16, 1991 | H2H |
| Rachel Mcquillan | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jan 20, 1991 | H2H |
| Tamaka Takagi | 1 | 0 | 1 | Jan 18, 1991 | H2H |
| Miriam Oremans | 1 | 0 | 1 | Jan 16, 1991 | H2H |