H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Miriam Oremans vs Stephanie Rottier H2H: 0-1

Stephanie Rottier holds a 1–0 lead over Miriam Oremans in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Stephanie Rottier leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Stephanie Rottier won the 1993 Indian Wells Open quarterfinal 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Miriam Oremans
NED Age 54 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Stephanie Rottier
NED Age 52 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Stephanie Rottier #76 6-2 6-3 Miriam Oremans #88 Match data Feb 22, 1993 QF Indian Wells Open Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Miriam Oremans #193 #25 585 1,808 162 182 47.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stephanie Rottier #537 #30 78 1,820 58 64 47.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Miriam Oremans Stephanie Rottier
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1990 2–1 66.7% #156 1,534 0 0
17 1990 1–1 50.0% #185 1,519 0 0 1991 3–7 30.0% #154 1,504 0 0
18 1991 3–9 25.0% #149 1,472 0 0 1992 7–9 43.8% #91 1,568 0 0
19 1992 8–12 40.0% #130 1,531 0 0 1993 25–17 59.5% #32 1,750 0 0
20 1993 28–20 58.3% #31 1,746 0 0 1994 9–15 37.5% #95 1,718 0 0
21 1994 14–18 43.8% #48 1,733 0 0 1995 11–13 45.8% #84 1,672 0 0
22 1995 19–18 51.4% #42 1,768 0 0 1996 1–2 33.3% #247 1,654 0 0
23 1996 17–18 48.6% #46 1,714 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 1997 15–15 50.0% #46 1,773 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 1998 13–16 44.8% #57 1,728 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 1999 8–17 32.0% #98 1,627 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 2000 17–13 56.7% #64 1,711 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 2001 13–15 46.4% #84 1,690 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2002 6–10 37.5% #124 1,613 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Miriam Oremans Stephanie Rottier
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1990 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1 3 4 25.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — —
18 1991 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1992 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 1992 6 6 12 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1993 21 12 33 63.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
20 1993 16 14 30 53.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1994 7 11 18 38.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
21 1994 5 9 14 35.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 2 5 60.0% 1995 6 9 15 40.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 1995 7 8 15 46.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 1996 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1996 2 6 8 25.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1997 3 5 8 37.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1998 1 6 7 14.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1999 2 7 9 22.2% 0 5 5 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2000 10 6 16 62.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2001 5 8 13 38.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2002 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 61 85 146 41.8% 28 43 71 39.4% 53 33 86 61.6% 20 21 41 48.8% — 44 44 88 50.0% 8 12 20 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 6 5 11 54.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Miriam Oremans Stephanie Rottier
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1534 109.8 — — — — +47 — — 66.7% +0.50 — — — +0.12
17 1990 1520 110.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.60 1–0 — — -0.11 1991 1504 106.4 — — — — +47 +5 — 36.8% -0.68 0–1 — — +0.69
18 1991 1472 101.8 — — — — +51 +51 — 29.6% -1.00 1–2 (33%) — — +0.66 1992 1569 124.1 — — — — +55 — — 46.9% -0.22 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.12
19 1992 1532 111.4 — — — — +48 — -24 38.6% -0.80 3–1 (75%) 0–1 — +0.45 1993 1750 148.0 — — — — +53 — — 57.3% +0.38 7–5 (58%) 5–4 (56%) 102.3 -1.22
20 1993 1747 146.5 — — — — -74 -220 +26 59.1% +0.56 7–14 (33%) 4–6 (40%) 97.4 +0.65 1994 1719 142.3 — — — — +20 -199 — 37.7% -0.68 5–2 (71%) 1–2 (33%) 103.8 -2.53
21 1994 1733 131.3 — — — — -44 -192 +24 46.8% -0.26 5–8 (38%) 5–7 (42%) 96.7 +0.41 1995 1673 121.3 — — — — +18 -105 — 47.2% -0.21 2–3 (40%) 3–2 (60%) 99.8 -1.13
22 1995 1769 143.9 — — — — -10 -170 -22 50.0% +0.10 6–4 (60%) 6–7 (46%) 104.5 -0.91 1996 1654 105.3 — — — — +15 — — 37.5% -0.62 1–1 — — +0.02
23 1996 1714 134.9 — — — — -34 -67 +161 48.1% +0.09 5–4 (56%) 4–5 (44%) 100.2 +0.41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1997 1774 137.0 — — — — -31 -189 +117 47.9% +0.10 8–7 (53%) 2–7 (22%) 99.3 -1.65 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1998 1728 120.1 — — — — -72 -132 +210 41.5% -0.65 6–1 (86%) 5–7 (42%) 102.7 -0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1999 1628 117.1 — — — — -17 -126 +239 34.0% -1.19 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -1.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2000 1711 126.6 — — — — -8 -186 +166 53.5% +0.13 7–4 (64%) 4–3 (57%) 103.0 +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2001 1690 122.8 — — — — -15 -187 +242 43.3% -0.55 8–3 (73%) 3–3 (50%) 101.2 -1.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2002 1613 100.3 — — — — -1 -157 +280 40.0% -0.60 1–2 (33%) 0–4 (0%) 93.7 +0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1808 135.6 — — — — -26 -145 +138 46.8% -0.19 59–52 (53%) 34–51 (40%) 97.2 -0.73 — 1821 139.9 — — — — +39 -83 — 48.3% -0.12 16–13 (55%) 10–10 (50%) 102.8 -3.22

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.