H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Miriam Oremans vs Tami Whitlinger Jones H2H: 1-1

Miriam Oremans and Tami Whitlinger Jones are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Miriam Oremans leads 1–0 on clay, while Tami Whitlinger Jones leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Miriam Oremans won the 1995 Strasbourg fourth round 6-1 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Miriam Oremans
NED Age 53 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Tami Whitlinger Jones
USA Age 57

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 26, 1995* Strasbourg WTA 500 R16 Clay Miriam Oremans #31 6-1 6-0 Tami Whitlinger Jones Match data
Jan 14, 1993* Sydney WTA 500 R32 Hard Tami Whitlinger Jones 2-6 6-1 6-2 Miriam Oremans #130 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Miriam Oremans #193 #25 585 1,809 161 181 47.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tami Whitlinger Jones — — — 1,786 106 135 44.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Miriam Oremans Tami Whitlinger Jones
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1990 1–1 50.0% #185 1,519 0 0 1986 0–1 0.0% — 1,493 0 0
18 1991 3–9 25.0% #149 1,471 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1992 8–12 40.0% #130 1,532 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1993 28–20 58.3% #31 1,747 0 0 1989 4–5 44.4% — 1,525 0 0
21 1994 14–18 43.8% #48 1,733 0 0 1990 12–16 42.9% — 1,577 0 0
22 1995 19–18 51.4% #42 1,769 0 0 1991 17–18 48.6% — 1,682 0 0
23 1996 17–18 48.6% #46 1,714 0 0 1992 13–16 44.8% — 1,645 0 0
24 1997 15–15 50.0% #46 1,774 0 0 1993 13–19 40.6% — 1,651 0 0
25 1998 13–16 44.8% #57 1,729 0 0 1994 16–18 47.1% — 1,729 0 0
26 1999 8–17 32.0% #98 1,628 0 0 1995 19–18 51.4% — 1,705 0 0
27 2000 16–12 57.1% #64 1,701 0 0 1996 10–13 43.5% — 1,697 0 0
28 2001 13–15 46.4% #84 1,686 0 0 1997 2–11 15.4% — 1,598 0 0
29 2002 6–10 37.5% #124 1,611 0 0 — — — — — — —