H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Miriam Oremans vs Wiltrud Probst H2H: 1-1

Miriam Oremans and Wiltrud Probst are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Miriam Oremans won the 1995 Paris round of 32 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Miriam Oremans
NED Age 54 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Wiltrud Probst
GER Age 57 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Miriam Oremans #40 6-4 6-2 Wiltrud Probst #81 Match data Feb 17, 1995* R32 Paris Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Wiltrud Probst #48 3-6 7-5 6-4 Miriam Oremans #52 Match data Apr 16, 1993* R16 Pattaya Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Miriam Oremans #193 #25 585 1,808 162 182 47.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Wiltrud Probst #794 #31 344 1,756 119 161 42.5% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Miriam Oremans Wiltrud Probst
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1990 1–1 50.0% #185 1,519 0 0 1986 4–5 44.4% #135 1,510 0 0
18 1991 3–9 25.0% #149 1,472 0 0 1987 9–14 39.1% #99 1,569 0 0
19 1992 8–12 40.0% #130 1,531 0 0 1988 13–17 43.3% #80 1,623 0 0
20 1993 28–20 58.3% #31 1,746 0 0 1989 11–13 45.8% #90 1,651 0 0
21 1994 14–18 43.8% #48 1,733 0 0 1990 19–14 57.6% #40 1,706 0 1
22 1995 19–18 51.4% #42 1,768 0 0 1991 9–18 33.3% #126 1,581 0 1
23 1996 17–18 48.6% #46 1,714 0 0 1992 16–13 55.2% #40 1,707 0 2
24 1997 15–15 50.0% #46 1,773 0 0 1993 10–18 35.7% #105 1,611 0 2
25 1998 13–16 44.8% #57 1,728 0 0 1994 11–14 44.0% #69 1,630 0 2
26 1999 8–17 32.0% #98 1,627 0 0 1995 7–11 38.9% #146 1,617 0 2
27 2000 17–13 56.7% #64 1,711 0 0 1996 1–6 14.3% #113 1,574 0 2
28 2001 13–15 46.4% #84 1,690 0 0 1997 7–9 43.8% #84 1,600 0 2
29 2002 6–10 37.5% #124 1,613 0 0 1998 2–9 18.2% #194 1,556 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Miriam Oremans Wiltrud Probst
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1990 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0%
18 1991 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1987 1 4 5 20.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
19 1992 6 6 12 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1988 2 4 6 33.3% 8 7 15 53.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
20 1993 16 14 30 53.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1989 4 6 10 40.0% 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1994 5 9 14 35.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 2 5 60.0% 1990 10 6 16 62.5% 7 4 11 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
22 1995 7 8 15 46.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 1991 5 8 13 38.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 4 4 0.0%
23 1996 2 6 8 25.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 1992 3 2 5 60.0% 11 4 15 73.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 6 8 25.0%
24 1997 3 5 8 37.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 3 8 62.5% 1993 3 9 12 25.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
25 1998 1 6 7 14.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1994 6 5 11 54.5% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
26 1999 2 7 9 22.2% 0 5 5 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 1995 1 2 3 33.3% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2000 10 6 16 62.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1996 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
28 2001 5 8 13 38.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 1997 2 2 4 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2002 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1998 0 2 2 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
Career — 61 85 146 41.8% 28 43 71 39.4% 53 33 86 61.6% 20 21 41 48.8% — 37 51 88 42.0% 63 66 129 48.8% 7 15 22 31.8% 12 29 41 29.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Miriam Oremans Wiltrud Probst
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1990 1520 110.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.60 1–0 — — -0.11 1986 1511 104.4 — — — — +66 +21 — 42.1% -0.32 1–0 1–3 (25%) — +1.63
18 1991 1472 101.8 — — — — +51 +51 — 29.6% -1.00 1–2 (33%) — — +0.66 1987 1570 115.5 — — — — -32 +23 -24 41.5% -0.68 3–4 (43%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.79
19 1992 1532 111.4 — — — — +48 — -24 38.6% -0.80 3–1 (75%) 0–1 — +0.45 1988 1623 127.8 — — — — -71 +18 -77 43.1% -0.81 7–5 (58%) 3–3 (50%) 102.0 -1.73
20 1993 1747 146.5 — — — — -74 -220 +26 59.1% +0.56 7–14 (33%) 4–6 (40%) 97.4 +0.65 1989 1651 120.9 — — — — -107 +48 — 46.4% -0.36 4–4 (50%) 4–0 (100%) 104.4 +0.43
21 1994 1733 131.3 — — — — -44 -192 +24 46.8% -0.26 5–8 (38%) 5–7 (42%) 96.7 +0.41 1990 1707 126.7 — — — — -62 +51 — 55.1% +0.37 7–5 (58%) 2–1 (67%) — +1.71
22 1995 1769 143.9 — — — — -10 -170 -22 50.0% +0.10 6–4 (60%) 6–7 (46%) 104.5 -0.91 1991 1581 115.5 — — — — -35 +106 -2 37.1% -0.81 3–5 (38%) 5–7 (42%) 96.0 -0.14
23 1996 1714 134.9 — — — — -34 -67 +161 48.1% +0.09 5–4 (56%) 4–5 (44%) 100.2 +0.41 1992 1707 141.5 — — — — -116 +108 — 54.0% +0.51 3–2 (60%) 2–4 (33%) 101.8 +0.07
24 1997 1774 137.0 — — — — -31 -189 +117 47.9% +0.10 8–7 (53%) 2–7 (22%) 99.3 -1.65 1993 1612 123.6 — — — — -42 +134 — 38.8% -0.58 5–6 (45%) 1–5 (17%) 95.7 +0.32
25 1998 1728 120.1 — — — — -72 -132 +210 41.5% -0.65 6–1 (86%) 5–7 (42%) 102.7 -0.25 1994 1631 135.0 — — — — 0 +60 — 48.2% -0.11 1–5 (17%) 3–4 (43%) 95.2 +0.74
26 1999 1628 117.1 — — — — -17 -126 +239 34.0% -1.19 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -1.78 1995 1617 117.8 — — — — -12 +72 — 38.9% -0.95 2–0 3–1 (75%) — -0.10
27 2000 1711 126.6 — — — — -8 -186 +166 53.5% +0.13 7–4 (64%) 4–3 (57%) 103.0 +0.23 1996 1574 110.6 — — — — — +57 — 20.0% -2.60 0–1 — — -0.29
28 2001 1690 122.8 — — — — -15 -187 +242 43.3% -0.55 8–3 (73%) 3–3 (50%) 101.2 -1.04 1997 1601 114.5 — — — — +11 +34 -44 32.4% -1.59 5–1 (83%) 1–1 — -0.08
29 2002 1613 100.3 — — — — -1 -157 +280 40.0% -0.60 1–2 (33%) 0–4 (0%) 93.7 +0.42 1998 1556 112.7 — — — — +45 +4 — 24.0% -2.32 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — -0.45
Career — 1808 135.6 — — — — -26 -145 +138 46.8% -0.19 59–52 (53%) 34–51 (40%) 97.2 -0.73 — 1756 130.7 — — — — -44 +58 -41 43.1% -0.53 42–40 (51%) 26–33 (44%) 100.9 +0.47

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.