H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Miriam Oremans vs Zina Garrison H2H: 0-1

Zina Garrison holds a 1–0 lead over Miriam Oremans in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Zina Garrison leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Zina Garrison won the 1994 Sydney third round 7-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Miriam Oremans
NED Age 53 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Zina Garrison
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 13, 1994* Sydney WTA 500 R32 Hard Zina Garrison #14 7-6 6-2 Miriam Oremans #31 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Miriam Oremans #193 #25 585 1,809 161 181 47.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Zina Garrison #318 #4 134 2,142 581 268 68.4% 0 0 0 1 14 15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Miriam Oremans Zina Garrison
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1980 2–2 50.0% — 1,529 0 1
17 1990 1–1 50.0% #185 1,519 0 0 1981 5–5 50.0% — 1,568 0 1
18 1991 3–9 25.0% #149 1,471 0 0 1982 23–15 60.5% — 1,853 0 1
19 1992 8–12 40.0% #130 1,532 0 0 1983 38–18 67.9% — 1,989 0 1
20 1993 28–20 58.3% #31 1,747 0 0 1984 47–20 70.1% #9 2,012 0 2
21 1994 14–18 43.8% #48 1,733 0 0 1985 51–18 73.9% #8 2,032 0 4
22 1995 19–18 51.4% #42 1,769 0 0 1986 48–22 68.6% #11 1,999 0 5
23 1996 17–18 48.6% #46 1,714 0 0 1987 44–17 72.1% #9 1,987 0 7
24 1997 15–15 50.0% #46 1,774 0 0 1988 49–20 71.0% #9 2,021 0 7
25 1998 13–16 44.8% #57 1,729 0 0 1989 60–15 80.0% #4 2,130 0 10
26 1999 8–17 32.0% #98 1,628 0 0 1990 48–18 72.7% #10 2,039 0 11
27 2000 16–12 57.1% #64 1,701 0 0 1991 37–18 67.3% #12 1,963 0 11
28 2001 13–15 46.4% #84 1,686 0 0 1992 36–19 65.5% #18 1,924 0 12
29 2002 6–10 37.5% #124 1,611 0 0 1993 43–19 69.4% #14 1,995 0 14
30 — — — — — — — 1994 24–16 60.0% #24 1,889 0 14
31 — — — — — — — 1995 25–16 61.0% #22 1,868 0 15
32 — — — — — — — 1996 1–10 9.1% #273 1,704 0 15