H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Miriam Oremans vs Zina Garrison H2H: 0-1

Zina Garrison holds a 1–0 lead over Miriam Oremans in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Zina Garrison leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Zina Garrison won the 1994 Sydney International round of 32 7-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Miriam Oremans
NED Age 54 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Zina Garrison
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Zina Garrison #14 7-6 6-2 Miriam Oremans #31 Match data Jan 13, 1994* R32 Sydney International Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Miriam Oremans #193 #25 585 1,808 162 182 47.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Zina Garrison #318 #4 134 2,146 584 270 68.4% 0 0 0 2 13 15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Miriam Oremans Zina Garrison
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1980 2–2 50.0% — 1,529 0 1
17 1990 1–1 50.0% #185 1,519 0 0 1981 5–5 50.0% — 1,569 0 1
18 1991 3–9 25.0% #149 1,472 0 0 1982 23–15 60.5% — 1,853 0 1
19 1992 8–12 40.0% #130 1,531 0 0 1983 38–18 67.9% #10 1,990 0 1
20 1993 28–20 58.3% #31 1,746 0 0 1984 47–20 70.1% #9 2,012 0 2
21 1994 14–18 43.8% #48 1,733 0 0 1985 51–18 73.9% #8 2,033 0 4
22 1995 19–18 51.4% #42 1,768 0 0 1986 48–22 68.6% #11 2,000 0 5
23 1996 17–18 48.6% #46 1,714 0 0 1987 44–17 72.1% #9 1,988 0 7
24 1997 15–15 50.0% #46 1,773 0 0 1988 52–21 71.2% #9 2,043 0 7
25 1998 13–16 44.8% #57 1,728 0 0 1989 60–15 80.0% #4 2,135 0 10
26 1999 8–17 32.0% #98 1,627 0 0 1990 48–18 72.7% #10 2,041 0 11
27 2000 17–13 56.7% #64 1,711 0 0 1991 37–18 67.3% #12 1,963 0 11
28 2001 13–15 46.4% #84 1,690 0 0 1992 36–20 64.3% #18 1,915 0 12
29 2002 6–10 37.5% #124 1,613 0 0 1993 43–19 69.4% #14 1,995 0 14
30 — — — — — — — 1994 24–16 60.0% #24 1,888 0 14
31 — — — — — — — 1995 25–16 61.0% #22 1,868 0 15
32 — — — — — — — 1996 1–10 9.1% #273 1,711 0 15

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Miriam Oremans Zina Garrison
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
17 1990 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 3 3 6 50.0%
18 1991 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1982 5 4 9 55.6% 7 3 10 70.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 0 3 3 0.0%
19 1992 6 6 12 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1983 6 2 8 75.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 13 5 18 72.2% 8 5 13 61.5%
20 1993 16 14 30 53.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1984 11 3 14 78.6% 15 6 21 71.4% 6 5 11 54.5% 15 6 21 71.4%
21 1994 5 9 14 35.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 2 5 60.0% 1985 14 3 17 82.4% 12 4 16 75.0% 11 4 15 73.3% 14 7 21 66.7%
22 1995 7 8 15 46.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 1986 21 5 26 80.8% 7 5 12 58.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 16 10 26 61.5%
23 1996 2 6 8 25.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 1987 15 5 20 75.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 8 1 9 88.9% 13 7 20 65.0%
24 1997 3 5 8 37.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 3 8 62.5% 1988 28 10 38 73.7% 13 6 19 68.4% 9 3 12 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
25 1998 1 6 7 14.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1989 30 6 36 83.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 12 3 15 80.0% 15 4 19 78.9%
26 1999 2 7 9 22.2% 0 5 5 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 1990 18 6 24 75.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 12 2 14 85.7% 12 6 18 66.7%
27 2000 10 6 16 62.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1991 18 8 26 69.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 10 5 15 66.7%
28 2001 5 8 13 38.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 1992 18 6 24 75.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 5 3 8 62.5% 8 7 15 53.3%
29 2002 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1993 22 8 30 73.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 12 5 17 70.6%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 12 7 19 63.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 7 6 13 53.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 8 4 12 66.7%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0%
Career — 61 85 146 41.8% 28 43 71 39.4% 53 33 86 61.6% 20 21 41 48.8% — 225 86 311 72.3% 90 58 148 60.8% 123 41 164 75.0% 142 83 225 63.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Miriam Oremans Zina Garrison
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1529 117.3 — — — — +48 — — 55.6% +0.56 0–1 — — +0.25
17 1990 1520 110.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.60 1–0 — — -0.11 1981 1570 122.3 — — — — +74 — — 54.5% +0.55 2–2 (50%) — — +1.08
18 1991 1472 101.8 — — — — +51 +51 — 29.6% -1.00 1–2 (33%) — — +0.66 1982 1854 155.0 — — — — -185 -170 -50 57.5% +0.46 7–4 (64%) 4–3 (57%) 108.3 -5.41
19 1992 1532 111.4 — — — — +48 — -24 38.6% -0.80 3–1 (75%) 0–1 — +0.45 1983 1991 154.6 — — — — -125 -109 -50 65.0% +0.87 7–2 (78%) 7–6 (54%) 108.1 -2.31
20 1993 1747 146.5 — — — — -74 -220 +26 59.1% +0.56 7–14 (33%) 4–6 (40%) 97.4 +0.65 1984 2013 157.3 — — — — +15 -96 -60 65.1% +1.21 12–7 (63%) 7–2 (78%) 105.1 +0.09
21 1994 1733 131.3 — — — — -44 -192 +24 46.8% -0.26 5–8 (38%) 5–7 (42%) 96.7 +0.41 1985 2033 160.2 — — — — +49 -57 -42 67.7% +1.56 15–5 (75%) 4–11 (27%) 96.5 +1.14
22 1995 1769 143.9 — — — — -10 -170 -22 50.0% +0.10 6–4 (60%) 6–7 (46%) 104.5 -0.91 1986 2001 159.2 — — — — +95 -126 -21 66.0% +1.22 10–7 (59%) 8–6 (57%) 98.3 -1.84
23 1996 1714 134.9 — — — — -34 -67 +161 48.1% +0.09 5–4 (56%) 4–5 (44%) 100.2 +0.41 1987 1988 166.8 — — — — +36 -60 +137 69.6% +1.50 7–6 (54%) 6–4 (60%) 100.4 -2.77
24 1997 1774 137.0 — — — — -31 -189 +117 47.9% +0.10 8–7 (53%) 2–7 (22%) 99.3 -1.65 1988 2043 162.0 — — — — +19 -89 +75 68.1% +1.43 9–7 (56%) 7–3 (70%) 101.1 -4.39
25 1998 1728 120.1 — — — — -72 -132 +210 41.5% -0.65 6–1 (86%) 5–7 (42%) 102.7 -0.25 1989 2135 170.0 — — — — +59 -212 -20 76.4% +2.14 8–7 (53%) 10–3 (77%) 101.5 -0.28
26 1999 1628 117.1 — — — — -17 -126 +239 34.0% -1.19 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -1.78 1990 2041 161.7 — — — — +14 -144 +213 68.5% +1.50 11–10 (52%) 4–5 (44%) 95.8 -1.68
27 2000 1711 126.6 — — — — -8 -186 +166 53.5% +0.13 7–4 (64%) 4–3 (57%) 103.0 +0.23 1991 1964 153.9 — — — — +30 -134 +240 63.1% +0.89 9–5 (64%) 3–3 (50%) 98.7 +1.03
28 2001 1690 122.8 — — — — -15 -187 +242 43.3% -0.55 8–3 (73%) 3–3 (50%) 101.2 -1.04 1992 1915 157.8 — — — — +39 -53 +312 62.5% +0.84 9–7 (56%) 5–3 (63%) 97.2 +0.17
29 2002 1613 100.3 — — — — -1 -157 +280 40.0% -0.60 1–2 (33%) 0–4 (0%) 93.7 +0.42 1993 1996 160.6 — — — — +22 -217 +199 67.4% +1.23 8–7 (53%) 8–4 (67%) 100.2 +0.22
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1889 145.3 — — — — +24 -186 +259 54.3% +0.13 10–4 (71%) 7–2 (78%) 102.6 -0.25
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1868 147.9 — — — — +29 -240 +311 61.2% +0.83 6–10 (38%) 5–3 (63%) 91.6 +1.45
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1712 111.8 — — — — +23 — — 20.8% -1.50 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — +0.20
Career — 1808 135.6 — — — — -26 -145 +138 46.8% -0.19 59–52 (53%) 34–51 (40%) 97.2 -0.73 — 2146 164.6 — — — — +27 -112 +91 65.2% +1.16 131–94 (58%) 86–59 (59%) 101.4 -1.56

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.