H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Mirjana Lucic-Baroni vs Aleksandra Krunic H2H: 1-2
Aleksandra Krunic holds a 2–1 lead over Mirjana Lucic-Baroni in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Aleksandra Krunic leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Mirjana Lucic-Baroni won the 2017 Charleston second round 6-1 4-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 44
Right-Handed
181 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
SRB
Age 33
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 5, 2017* | Charleston | WTA 500 | R64 | Clay | Mirjana Lucic-Baroni | 6-1 4-6 6-3 | Aleksandra Krunic | Match data |
| Jun 9, 2016* | S-Hertogenbosch | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Aleksandra Krunic | 7-6(0) 6-1 | Mirjana Lucic-Baroni | Match data |
| Apr 30, 2015* | Prague | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Aleksandra Krunic | 3-6 7-6(4) 6-0 | Mirjana Lucic-Baroni | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mirjana Lucic-Baroni | #424 | #20 | 1,924 | 1,798 | 136 | 166 | 45.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Aleksandra Krunic | #470 | #39 | 1,210 | 1,771 | 86 | 117 | 42.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mirjana Lucic-Baroni | Aleksandra Krunic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1997 | 11–3 | 78.6% | #49 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1998 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #51 | 1,776 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1999 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #48 | 1,757 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2000 | 2–12 | 14.3% | #202 | 1,601 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #223 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2001 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #192 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #165 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2002 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #203 | 1,546 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #151 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #348 | 1,526 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #87 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #108 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #144 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #54 | 1,752 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #455 | 1,538 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #55 | 1,728 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #163 | 1,561 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #258 | 1,519 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2010 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #96 | 1,554 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #128 | 1,645 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2011 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #129 | 1,551 | 0 | 2 | 2022 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #115 | 1,636 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2012 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #105 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2013 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #110 | 1,563 | 0 | 2 | 2024 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #286 | 1,605 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2014 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #60 | 1,706 | 0 | 3 | 2025 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #468 | 1,567 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 2015 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #68 | 1,657 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2016 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #80 | 1,629 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2017 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #32 | 1,698 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2018 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #327 | 1,689 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |