H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Mirjana Lucic-Baroni vs Amy Frazier H2H: 0-1

Amy Frazier holds a 1–0 lead over Mirjana Lucic-Baroni in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Amy Frazier leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Amy Frazier won the 1998 Tokyo third round 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mirjana Lucic-Baroni
CRO Age 44 Right-Handed 181 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Amy Frazier
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 24, 1998* Tokyo WTA 500 R32 Hard Amy Frazier #63 6-2 6-3 Mirjana Lucic-Baroni #49 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mirjana Lucic-Baroni #424 #20 1,924 1,798 136 166 45.0% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Amy Frazier #450 #13 1,381 1,959 416 307 57.5% 0 0 0 3 5 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mirjana Lucic-Baroni Amy Frazier
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1987 3–4 42.9% #147 1,527 0 0
15 1997 11–3 78.6% #49 1,692 0 1 1988 12–15 44.4% #58 1,638 0 0
16 1998 15–11 57.7% #51 1,776 0 2 1989 23–15 60.5% #33 1,725 0 1
17 1999 11–13 45.8% #48 1,757 0 2 1990 31–14 68.9% #16 1,893 0 2
18 2000 2–12 14.3% #202 1,601 0 2 1991 25–18 58.1% #28 1,813 0 2
19 2001 2–3 40.0% #192 1,596 0 2 1992 33–17 66.0% #19 1,842 0 3
20 2002 1–6 14.3% #203 1,546 0 2 1993 10–9 52.6% #39 1,843 0 3
21 2003 0–2 0.0% #348 1,526 0 2 1994 28–15 65.1% #16 1,903 0 4
22 — — — — — — — 1995 26–15 63.4% #18 1,877 0 5
23 — — — — — — — 1996 20–16 55.6% #33 1,835 0 5
24 — — — — — — — 1997 17–17 50.0% #37 1,818 0 5
25 2007 1–1 50.0% #455 1,538 0 2 1998 12–13 48.0% #42 1,766 0 5
26 — — — — — — — 1999 31–19 62.0% #19 1,876 0 6
27 2009 0–1 0.0% #258 1,519 0 2 2000 30–22 57.7% #20 1,852 0 6
28 2010 5–6 45.5% #96 1,554 0 2 2001 19–19 50.0% #48 1,695 0 6
29 2011 8–14 36.4% #129 1,551 0 2 2002 19–18 51.4% #39 1,757 0 6
30 2012 7–12 36.8% #105 1,535 0 2 2003 14–13 51.9% #61 1,746 0 6
31 2013 8–11 42.1% #110 1,563 0 2 2004 35–17 67.3% #26 1,828 0 7
32 2014 12–8 60.0% #60 1,706 0 3 2005 18–16 52.9% #52 1,730 0 8
33 2015 17–26 39.5% #68 1,657 0 3 2006 10–15 40.0% #130 1,626 0 8
34 2016 14–18 43.8% #80 1,629 0 3 — — — — — — —
35 2017 20–16 55.6% #32 1,698 0 3 — — — — — — —
36 2018 2–3 40.0% #327 1,689 0 3 — — — — — — —