H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Mirjana Lucic-Baroni vs Amy Frazier H2H: 0-1

Amy Frazier holds a 1–0 lead over Mirjana Lucic-Baroni in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Amy Frazier leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Amy Frazier won the 1998 Toyota Princess Cup round of 32 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mirjana Lucic-Baroni
CRO Age 44 Right-Handed 181 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Amy Frazier
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Amy Frazier #63 6-2 6-3 Mirjana Lucic-Baroni #49 Match data Sep 24, 1998* R32 Toyota Princess Cup Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mirjana Lucic-Baroni #424 #20 1,924 1,798 136 166 45.0% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Amy Frazier #450 #13 1,381 1,956 416 307 57.5% 0 0 0 1 7 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mirjana Lucic-Baroni Amy Frazier
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1987 3–4 42.9% #147 1,527 0 0
15 1997 11–3 78.6% #49 1,676 0 1 1988 12–15 44.4% #58 1,636 0 0
16 1998 15–11 57.7% #51 1,768 0 2 1989 23–15 60.5% #33 1,717 0 1
17 1999 11–13 45.8% #48 1,753 0 2 1990 31–14 68.9% #16 1,891 0 2
18 2000 2–12 14.3% #202 1,599 0 2 1991 25–18 58.1% #28 1,812 0 2
19 2001 2–3 40.0% #192 1,595 0 2 1992 33–17 66.0% #19 1,843 0 3
20 2002 1–6 14.3% #203 1,545 0 2 1993 10–9 52.6% #39 1,844 0 3
21 2003 0–2 0.0% #348 1,524 0 2 1994 28–15 65.1% #16 1,903 0 4
22 — — — — — — — 1995 26–15 63.4% #18 1,876 0 5
23 — — — — — — — 1996 20–16 55.6% #33 1,836 0 5
24 — — — — — — — 1997 17–17 50.0% #37 1,819 0 5
25 2007 1–1 50.0% #455 1,537 0 2 1998 12–13 48.0% #42 1,766 0 5
26 — — — — — — — 1999 31–19 62.0% #19 1,877 0 6
27 2009 0–1 0.0% #258 1,518 0 2 2000 30–22 57.7% #20 1,853 0 6
28 2010 5–6 45.5% #96 1,554 0 2 2001 19–19 50.0% #48 1,696 0 6
29 2011 8–14 36.4% #129 1,551 0 2 2002 19–18 51.4% #39 1,757 0 6
30 2012 7–12 36.8% #105 1,535 0 2 2003 14–13 51.9% #61 1,726 0 6
31 2013 8–11 42.1% #110 1,562 0 2 2004 35–17 67.3% #26 1,825 0 7
32 2014 12–8 60.0% #60 1,706 0 3 2005 18–16 52.9% #52 1,729 0 8
33 2015 17–26 39.5% #68 1,633 0 3 2006 10–15 40.0% #130 1,626 0 8
34 2016 14–18 43.8% #80 1,625 0 3 — — — — — — —
35 2017 20–16 55.6% #32 1,699 0 3 — — — — — — —
36 2018 2–3 40.0% #327 1,690 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mirjana Lucic-Baroni Amy Frazier
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
15 1997 2 1 3 66.7% 9 1 10 90.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1988 9 10 19 47.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
16 1998 4 7 11 36.4% 10 2 12 83.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1989 21 9 30 70.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
17 1999 5 8 13 38.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 1990 21 9 30 70.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 7 3 10 70.0%
18 2000 1 6 7 14.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1991 17 12 29 58.6% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
19 2001 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 1992 22 10 32 68.8% 5 1 6 83.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
20 2002 0 5 5 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1993 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — — — — — 4 4 8 50.0%
21 2003 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 23 8 31 74.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 19 9 28 67.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 13 8 21 61.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 11 10 21 52.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0%
25 2007 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 10 10 20 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 25 14 39 64.1% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
27 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 25 13 38 65.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
28 2010 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2001 10 10 20 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
29 2011 2 6 8 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2002 14 12 26 53.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
30 2012 3 6 9 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2003 11 8 19 57.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
31 2013 2 5 7 28.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2004 27 11 38 71.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
32 2014 11 4 15 73.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2005 14 10 24 58.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
33 2015 12 18 30 40.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2006 8 10 18 44.4% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
34 2016 5 11 16 31.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 14 9 23 60.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2018 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 66 98 164 40.2% 49 42 91 53.8% 21 24 45 46.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — 306 190 496 61.7% 38 44 82 46.3% 30 33 63 47.6% 42 40 82 51.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 130/155 of Mirjana Lucic-Baroni's and 34/138 of Amy Frazier's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Mirjana Lucic-Baroni Amy Frazier
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 4/27 1.0 7.0 57.0% 59.8% 36.6% 49.3% 62.5% 49.5% 44.1%
31 2013 9/19 4.1 4.1 56.7% 68.4% 48.1% 53.6% 49.9% 59.4% 41.5% 2004 9/52 1.4 8.3 61.0% 61.2% 46.0% 41.9% 48.0% 55.3% 48.1%
32 2014 20/20 4.3 5.3 53.7% 68.8% 48.0% 62.8% 45.7% 59.1% 44.5% 2005 6/34 0.8 7.2 60.1% 58.3% 35.6% 43.8% 42.1% 49.2% 47.8%
33 2015 29/43 3.6 6.9 56.7% 63.3% 46.8% 46.1% 48.6% 56.4% 38.2% 2006 15/25 1.3 6.9 55.9% 60.7% 44.1% 51.4% 50.8% 53.1% 41.9%
34 2016 31/32 2.5 6.3 55.5% 65.0% 41.4% 44.4% 54.4% 54.7% 47.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 36/36 3.2 6.6 57.5% 64.6% 41.2% 51.9% 58.5% 54.6% 43.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2018 5/5 1.4 5.2 54.9% 60.4% 37.5% 48.1% 68.9% 50.9% 37.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 130/302 3.3 6.2 56.1% 65.1% 43.9% 50.4% 53.2% 55.9% 43.1% — 34/723 1.2 7.3 58.1% 60.3% 42.2% 47.3% 49.9% 52.6% 44.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mirjana Lucic-Baroni Amy Frazier
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1527 108.1 — — — — — +47 — 40.0% -0.80 1–0 — — +0.61
15 1997 1676 143.4 — — — — -116 +86 — 67.7% +1.23 4–1 (80%) 3–2 (60%) 105.4 +0.12 1988 1637 125.6 — — — — +7 -79 -84 44.4% -0.51 5–4 (56%) 3–2 (60%) — +0.73
16 1998 1769 134.7 — — — — -188 +120 — 52.6% +0.37 5–2 (71%) 2–4 (33%) 101.1 +0.58 1989 1717 128.7 — — — — +48 -175 -186 56.5% +0.39 7–4 (64%) 4–3 (57%) 105.6 +1.67
17 1999 1754 132.9 — — — — -144 — -16 45.6% -0.53 5–4 (56%) 4–2 (67%) 107.0 -0.60 1990 1892 153.8 — — — — +24 — -294 63.3% +0.94 12–7 (63%) 6–4 (60%) 102.4 -1.37
18 2000 1599 100.7 — — — — -42 +102 +114 19.4% -2.00 1–2 (33%) 0–3 (0%) 95.6 -0.28 1991 1813 142.7 — — — — +14 — -146 57.3% +0.55 5–5 (50%) 5–6 (45%) 96.5 +3.08
19 2001 1595 108.4 — — — — — +137 — 36.4% -0.27 1–0 0–1 — -0.02 1992 1844 151.1 — — — — +7 -184 -136 62.7% +0.93 7–5 (58%) 9–3 (75%) 105.5 +0.93
20 2002 1545 104.2 — — — — -70 — — 20.0% -2.53 0–1 0–1 — -0.26 1993 1845 143.2 — — — — +1 — — 50.0% -0.02 3–1 (75%) 2–2 (50%) 102.6 +0.29
21 2003 1525 101.6 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.60 0–1 — — -0.09 1994 1904 156.1 — — — — +63 -246 — 61.7% +0.73 6–4 (60%) 5–2 (71%) 103.2 -0.10
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1877 148.4 — — — — +50 -219 — 62.6% +0.87 4–5 (44%) 4–1 (80%) 99.3 +0.40
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1836 148.1 — — — — +37 — -100 57.1% +0.57 3–4 (43%) 5–3 (63%) 97.6 +0.72
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1819 152.4 — — — — +41 -182 -89 52.6% +0.18 2–6 (25%) 3–5 (38%) 94.6 -2.18
25 2007 1537 109.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.75 — 1–0 — -0.13 1998 1766 134.9 — — — — +18 — — 49.2% +0.03 6–7 (46%) 3–2 (60%) 96.6 +0.87
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1877 154.2 — — — — +23 -198 — 57.8% +0.40 11–7 (61%) 5–4 (56%) 101.8 -1.53
27 2009 1518 97.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.18 2000 1854 148.5 — — — — +35 -256 -228 55.7% +0.28 10–8 (56%) 10–4 (71%) 104.0 -0.80
28 2010 1554 111.8 — — — — -70 — +160 44.4% -0.52 3–2 (60%) 3–1 (75%) — -0.12 2001 1696 121.2 — — — — +25 -40 -41 49.4% -0.45 5–6 (45%) 4–2 (67%) 99.7 +3.27
29 2011 1551 110.1 — — — — -82 +119 +144 41.2% -0.96 2–5 (29%) 5–2 (71%) 100.3 -0.83 2002 1758 137.9 — — — — -7 -98 -102 48.8% +0.10 8–6 (57%) 2–5 (29%) 99.6 -1.62
30 2012 1535 107.2 — — — — -72 +122 +176 39.1% -1.13 4–4 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 98.2 +0.36 2003 1727 129.3 -1.13 +0.72 0.874 46.8% +3 -101 -29 46.4% -0.07 4–2 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 100.5 -0.74
31 2013 1562 122.6 +0.65 -0.89 1.023 51.1% -102 +80 +154 47.5% +0.25 1–3 (25%) 0–3 (0%) 95.1 -0.31 2004 1826 140.0 +0.10 +2.08 1.076 51.4% -2 -150 -98 63.9% +0.95 9–6 (60%) 3–6 (33%) 99.8 +0.72
32 2014 1707 129.5 +2.54 +0.56 1.087 51.8% -37 -115 — 59.5% +0.71 3–1 (75%) 3–4 (43%) 103.2 -0.45 2005 1730 125.0 -2.39 +1.34 0.941 48.4% +41 -85 -50 51.9% +0.28 6–5 (55%) 3–3 (50%) 97.8 +1.05
33 2015 1634 127.2 -1.64 -2.22 0.875 47.8% -4 -66 +47 43.0% -0.22 7–12 (37%) 2–10 (17%) 93.1 -0.40 2006 1627 115.5 -1.77 -1.22 0.893 47.7% +45 -57 +111 39.3% -0.70 4–2 (67%) 3–5 (38%) 98.5 -0.09
34 2016 1625 127.9 -1.32 +3.68 1.050 51.1% -46 +79 -10 47.9% +0.14 3–6 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 95.8 -0.85 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 1699 137.2 -0.69 +1.19 0.960 49.5% +14 +54 — 52.4% +0.08 10–6 (63%) 3–5 (38%) 101.6 -0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2018 1690 108.4 -2.20 -1.43 0.772 44.8% +7 — — 40.0% -0.60 2–0 1–0 — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1799 132.5 -0.52 +0.68 0.977 49.8% -54 +70 +84 45.8% -0.27 51–50 (50%) 31–45 (41%) 97.4 -1.09 — 1957 149.8 -1.31 +0.33 0.945 48.7% +26 -129 -114 55.5% +0.36 118–94 (56%) 81–65 (55%) 103.1 +0.82

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.