H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Mirjana Lucic-Baroni vs Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario H2H: 0-1
Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario holds a 1–0 lead over Mirjana Lucic-Baroni in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario won the 1999 Roland Garros first round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 44
Right-Handed
181 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 54
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 1999* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | 6-2 6-2 | Mirjana Lucic-Baroni | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mirjana Lucic-Baroni | #424 | #20 | 1,924 | 1,798 | 136 | 166 | 45.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | #52 | #1 | 3,768 | 2,385 | 708 | 267 | 72.6% | 4 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 17 | 29 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mirjana Lucic-Baroni | Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #81 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | 1997 | 11–3 | 78.6% | #49 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #54 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1998 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #51 | 1,776 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 31–15 | 67.4% | #18 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 1999 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #48 | 1,757 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 47–13 | 78.3% | #5 | 2,068 | 1 | 3 |
| 18 | 2000 | 2–12 | 14.3% | #202 | 1,601 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 38–14 | 73.1% | #7 | 2,081 | 1 | 5 |
| 19 | 2001 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #192 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 56–15 | 78.9% | #5 | 2,166 | 1 | 6 |
| 20 | 2002 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #203 | 1,546 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 59–15 | 79.7% | #4 | 2,288 | 1 | 8 |
| 21 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #348 | 1,526 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 72–14 | 83.7% | #2 | 2,248 | 1 | 12 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 69–9 | 88.5% | #2 | 2,333 | 3 | 20 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 47–13 | 78.3% | #3 | 2,156 | 3 | 22 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 52–16 | 76.5% | #3 | 2,106 | 3 | 24 |
| 25 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #455 | 1,538 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 45–22 | 67.2% | #9 | 2,022 | 3 | 24 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 47–17 | 73.4% | #4 | 2,039 | 4 | 26 |
| 27 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #258 | 1,519 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #17 | 1,932 | 4 | 27 |
| 28 | 2010 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #96 | 1,554 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 38–18 | 67.9% | #8 | 1,930 | 4 | 27 |
| 29 | 2011 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #129 | 1,551 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 34–22 | 60.7% | #17 | 1,795 | 4 | 29 |
| 30 | 2012 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #105 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #53 | 1,634 | 4 | 29 |
| 31 | 2013 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #110 | 1,563 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2014 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #60 | 1,706 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2015 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #68 | 1,657 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2016 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #80 | 1,629 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2017 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #32 | 1,698 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2018 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #327 | 1,689 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |