H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Mirjana Lucic-Baroni vs Eva Bes Ostariz H2H: 1-0

Mirjana Lucic-Baroni holds a 1–0 lead over Eva Bes Ostariz in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mirjana Lucic-Baroni leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mirjana Lucic-Baroni won the 2001 Roland Garros round of 64 6-1 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mirjana Lucic-Baroni
CRO Age 44 Right-Handed 181 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Eva Bes Ostariz
ESP Age 53 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mirjana Lucic-Baroni #232 6-1 6-3 Eva Bes Ostariz Match data May 31, 2001* R64 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mirjana Lucic-Baroni #424 #20 1,924 1,798 136 166 45.0% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Eva Bes Ostariz — — — 1,523 14 28 33.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mirjana Lucic-Baroni Eva Bes Ostariz
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1997 11–3 78.6% #49 1,676 0 1 — — — — — — —
16 1998 15–11 57.7% #51 1,768 0 2 — — — — — — —
17 1999 11–13 45.8% #48 1,753 0 2 — — — — — — —
18 2000 2–12 14.3% #202 1,599 0 2 — — — — — — —
19 2001 2–3 40.0% #192 1,595 0 2 1992 0–2 0.0% — 1,474 0 0
20 2002 1–6 14.3% #203 1,545 0 2 — — — — — — —
21 2003 0–2 0.0% #348 1,524 0 2 — — — — — — —
25 2007 1–1 50.0% #455 1,537 0 2 1998 1–3 25.0% — 1,473 0 0
26 — — — — — — — 1999 2–6 25.0% — 1,433 0 0
27 2009 0–1 0.0% #258 1,518 0 2 2000 0–2 0.0% — 1,411 0 0
28 2010 5–6 45.5% #96 1,554 0 2 2001 7–5 58.3% — 1,508 0 0
29 2011 8–14 36.4% #129 1,551 0 2 2002 4–10 28.6% — 1,485 0 0
30 2012 7–12 36.8% #105 1,535 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 2013 8–11 42.1% #110 1,562 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2014 12–8 60.0% #60 1,706 0 3 — — — — — — —
33 2015 17–26 39.5% #68 1,633 0 3 — — — — — — —
34 2016 14–18 43.8% #80 1,625 0 3 — — — — — — —
35 2017 20–16 55.6% #32 1,699 0 3 — — — — — — —
36 2018 2–3 40.0% #327 1,690 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mirjana Lucic-Baroni Eva Bes Ostariz
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1997 2 1 3 66.7% 9 1 10 90.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1998 4 7 11 36.4% 10 2 12 83.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1999 5 8 13 38.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2000 1 6 7 14.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 1992 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2002 0 5 5 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2003 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2007 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 0 1 1 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — —
27 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2010 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2001 1 1 2 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — —
29 2011 2 6 8 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2002 0 1 1 0.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 2012 3 6 9 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 2 5 7 28.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 11 4 15 73.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2015 12 18 30 40.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2016 5 11 16 31.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 14 9 23 60.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2018 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 66 98 164 40.2% 49 42 91 53.8% 21 24 45 46.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — 1 3 4 25.0% 13 24 37 35.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mirjana Lucic-Baroni Eva Bes Ostariz
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1997 1676 143.4 — — — — -116 +86 — 67.7% +1.23 4–1 (80%) 3–2 (60%) 105.4 +0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1998 1769 134.7 — — — — -188 +120 — 52.6% +0.37 5–2 (71%) 2–4 (33%) 101.1 +0.58 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1999 1754 132.9 — — — — -144 — -16 45.6% -0.53 5–4 (56%) 4–2 (67%) 107.0 -0.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2000 1599 100.7 — — — — -42 +102 +114 19.4% -2.00 1–2 (33%) 0–3 (0%) 95.6 -0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 1595 108.4 — — — — — +137 — 36.4% -0.27 1–0 0–1 — -0.02 1992 1475 96.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.05
20 2002 1545 104.2 — — — — -70 — — 20.0% -2.53 0–1 0–1 — -0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2003 1525 101.6 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.60 0–1 — — -0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2007 1537 109.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.75 — 1–0 — -0.13 1998 1474 105.8 — — — — — +20 — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 0–2 — -0.25
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1434 97.6 — — — — — +23 — 31.6% -1.16 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — +0.48
27 2009 1518 97.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.18 2000 1412 98.3 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.20 0–1 — — +0.10
28 2010 1554 111.8 — — — — -70 — +160 44.4% -0.52 3–2 (60%) 3–1 (75%) — -0.12 2001 1508 112.5 — — — — — +9 — 51.7% +0.14 4–1 (80%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.60
29 2011 1551 110.1 — — — — -82 +119 +144 41.2% -0.96 2–5 (29%) 5–2 (71%) 100.3 -0.83 2002 1485 108.2 — — — — — +28 — 33.3% -1.48 2–3 (40%) 1–0 — -0.01
30 2012 1535 107.2 — — — — -72 +122 +176 39.1% -1.13 4–4 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 98.2 +0.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 1562 122.6 +0.65 -0.89 1.023 51.1% -102 +80 +154 47.5% +0.25 1–3 (25%) 0–3 (0%) 95.1 -0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 1707 129.5 +2.54 +0.56 1.087 51.8% -37 -115 — 59.5% +0.71 3–1 (75%) 3–4 (43%) 103.2 -0.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2015 1634 127.2 -1.64 -2.22 0.875 47.8% -4 -66 +47 43.0% -0.22 7–12 (37%) 2–10 (17%) 93.1 -0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2016 1625 127.9 -1.32 +3.68 1.050 51.1% -46 +79 -10 47.9% +0.14 3–6 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 95.8 -0.85 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 1699 137.2 -0.69 +1.19 0.960 49.5% +14 +54 — 52.4% +0.08 10–6 (63%) 3–5 (38%) 101.6 -0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2018 1690 108.4 -2.20 -1.43 0.772 44.8% +7 — — 40.0% -0.60 2–0 1–0 — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1799 132.5 -0.52 +0.68 0.977 49.8% -54 +70 +84 45.8% -0.27 51–50 (50%) 31–45 (41%) 97.4 -1.09 — 1523 107.2 — — — — — +20 — 36.4% -0.94 7–8 (47%) 2–5 (29%) 98.5 +2.31

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.