H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Mirjana Lucic-Baroni vs Irina Falconi Hartman H2H: 1-0
Mirjana Lucic-Baroni holds a 1–0 lead over Irina Falconi Hartman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mirjana Lucic-Baroni leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mirjana Lucic-Baroni won the 2016 Acapulco third round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 44
Right-Handed
181 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2016* | Acapulco | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Mirjana Lucic-Baroni | 6-2 6-3 | Irina Falconi Hartman | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mirjana Lucic-Baroni | #424 | #20 | 1,924 | 1,798 | 136 | 166 | 45.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Irina Falconi Hartman | #1,008 | #63 | 1,005 | 1,614 | 42 | 72 | 36.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Mirjana Lucic-Baroni | Irina Falconi Hartman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1997 | 11–3 | 78.6% | #49 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #51 | 1,776 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #84 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #48 | 1,757 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #151 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 2–12 | 14.3% | #202 | 1,601 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #144 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #192 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #112 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #203 | 1,546 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #76 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #348 | 1,526 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #99 | 1,560 | 0 | 1 |
| 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #455 | 1,538 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #129 | 1,497 | 0 | 1 |
| 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #258 | 1,519 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #271 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 |
| 2010 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #96 | 1,554 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #129 | 1,551 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #105 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #110 | 1,563 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #60 | 1,706 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #68 | 1,657 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #80 | 1,629 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #32 | 1,698 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #327 | 1,689 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |