H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Mirjana Lucic-Baroni vs Janet Lee H2H: 1-0

Mirjana Lucic-Baroni holds a 1–0 lead over Janet Lee in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mirjana Lucic-Baroni leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mirjana Lucic-Baroni won the 2000 Indian Wells Open round of 64 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mirjana Lucic-Baroni
CRO Age 44 Right-Handed 181 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Janet Lee
TPE Age 49 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mirjana Lucic-Baroni #47 6-2 6-4 Janet Lee #111 Match data Mar 15, 2000* R64 Indian Wells Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mirjana Lucic-Baroni #424 #20 1,924 1,798 136 166 45.0% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Janet Lee #863 #79 390 1,570 31 67 31.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mirjana Lucic-Baroni Janet Lee
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1997 11–3 78.6% #49 1,676 0 1 — — — — — — —
16 1998 15–11 57.7% #51 1,768 0 2 1993 0–1 0.0% #547 1,491 0 0
17 1999 11–13 45.8% #48 1,753 0 2 1994 1–2 33.3% #270 1,508 0 0
18 2000 2–12 14.3% #202 1,599 0 2 1995 4–7 36.4% #169 1,519 0 0
19 2001 2–3 40.0% #192 1,595 0 2 1996 0–2 0.0% #175 1,513 0 0
20 2002 1–6 14.3% #203 1,545 0 2 1997 3–4 42.9% #114 1,525 0 0
21 2003 0–2 0.0% #348 1,524 0 2 1998 4–14 22.2% #86 1,498 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 1999 5–10 33.3% #95 1,487 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 2000 5–8 38.5% #117 1,514 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 2001 7–9 43.8% #111 1,555 0 0
25 2007 1–1 50.0% #455 1,537 0 2 2002 1–6 14.3% #217 1,524 0 0
26 — — — — — — — 2003 1–3 25.0% #162 1,511 0 0
27 2009 0–1 0.0% #258 1,518 0 2 — — — — — — —
28 2010 5–6 45.5% #96 1,554 0 2 2005 0–1 0.0% #694 1,495 0 0
29 2011 8–14 36.4% #129 1,551 0 2 — — — — — — —
30 2012 7–12 36.8% #105 1,535 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 2013 8–11 42.1% #110 1,562 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2014 12–8 60.0% #60 1,706 0 3 — — — — — — —
33 2015 17–26 39.5% #68 1,633 0 3 — — — — — — —
34 2016 14–18 43.8% #80 1,625 0 3 — — — — — — —
35 2017 20–16 55.6% #32 1,699 0 3 — — — — — — —
36 2018 2–3 40.0% #327 1,690 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mirjana Lucic-Baroni Janet Lee
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1997 2 1 3 66.7% 9 1 10 90.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1998 4 7 11 36.4% 10 2 12 83.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1993 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1999 5 8 13 38.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 1994 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2000 1 6 7 14.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1995 3 3 6 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 2001 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 1996 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2002 0 5 5 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1997 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2003 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 3 10 13 23.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 4 5 9 44.4% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 5 7 12 41.7% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 6 8 14 42.9% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
25 2007 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
27 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2010 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2005 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2011 2 6 8 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2012 3 6 9 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 2 5 7 28.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 11 4 15 73.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2015 12 18 30 40.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2016 5 11 16 31.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 14 9 23 60.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2018 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 66 98 164 40.2% 49 42 91 53.8% 21 24 45 46.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — 26 46 72 36.1% 1 11 12 8.3% 4 8 12 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mirjana Lucic-Baroni Janet Lee
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1997 1676 143.4 — — — — -116 +86 — 67.7% +1.23 4–1 (80%) 3–2 (60%) 105.4 +0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1998 1769 134.7 — — — — -188 +120 — 52.6% +0.37 5–2 (71%) 2–4 (33%) 101.1 +0.58 1993 1492 98.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — +0.01
17 1999 1754 132.9 — — — — -144 — -16 45.6% -0.53 5–4 (56%) 4–2 (67%) 107.0 -0.60 1994 1508 115.6 — — — — +41 — — 28.6% -1.57 1–0 — — -0.45
18 2000 1599 100.7 — — — — -42 +102 +114 19.4% -2.00 1–2 (33%) 0–3 (0%) 95.6 -0.28 1995 1519 101.0 — — — — +57 +14 — 28.6% -2.14 1–0 3–0 (100%) — -0.04
19 2001 1595 108.4 — — — — — +137 — 36.4% -0.27 1–0 0–1 — -0.02 1996 1514 120.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — -0.48
20 2002 1545 104.2 — — — — -70 — — 20.0% -2.53 0–1 0–1 — -0.26 1997 1526 105.6 — — — — +53 — — 37.5% -1.13 2–0 0–1 — +0.41
21 2003 1525 101.6 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.60 0–1 — — -0.09 1998 1499 121.5 — — — — +38 — — 30.0% -1.10 0–6 (0%) 1–3 (25%) 92.7 -0.18
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1488 111.5 — — — — +57 -62 — 38.2% -0.50 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — +0.61
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1515 113.7 — — — — +33 — — 43.3% -0.40 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.34
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1556 116.3 — — — — +6 — — 47.2% +0.08 3–3 (50%) 0–2 — +0.01
25 2007 1537 109.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.75 — 1–0 — -0.13 2002 1525 103.5 — — — — +30 — — 13.3% -2.93 1–0 1–1 — -0.90
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1512 102.1 -0.98 -0.78 0.826 45.5% — — +13 33.3% -0.45 0–1 0–1 — +0.01
27 2009 1518 97.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2010 1554 111.8 — — — — -70 — +160 44.4% -0.52 3–2 (60%) 3–1 (75%) — -0.12 2005 1496 98.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.09
29 2011 1551 110.1 — — — — -82 +119 +144 41.2% -0.96 2–5 (29%) 5–2 (71%) 100.3 -0.83 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2012 1535 107.2 — — — — -72 +122 +176 39.1% -1.13 4–4 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 98.2 +0.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 1562 122.6 +0.65 -0.89 1.023 51.1% -102 +80 +154 47.5% +0.25 1–3 (25%) 0–3 (0%) 95.1 -0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 1707 129.5 +2.54 +0.56 1.087 51.8% -37 -115 — 59.5% +0.71 3–1 (75%) 3–4 (43%) 103.2 -0.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2015 1634 127.2 -1.64 -2.22 0.875 47.8% -4 -66 +47 43.0% -0.22 7–12 (37%) 2–10 (17%) 93.1 -0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2016 1625 127.9 -1.32 +3.68 1.050 51.1% -46 +79 -10 47.9% +0.14 3–6 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 95.8 -0.85 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 1699 137.2 -0.69 +1.19 0.960 49.5% +14 +54 — 52.4% +0.08 10–6 (63%) 3–5 (38%) 101.6 -0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2018 1690 108.4 -2.20 -1.43 0.772 44.8% +7 — — 40.0% -0.60 2–0 1–0 — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1799 132.5 -0.52 +0.68 0.977 49.8% -54 +70 +84 45.8% -0.27 51–50 (50%) 31–45 (41%) 97.4 -1.09 — 1571 119.1 -0.98 -0.78 0.826 45.5% +36 -24 +13 34.3% -1.01 10–16 (38%) 7–12 (37%) 93.8 -0.59

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.