H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Mirjana Lucic-Baroni vs Patty Schnyder H2H: 1-1
Mirjana Lucic-Baroni and Patty Schnyder are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Mirjana Lucic-Baroni won the 1999 Canadian Open second round 6-3 6-7 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 44
Right-Handed
181 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 47
Left-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 18, 1999* | Canadian Open | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Mirjana Lucic-Baroni | 6-3 6-7 6-3 | Patty Schnyder | Match data |
| Mar 21, 1999* | Key Biscayne | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Patty Schnyder | 6-3 6-4 | Mirjana Lucic-Baroni | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mirjana Lucic-Baroni | #424 | #20 | 1,924 | 1,798 | 136 | 166 | 45.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Patty Schnyder | #278 | #7 | 3,050 | 1,987 | 492 | 346 | 58.7% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mirjana Lucic-Baroni | Patty Schnyder | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1997 | 11–3 | 78.6% | #49 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1998 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #51 | 1,776 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #143 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1999 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #48 | 1,757 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #64 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2000 | 2–12 | 14.3% | #202 | 1,601 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #26 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2001 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #192 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 51–19 | 72.9% | #11 | 1,910 | 0 | 5 |
| 20 | 2002 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #203 | 1,546 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #21 | 1,793 | 0 | 6 |
| 21 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #348 | 1,526 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #25 | 1,751 | 0 | 6 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,734 | 0 | 7 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #15 | 1,848 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #23 | 1,818 | 0 | 8 |
| 25 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #455 | 1,538 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #14 | 1,793 | 0 | 8 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 58–25 | 69.9% | #7 | 1,928 | 0 | 10 |
| 27 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #258 | 1,519 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 47–25 | 65.3% | #9 | 1,898 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | 2010 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #96 | 1,554 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 45–26 | 63.4% | #16 | 1,879 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | 2011 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #129 | 1,551 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #14 | 1,827 | 0 | 11 |
| 30 | 2012 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #105 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #42 | 1,755 | 0 | 11 |
| 31 | 2013 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #110 | 1,563 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #44 | 1,799 | 0 | 11 |
| 32 | 2014 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #60 | 1,706 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #55 | 1,667 | 0 | 11 |
| 33 | 2015 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #68 | 1,657 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2016 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #80 | 1,629 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2017 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #32 | 1,698 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2018 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #327 | 1,689 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #324 | 1,631 | 0 | 11 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #148 | 1,627 | 0 | 11 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #278 | 1,597 | 0 | 11 |