H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Mirjana Lucic-Baroni vs Sandrine Testud H2H: 1-0

Mirjana Lucic-Baroni holds a 1–0 lead over Sandrine Testud in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mirjana Lucic-Baroni leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mirjana Lucic-Baroni won the 1998 Italian Open quarterfinal 7-5 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mirjana Lucic-Baroni
CRO Age 44 Right-Handed 181 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Sandrine Testud
FRA Age 54 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mirjana Lucic-Baroni #47 7-5 (ret.) Sandrine Testud #13 Match data May 9, 1998* QF Italian Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mirjana Lucic-Baroni #424 #20 1,924 1,798 136 166 45.0% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Sandrine Testud #1,203 #9 2,233 2,003 309 237 56.6% 0 0 0 1 2 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mirjana Lucic-Baroni Sandrine Testud
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1997 11–3 78.6% #49 1,676 0 1 — — — — — — —
16 1998 15–11 57.7% #51 1,768 0 2 — — — — — — —
17 1999 11–13 45.8% #48 1,753 0 2 — — — — — — —
18 2000 2–12 14.3% #202 1,599 0 2 1990 0–2 0.0% #170 1,484 0 0
19 2001 2–3 40.0% #192 1,595 0 2 1991 8–10 44.4% #109 1,549 0 0
20 2002 1–6 14.3% #203 1,545 0 2 1992 11–17 39.3% #106 1,568 0 0
21 2003 0–2 0.0% #348 1,524 0 2 1993 11–19 36.7% #100 1,561 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 1994 10–14 41.7% #81 1,604 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 1995 19–16 54.3% #41 1,736 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 1996 21–17 55.3% #41 1,774 0 0
25 2007 1–1 50.0% #455 1,537 0 2 1997 41–22 65.1% #14 1,920 0 1
26 — — — — — — — 1998 51–26 66.2% #14 1,945 0 2
27 2009 0–1 0.0% #258 1,518 0 2 1999 36–25 59.0% #13 1,900 0 2
28 2010 5–6 45.5% #96 1,554 0 2 2000 30–20 60.0% #17 1,917 0 2
29 2011 8–14 36.4% #129 1,551 0 2 2001 53–27 66.2% #11 1,977 0 3
30 2012 7–12 36.8% #105 1,535 0 2 2002 17–14 54.8% #38 1,846 0 3
31 2013 8–11 42.1% #110 1,562 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2014 12–8 60.0% #60 1,706 0 3 2004 1–8 11.1% #313 1,725 0 3
33 2015 17–26 39.5% #68 1,633 0 3 — — — — — — —
34 2016 14–18 43.8% #80 1,625 0 3 — — — — — — —
35 2017 20–16 55.6% #32 1,699 0 3 — — — — — — —
36 2018 2–3 40.0% #327 1,690 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mirjana Lucic-Baroni Sandrine Testud
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1997 2 1 3 66.7% 9 1 10 90.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1998 4 7 11 36.4% 10 2 12 83.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1999 5 8 13 38.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2000 1 6 7 14.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1990 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 2001 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 1991 2 2 4 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0%
20 2002 0 5 5 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1992 7 9 16 43.8% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2003 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 8 11 19 42.1% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 9 10 19 47.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 12 9 21 57.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 14 9 23 60.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2007 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 20 10 30 66.7% 12 5 17 70.6% 3 1 4 75.0% 6 6 12 50.0%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 26 12 38 68.4% 16 8 24 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 4 8 50.0%
27 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 20 12 32 62.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 9 7 16 56.3%
28 2010 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2000 20 10 30 66.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1%
29 2011 2 6 8 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2001 39 17 56 69.6% 10 6 16 62.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
30 2012 3 6 9 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2002 5 5 10 50.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
31 2013 2 5 7 28.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 11 4 15 73.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2004 1 2 3 33.3% 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
33 2015 12 18 30 40.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2016 5 11 16 31.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 14 9 23 60.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2018 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 66 98 164 40.2% 49 42 91 53.8% 21 24 45 46.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — 183 118 301 60.8% 78 66 144 54.2% 19 21 40 47.5% 29 32 61 47.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 130/155 of Mirjana Lucic-Baroni's and 1/9 of Sandrine Testud's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Mirjana Lucic-Baroni Sandrine Testud
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
31 2013 9/19 4.1 4.1 56.7% 68.4% 48.1% 53.6% 49.9% 59.4% 41.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 20/20 4.3 5.3 53.7% 68.8% 48.0% 62.8% 45.7% 59.1% 44.5% 2004 1/9 0.0 4.0 64.3% 60.0% 28.0% 61.5% 42.9% 48.6% 41.9%
33 2015 29/43 3.6 6.9 56.7% 63.3% 46.8% 46.1% 48.6% 56.4% 38.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2016 31/32 2.5 6.3 55.5% 65.0% 41.4% 44.4% 54.4% 54.7% 47.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 36/36 3.2 6.6 57.5% 64.6% 41.2% 51.9% 58.5% 54.6% 43.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2018 5/5 1.4 5.2 54.9% 60.4% 37.5% 48.1% 68.9% 50.9% 37.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 130/302 3.3 6.2 56.1% 65.1% 43.9% 50.4% 53.2% 55.9% 43.1% — 1/546 0.0 4.0 64.3% 60.0% 28.0% 61.5% 42.9% 48.6% 41.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mirjana Lucic-Baroni Sandrine Testud
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1997 1676 143.4 — — — — -116 +86 — 67.7% +1.23 4–1 (80%) 3–2 (60%) 105.4 +0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1998 1769 134.7 — — — — -188 +120 — 52.6% +0.37 5–2 (71%) 2–4 (33%) 101.1 +0.58 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1999 1754 132.9 — — — — -144 — -16 45.6% -0.53 5–4 (56%) 4–2 (67%) 107.0 -0.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2000 1599 100.7 — — — — -42 +102 +114 19.4% -2.00 1–2 (33%) 0–3 (0%) 95.6 -0.28 1990 1484 99.3 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.40 0–1 — — -0.16
19 2001 1595 108.4 — — — — — +137 — 36.4% -0.27 1–0 0–1 — -0.02 1991 1550 115.1 — — — — +5 -2 — 47.6% +0.14 4–4 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 100.2 +0.80
20 2002 1545 104.2 — — — — -70 — — 20.0% -2.53 0–1 0–1 — -0.26 1992 1568 120.4 — — — — +2 -13 -14 42.2% -0.63 3–7 (30%) 4–1 (80%) 98.5 +0.18
21 2003 1525 101.6 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.60 0–1 — — -0.09 1993 1561 126.2 — — — — +20 -9 — 39.7% -0.57 3–5 (38%) 2–3 (40%) 98.5 -1.09
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1605 130.9 — — — — +19 -44 — 45.3% -0.40 1–4 (20%) 2–3 (40%) 95.6 +0.24
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1737 138.2 — — — — +1 -140 — 55.1% +0.24 3–5 (38%) 3–4 (43%) 99.9 -0.86
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1774 140.4 — — — — -7 -110 -241 54.7% +0.58 9–5 (64%) 3–2 (60%) 104.9 +1.01
25 2007 1537 109.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.75 — 1–0 — -0.13 1997 1921 159.0 — — — — -23 -105 -290 60.1% +0.67 13–6 (68%) 9–7 (56%) 108.5 -0.03
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1945 158.8 — — — — -9 -36 -184 63.6% +1.08 19–10 (66%) 10–10 (50%) 106.1 +1.78
27 2009 1518 97.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.18 1999 1901 157.5 — — — — +27 -33 -217 56.7% +0.48 8–6 (57%) 9–5 (64%) 103.8 +2.23
28 2010 1554 111.8 — — — — -70 — +160 44.4% -0.52 3–2 (60%) 3–1 (75%) — -0.12 2000 1918 163.3 — — — — +69 -103 -240 56.6% +0.65 13–9 (59%) 7–6 (54%) 102.1 -2.28
29 2011 1551 110.1 — — — — -82 +119 +144 41.2% -0.96 2–5 (29%) 5–2 (71%) 100.3 -0.83 2001 1978 158.2 — — — — +16 -130 -244 62.3% +0.97 14–9 (61%) 10–13 (43%) 100.0 -3.00
30 2012 1535 107.2 — — — — -72 +122 +176 39.1% -1.13 4–4 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 98.2 +0.36 2002 1846 144.7 — — — — +107 +12 -165 52.0% +0.39 8–5 (62%) 3–4 (43%) 99.6 +1.55
31 2013 1562 122.6 +0.65 -0.89 1.023 51.1% -102 +80 +154 47.5% +0.25 1–3 (25%) 0–3 (0%) 95.1 -0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 1707 129.5 +2.54 +0.56 1.087 51.8% -37 -115 — 59.5% +0.71 3–1 (75%) 3–4 (43%) 103.2 -0.45 2004 1726 120.4 -1.08 -0.06 0.815 45.5% +166 +41 — 26.3% -1.58 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — -1.36
33 2015 1634 127.2 -1.64 -2.22 0.875 47.8% -4 -66 +47 43.0% -0.22 7–12 (37%) 2–10 (17%) 93.1 -0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2016 1625 127.9 -1.32 +3.68 1.050 51.1% -46 +79 -10 47.9% +0.14 3–6 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 95.8 -0.85 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 1699 137.2 -0.69 +1.19 0.960 49.5% +14 +54 — 52.4% +0.08 10–6 (63%) 3–5 (38%) 101.6 -0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2018 1690 108.4 -2.20 -1.43 0.772 44.8% +7 — — 40.0% -0.60 2–0 1–0 — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1799 132.5 -0.52 +0.68 0.977 49.8% -54 +70 +84 45.8% -0.27 51–50 (50%) 31–45 (41%) 97.4 -1.09 — 2004 155.8 -1.08 -0.06 0.815 45.5% +17 -60 -202 55.2% +0.45 98–79 (55%) 64–61 (51%) 103.8 -0.18

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.