H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Mirjana Lucic-Baroni vs Silvija Talaja H2H: 0-2
Silvija Talaja holds a 2–0 lead over Mirjana Lucic-Baroni in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Silvija Talaja leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Silvija Talaja won the 2000 Wimbledon second round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 44
Right-Handed
181 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 48
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 29, 2000* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Silvija Talaja | 6-2 6-2 | Mirjana Lucic-Baroni | Match data |
| Jun 9, 1999* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Silvija Talaja | 6-0 5-7 7-5 | Mirjana Lucic-Baroni | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mirjana Lucic-Baroni | #424 | #20 | 1,924 | 1,798 | 136 | 166 | 45.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Silvija Talaja | #1,214 | #18 | 1,376 | 1,811 | 130 | 151 | 46.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mirjana Lucic-Baroni | Silvija Talaja | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1997 | 11–3 | 78.6% | #49 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #288 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1998 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #51 | 1,776 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #251 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1999 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #48 | 1,757 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #280 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2000 | 2–12 | 14.3% | #202 | 1,601 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 9–4 | 69.2% | #106 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2001 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #192 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #199 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2002 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #203 | 1,546 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #85 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #348 | 1,526 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #29 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #29 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #109 | 1,543 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #74 | 1,559 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #455 | 1,538 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #93 | 1,547 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #114 | 1,543 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #258 | 1,519 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #190 | 1,507 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2010 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #96 | 1,554 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2011 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #129 | 1,551 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2012 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #105 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2013 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #110 | 1,563 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2014 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #60 | 1,706 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2015 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #68 | 1,657 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2016 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #80 | 1,629 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2017 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #32 | 1,698 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2018 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #327 | 1,689 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |