H2H data updated: 2026-10-29 00:00 UTC

Mirjana Lucic-Baroni vs Tamarine Tanasugarn H2H: 1-0

Mirjana Lucic-Baroni holds a 1–0 lead over Tamarine Tanasugarn in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mirjana Lucic-Baroni leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Mirjana Lucic-Baroni won the 1999 Wimbledon round of 16 7-5 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mirjana Lucic-Baroni
CRO Age 44 Right-Handed 181 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Tamarine Tanasugarn
THA Age 49 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mirjana Lucic-Baroni #134 7-5 6-3 Tamarine Tanasugarn #63 Match data Jun 30, 1999* R16 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mirjana Lucic-Baroni — #20 1,924 1,798 136 166 45.0% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Tamarine Tanasugarn — #19 1,508 1,825 268 276 49.3% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mirjana Lucic-Baroni Tamarine Tanasugarn
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1997 11–3 78.6% #49 1,676 0 1 — — — — — — —
16 1998 15–11 57.7% #51 1,768 0 2 1993 0–1 0.0% #407 1,483 0 0
17 1999 11–13 45.8% #48 1,753 0 2 1994 1–1 50.0% #227 1,493 0 0
18 2000 2–12 14.3% #202 1,599 0 2 1995 2–5 28.6% #213 1,479 0 0
19 2001 2–3 40.0% #192 1,595 0 2 1996 9–5 64.3% #75 1,610 0 0
20 2002 1–6 14.3% #203 1,545 0 2 1997 18–20 47.4% #47 1,648 0 0
21 2003 0–2 0.0% #348 1,524 0 2 1998 20–21 48.8% #37 1,701 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 1999 8–13 38.1% #71 1,633 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 2000 31–19 62.0% #28 1,792 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 2001 24–21 53.3% #29 1,698 0 0
25 2007 1–1 50.0% #455 1,537 0 2 2002 32–26 55.2% #28 1,676 0 0
26 — — — — — — — 2003 28–23 54.9% #34 1,694 0 1
27 2009 0–1 0.0% #258 1,518 0 2 2004 19–25 43.2% #66 1,609 0 1
28 2010 5–6 45.5% #96 1,554 0 2 2005 7–16 30.4% #122 1,496 0 1
29 2011 8–14 36.4% #129 1,551 0 2 2006 9–7 56.2% #72 1,584 0 1
30 2012 7–12 36.8% #105 1,535 0 2 2007 9–18 33.3% #117 1,568 0 1
31 2013 8–11 42.1% #110 1,562 0 2 2008 19–16 54.3% #37 1,684 0 2
32 2014 12–8 60.0% #60 1,706 0 3 2009 10–12 45.5% #101 1,646 0 3
33 2015 17–26 39.5% #68 1,634 0 3 2010 14–9 60.9% #62 1,732 0 4
34 2016 14–18 43.8% #80 1,625 0 3 2011 4–10 28.6% #94 1,648 0 4
35 2017 20–16 55.6% #32 1,699 0 3 2012 4–7 36.4% #152 1,595 0 4
36 2018 2–3 40.0% #327 1,690 0 3 — — — — — — —
38 — — — — — — — 2015 0–1 0.0% #855 1,577 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mirjana Lucic-Baroni Tamarine Tanasugarn
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1997 2 1 3 66.7% 9 1 10 90.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1998 4 7 11 36.4% 10 2 12 83.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1993 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1999 5 8 13 38.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 1994 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2000 1 6 7 14.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1995 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 1996 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
20 2002 0 5 5 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1997 12 11 23 52.2% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 2003 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 15 12 27 55.6% 1 5 6 16.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 3 8 11 27.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 19 12 31 61.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 18 15 33 54.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
25 2007 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 24 16 40 60.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 21 16 37 56.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 1 3 66.7%
27 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 13 18 31 41.9% 0 4 4 0.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2010 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2005 3 10 13 23.1% 0 4 4 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
29 2011 2 6 8 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2006 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
30 2012 3 6 9 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2007 7 12 19 36.8% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 2013 2 5 7 28.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2008 8 12 20 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 11 2 13 84.6% — — — —
32 2014 11 4 15 73.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2009 3 7 10 30.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
33 2015 12 18 30 40.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2010 12 5 17 70.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
34 2016 5 11 16 31.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2011 3 9 12 25.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
35 2017 14 9 23 60.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2012 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
36 2018 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 66 98 164 40.2% 49 42 91 53.8% 21 24 45 46.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — 183 185 368 49.7% 12 47 59 20.3% 67 37 104 64.4% 6 7 13 46.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 130/155 of Mirjana Lucic-Baroni's and 141/267 of Tamarine Tanasugarn's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Mirjana Lucic-Baroni Tamarine Tanasugarn
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 6/51 2.0 3.0 58.2% 61.2% 49.7% 35.8% 37.7% 56.3% 42.0%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 4/44 2.0 4.5 59.8% 53.6% 36.4% 48.4% 51.3% 46.9% 39.9%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 9/23 1.8 3.6 58.3% 59.8% 45.3% 40.8% 52.1% 53.8% 48.0%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 3/16 1.7 2.3 62.1% 59.8% 46.6% 49.0% 41.0% 55.0% 41.7%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 21/27 1.4 4.0 59.8% 57.8% 40.3% 47.2% 47.0% 50.7% 40.6%
31 2013 9/19 4.1 4.1 56.7% 68.4% 48.1% 53.6% 49.9% 59.4% 41.5% 2008 30/35 1.1 2.9 62.5% 63.1% 46.1% 61.7% 50.8% 56.7% 42.7%
32 2014 20/20 4.3 5.3 53.7% 68.8% 48.0% 62.8% 45.7% 59.1% 44.5% 2009 20/22 0.8 3.4 65.8% 60.5% 46.3% 57.5% 47.3% 55.3% 42.6%
33 2015 29/43 3.6 6.9 56.7% 63.3% 46.8% 46.1% 48.6% 56.4% 38.2% 2010 22/23 1.0 3.1 68.1% 58.7% 51.5% 55.0% 56.2% 56.1% 48.3%
34 2016 31/32 2.5 6.3 55.5% 65.0% 41.4% 44.4% 54.4% 54.7% 47.6% 2011 14/14 0.7 3.4 63.9% 56.7% 43.6% 34.9% 42.6% 51.9% 40.0%
35 2017 36/36 3.2 6.6 57.5% 64.6% 41.2% 51.9% 58.5% 54.6% 43.6% 2012 11/11 1.0 3.5 64.1% 52.1% 45.1% 43.9% 58.9% 49.2% 41.3%
36 2018 5/5 1.4 5.2 54.9% 60.4% 37.5% 48.1% 68.9% 50.9% 37.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 1/1 0.0 4.0 67.2% 51.3% 36.8% 50.0% 50.0% 46.6% 30.9%
Career — 130/302 3.3 6.2 56.1% 65.1% 43.9% 50.4% 52.9% 55.9% 43.1% — 141/544 1.1 3.3 63.2% 59.0% 45.5% 50.8% 49.7% 53.9% 43.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mirjana Lucic-Baroni Tamarine Tanasugarn
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1997 1676 143.4 — — — — -116 +86 — 67.7% +1.23 4–1 (80%) 3–2 (60%) 105.4 +0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1998 1769 134.7 — — — — -188 +121 — 52.6% +0.37 5–2 (71%) 2–4 (33%) 101.1 +0.60 1993 1483 96.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — +0.17
17 1999 1754 132.9 — — — — -144 — -16 45.6% -0.53 5–4 (56%) 4–2 (67%) 107.0 -0.61 1994 1493 103.5 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.83 1–1 — — +0.06
18 2000 1599 100.7 — — — — -42 +102 +114 19.4% -2.00 1–2 (33%) 0–3 (0%) 95.6 -0.28 1995 1479 101.4 — — — — +23 — — 29.4% -1.53 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 100.8 +0.28
19 2001 1595 108.4 — — — — — +137 — 36.4% -0.27 1–0 0–1 — -0.02 1996 1610 124.2 — — — — +2 — — 64.3% +1.21 0–2 1–3 (25%) — +0.66
20 2002 1545 104.2 — — — — -70 — — 20.0% -2.53 0–1 0–1 — -0.26 1997 1648 125.5 — — — — -4 -102 +9 48.3% -0.34 5–6 (45%) 3–2 (60%) 100.9 +1.65
21 2003 1525 101.6 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.60 0–1 — — -0.09 1998 1702 138.7 — — — — +13 -199 +20 48.9% -0.10 5–5 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 99.1 +1.91
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1634 113.0 — — — — -11 -164 +111 40.8% -0.57 3–4 (43%) 3–2 (60%) 99.4 +0.52
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1792 139.5 — — — — -52 -296 +110 59.5% +0.54 7–4 (64%) 6–7 (46%) 102.9 -1.29
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1698 135.6 — — — — +14 -272 +291 51.5% +0.09 8–9 (47%) 7–6 (54%) 97.5 +2.28
25 2007 1538 109.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.75 — 1–0 — -0.12 2002 1677 130.8 — — — — +37 -232 +254 52.5% +0.01 15–10 (60%) 7–6 (54%) 101.9 +2.48
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1695 137.1 +0.58 -0.37 0.961 48.9% +45 -272 +201 54.7% +0.32 7–8 (47%) 5–6 (45%) 97.4 +0.78
27 2009 1518 97.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.18 2004 1610 121.0 -2.76 -1.27 0.751 43.8% -13 -221 +320 45.7% -0.05 2–8 (20%) 3–4 (43%) 92.4 +1.55
28 2010 1555 111.8 — — — — -71 — +159 44.4% -0.52 3–2 (60%) 3–1 (75%) — -0.11 2005 1497 98.5 -0.83 +0.77 1.037 50.9% -9 -166 +399 30.6% -1.35 2–1 (67%) 0–2 — +0.91
29 2011 1552 110.2 — — — — -83 +118 +143 41.2% -0.96 2–5 (29%) 5–2 (71%) 100.3 -0.83 2006 1585 113.8 -0.78 -1.37 0.927 47.9% -33 — +318 52.8% +0.56 3–3 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 98.4 +0.99
30 2012 1535 107.2 — — — — -72 +123 +177 39.1% -1.13 4–4 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 98.2 +0.36 2007 1569 117.5 -2.84 -1.65 0.822 45.7% -1 -211 — 29.8% -1.54 4–3 (57%) 2–1 (67%) 103.0 -1.96
31 2013 1562 122.6 +0.65 -0.89 1.023 51.1% -102 +80 +154 47.5% +0.25 1–3 (25%) 0–3 (0%) 95.1 -0.31 2008 1685 130.6 +1.07 -0.63 0.987 49.9% -104 — +348 53.2% -0.05 5–4 (56%) 5–1 (83%) 104.5 -1.04
32 2014 1707 129.5 +2.54 +0.56 1.087 51.8% -37 -114 — 59.5% +0.71 3–1 (75%) 3–4 (43%) 103.2 -0.45 2009 1646 112.2 -0.30 -0.53 0.953 49.0% -110 -287 +344 46.9% -0.18 2–3 (40%) 2–1 (67%) 99.3 -0.12
33 2015 1634 127.2 -1.64 -2.22 0.875 47.8% -4 -66 +47 43.0% -0.22 7–12 (37%) 2–10 (17%) 93.1 -0.40 2010 1733 129.8 +0.24 +3.07 1.101 52.2% -27 — +171 55.8% +0.65 5–1 (83%) 2–2 (50%) 104.9 -0.50
34 2016 1625 127.9 -1.32 +3.68 1.050 51.1% -45 +80 -9 47.9% +0.14 3–6 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 95.8 -0.85 2011 1649 112.2 -1.46 -2.12 0.832 45.7% -17 — — 28.6% -1.57 — — — -0.69
35 2017 1699 137.2 -0.69 +1.19 0.960 49.5% +14 +54 — 52.4% +0.08 10–6 (63%) 3–5 (38%) 101.6 -0.19 2012 1595 100.2 -3.00 -1.41 0.812 45.8% +29 — — 31.8% -1.59 1–1 1–1 — -0.01
36 2018 1690 108.4 -2.20 -1.43 0.772 44.8% +8 — — 40.0% -0.60 2–0 1–0 — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1578 97.4 -0.66 -2.32 0.578 38.9% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — +0.05
Career — 1799 132.5 -0.52 +0.68 0.977 49.8% -54 +70 +84 45.8% -0.27 51–50 (50%) 31–45 (41%) 97.4 -1.08 — 1825 132.1 -0.71 -0.34 0.932 48.5% -6 -214 +226 48.6% -0.13 77–74 (51%) 52–55 (49%) 98.6 +1.60

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.