H2H data updated: 2026-11-07 00:00 UTC

Mirjana Lucic-Baroni vs Tamira Paszek H2H: 1-0

Mirjana Lucic-Baroni holds a 1–0 lead over Tamira Paszek in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mirjana Lucic-Baroni leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mirjana Lucic-Baroni won the 2015 Quebec City round of 16 6-3 6-3.

CRO Age 44 Right-Handed 181 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Austria Age 35 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mirjana Lucic-Baroni #104 6-3 6-3 Tamira Paszek Match data Sep 18, 2015* R16 Quebec City International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mirjana Lucic-Baroni — #20 1,924 1,798 136 166 45.0% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Tamira Paszek — #366 169 1,783 100 130 43.5% 0 0 0 1 2 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mirjana Lucic-Baroni Tamira Paszek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 2005 1–1 50.0% — 1,512 0 0
15 1997 11–3 78.6% #49 1,676 0 1 2006 6–2 75.0% — 1,599 0 1
16 1998 15–11 57.7% #51 1,768 0 2 2007 15–14 51.7% — 1,730 0 1
17 1999 11–13 45.8% #48 1,753 0 2 2008 16–18 47.1% — 1,697 0 1
18 2000 2–12 14.3% #202 1,599 0 2 2009 5–9 35.7% — 1,626 0 1
19 2001 2–3 40.0% #192 1,595 0 2 2010 9–9 50.0% — 1,642 0 2
20 2002 1–6 14.3% #203 1,545 0 2 2011 19–21 47.5% — 1,654 0 2
21 2003 0–2 0.0% #348 1,524 0 2 2012 18–21 46.2% — 1,676 0 3
22 — — — — — — — 2013 2–17 10.5% — 1,476 0 3
23 — — — — — — — 2014 1–4 20.0% — 1,469 0 3
24 — — — — — — — 2015 1–4 20.0% — 1,442 0 3
25 2007 1–1 50.0% #455 1,537 0 2 2016 7–10 41.2% — 1,530 0 3
27 2009 0–1 0.0% #258 1,518 0 2 — — — — — — —
28 2010 5–6 45.5% #96 1,554 0 2 — — — — — — —
29 2011 8–14 36.4% #129 1,551 0 2 — — — — — — —
30 2012 7–12 36.8% #105 1,535 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 2013 8–11 42.1% #110 1,562 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2014 12–8 60.0% #60 1,706 0 3 — — — — — — —
33 2015 17–26 39.5% #68 1,634 0 3 — — — — — — —
34 2016 14–18 43.8% #80 1,625 0 3 — — — — — — —
35 2017 20–16 55.6% #32 1,699 0 3 — — — — — — —
36 2018 2–3 40.0% #327 1,690 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mirjana Lucic-Baroni Tamira Paszek
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1997 2 1 3 66.7% 9 1 10 90.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2006 5 1 6 83.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
16 1998 4 7 11 36.4% 10 2 12 83.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2007 8 8 16 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
17 1999 5 8 13 38.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2008 16 13 29 55.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
18 2000 1 6 7 14.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2009 2 5 7 28.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 2001 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 2010 9 6 15 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2002 0 5 5 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2011 12 13 25 48.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
21 2003 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 8 14 22 36.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 9 3 12 75.0% — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 2 9 11 18.2% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2007 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 4 6 10 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
27 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2010 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2011 2 6 8 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2012 3 6 9 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 2 5 7 28.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 11 4 15 73.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2015 12 18 30 40.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2016 5 11 16 31.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 14 9 23 60.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2018 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 66 98 164 40.2% 49 42 91 53.8% 21 24 45 46.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — 68 79 147 46.3% 9 29 38 23.7% 23 20 43 53.5% 0 2 2 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mirjana Lucic-Baroni Tamira Paszek
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1512 102.6 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.80 1–0 1–0 — +0.21
15 1997 1676 143.4 — — — — -116 +86 — 67.7% +1.23 4–1 (80%) 3–2 (60%) 105.4 +0.12 2006 1599 117.1 -2.20 -1.38 0.844 45.8% +6 — — 66.7% +1.17 2–2 (50%) — — +0.29
16 1998 1769 134.7 — — — — -188 +121 — 52.6% +0.37 5–2 (71%) 2–4 (33%) 101.1 +0.60 2007 1730 133.2 -1.27 +0.75 0.913 47.9% -49 -178 +8 50.7% -0.37 5–4 (56%) 4–2 (67%) 104.0 -1.40
17 1999 1754 132.9 — — — — -144 — -16 45.6% -0.53 5–4 (56%) 4–2 (67%) 107.0 -0.61 2008 1697 128.9 -3.26 +1.42 0.909 47.8% +12 -213 — 47.4% -0.25 8–4 (67%) 3–0 (100%) 108.1 -1.56
18 2000 1599 100.7 — — — — -42 +102 +114 19.4% -2.00 1–2 (33%) 0–3 (0%) 95.6 -0.28 2009 1626 108.4 -2.23 +0.93 0.929 48.2% +25 -113 — 43.8% -0.53 2–4 (33%) 0–2 — -0.03
19 2001 1595 108.4 — — — — — +137 — 36.4% -0.27 1–0 0–1 — -0.02 2010 1643 119.0 -0.31 +0.77 1.096 52.0% +37 — — 52.4% +0.21 2–4 (33%) 2–4 (33%) 97.8 +1.13
20 2002 1545 104.2 — — — — -70 — — 20.0% -2.53 0–1 0–1 — -0.26 2011 1654 118.4 -0.83 -1.22 0.934 48.7% -29 -208 +85 44.9% -0.32 11–4 (73%) 5–5 (50%) 105.7 +0.40
21 2003 1525 101.6 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.60 0–1 — — -0.09 2012 1677 126.3 -1.34 -0.35 0.926 48.5% -92 -243 +188 45.0% -0.36 8–2 (80%) 5–7 (42%) 105.1 -1.21
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1476 92.5 -4.43 -3.94 0.718 42.8% +20 -113 +289 13.9% -2.69 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) 96.6 +1.10
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1469 105.3 -0.61 -1.02 0.882 47.8% — — — 38.5% -1.00 0–3 (0%) 2–0 — -0.22
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1443 101.3 -2.43 -3.45 0.659 42.2% +33 — — 27.3% -1.27 0–1 1–1 — +0.30
25 2007 1538 109.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.75 — 1–0 — -0.12 2016 1531 113.8 -3.82 +0.69 0.885 47.2% -40 — +186 34.4% -1.12 3–1 (75%) 1–1 — -0.03
27 2009 1518 97.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2010 1555 111.8 — — — — -71 — +159 44.4% -0.52 3–2 (60%) 3–1 (75%) — -0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2011 1552 110.2 — — — — -83 +118 +143 41.2% -0.96 2–5 (29%) 5–2 (71%) 100.3 -0.83 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2012 1535 107.2 — — — — -72 +123 +177 39.1% -1.13 4–4 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 98.2 +0.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 1562 122.6 +0.65 -0.89 1.023 51.1% -102 +80 +154 47.5% +0.25 1–3 (25%) 0–3 (0%) 95.1 -0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 1707 129.5 +2.54 +0.56 1.087 51.8% -37 -114 — 59.5% +0.71 3–1 (75%) 3–4 (43%) 103.2 -0.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2015 1634 127.2 -1.64 -2.22 0.875 47.8% -4 -66 +47 43.0% -0.22 7–12 (37%) 2–10 (17%) 93.1 -0.40 2024 1511 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2016 1625 128.9 -1.32 +3.68 1.050 51.1% -45 +80 -9 47.9% +0.14 3–6 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 95.8 -0.85 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 1699 137.2 -0.69 +1.19 0.960 49.5% +14 +54 — 52.4% +0.08 10–6 (63%) 3–5 (38%) 101.6 -0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2018 1690 108.4 -2.20 -1.43 0.772 44.8% +8 — — 40.0% -0.60 2–0 1–0 — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1799 132.7 -0.52 +0.68 0.977 49.8% -54 +70 +84 45.8% -0.27 51–50 (50%) 31–45 (41%) 97.4 -1.08 — 1783 124.8 -1.95 -0.16 0.910 48.0% -17 -177 +137 43.9% -0.51 43–32 (57%) 25–24 (51%) 108.2 -0.45

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.