H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Molly Van Nostrand vs Grace Kim H2H: 1-1

Molly Van Nostrand and Grace Kim are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Grace Kim leads 1–0 on carpet, while Molly Van Nostrand leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Molly Van Nostrand won the 1986 US Open round of 128 4-6 7-6(5) 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Molly Van Nostrand
USA Age 61
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Grace Kim
USA Age 58

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Molly Van Nostrand 4-6 7-6(5) 6-4 Grace Kim Match data Aug 28, 1986* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Grace Kim 6-3 6-2 Molly Van Nostrand Match data Dec 12, 1985* R32 Tokyo Pan Pacific WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Molly Van Nostrand — — — 1,684 36 67 35.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grace Kim — — — 1,705 47 82 36.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Molly Van Nostrand Grace Kim
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1982 7–3 70.0% — 1,585 0 1
15 — — — — — — — 1983 2–4 33.3% — 1,591 0 1
16 1981 0–1 0.0% — 1,486 0 0 1984 6–10 37.5% — 1,622 0 1
17 — — — — — — — 1985 17–25 40.5% — 1,694 0 1
18 1983 3–2 60.0% — 1,516 0 0 1986 10–22 31.2% — 1,605 0 1
19 1984 6–8 42.9% — 1,532 0 0 1987 5–13 27.8% — 1,515 0 1
20 1985 9–11 45.0% — 1,625 0 0 1988 0–5 0.0% — 1,469 0 1
21 1986 7–14 33.3% — 1,631 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1987 5–14 26.3% — 1,534 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 1988 1–5 16.7% — 1,509 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 1989 5–12 29.4% — 1,504 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Molly Van Nostrand Grace Kim
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 6 1 7 85.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
16 1981 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1984 4 4 8 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 11 12 23 47.8% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
18 1983 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 11 16 31.3%
19 1984 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1987 1 7 8 12.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0%
20 1985 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 5 4 9 55.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 1988 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1986 6 3 9 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1987 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1988 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1989 2 8 10 20.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 24 32 56 42.9% 0 5 5 0.0% 6 15 21 28.6% 6 15 21 28.6% — 28 35 63 44.4% 4 18 22 18.2% 3 10 13 23.1% 11 18 29 37.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Molly Van Nostrand Grace Kim
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1586 114.0 — — — — +73 — — 66.7% +1.10 3–0 (100%) 1–2 (33%) 103.8 +1.42
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1592 115.9 — — — — +65 — — 30.8% -1.00 1–0 — — -0.06
16 1981 1486 96.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — +0.26 1984 1622 113.8 — — — — +26 — +18 36.6% -1.49 6–3 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 103.7 -0.48
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1694 125.2 — — — — +52 -205 -135 43.4% -0.79 6–9 (40%) 6–2 (75%) 101.5 -0.64
18 1983 1517 107.4 — — — — +83 — — 58.3% +0.83 1–1 — — +0.77 1986 1605 117.7 — — — — +47 -126 — 33.3% -1.54 2–3 (40%) 2–2 (50%) 99.0 +0.32
19 1984 1532 103.9 — — — — +82 — — 43.8% -0.28 2–2 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 99.0 +1.55 1987 1515 97.7 — — — — +45 — -17 32.6% -1.47 3–4 (43%) 1–1 — +2.17
20 1985 1625 138.4 — — — — +13 — +13 46.7% -0.60 2–3 (40%) 2–2 (50%) 99.9 -0.37 1988 1469 96.4 — — — — — -61 — 0.0% -3.90 — 0–1 — -0.26
21 1986 1632 119.0 — — — — +27 — -54 31.9% -1.36 4–5 (44%) 1–4 (20%) 99.6 -1.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1987 1535 102.5 — — — — +56 — -1 30.0% -1.57 0–2 0–2 — +0.95 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1988 1510 101.9 — — — — +11 — — 28.6% -1.86 0–2 1–0 — -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1989 1504 111.7 — — — — +8 — — 34.1% -1.19 3–4 (43%) 0–2 — -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1685 119.3 — — — — +36 — -3 37.3% -1.00 12–19 (39%) 5–14 (26%) 93.7 +1.97 — 1705 119.1 — — — — +49 -161 -47 38.2% -1.14 21–19 (53%) 11–10 (52%) 103.5 +1.93

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.