H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Mona Barthel vs Aleksandra Krunic H2H: 0-2
Aleksandra Krunic holds a 2–0 lead over Mona Barthel in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Aleksandra Krunic leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Aleksandra Krunic won the 2017 Guangzhou fourth round 6-4 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 36
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
SRB
Age 33
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2017* | Guangzhou | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Aleksandra Krunic | 6-4 6-0 | Mona Barthel | Match data |
| Oct 16, 2015* | Linz | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Aleksandra Krunic | 7-6(6) 6-3 | Mona Barthel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mona Barthel | #223 | #23 | 1,762 | 1,841 | 151 | 179 | 45.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Aleksandra Krunic | #470 | #39 | 1,210 | 1,771 | 86 | 117 | 42.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mona Barthel | Aleksandra Krunic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #223 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #195 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #165 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2011 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #69 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #151 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2012 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #39 | 1,682 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #87 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2013 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #34 | 1,646 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #108 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2014 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,712 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #144 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2015 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #45 | 1,672 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #54 | 1,752 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2016 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #158 | 1,555 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #55 | 1,728 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2017 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #48 | 1,600 | 0 | 4 | 2019 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #163 | 1,561 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2018 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #77 | 1,625 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2019 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #183 | 1,552 | 0 | 4 | 2021 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #128 | 1,645 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #115 | 1,636 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2021 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #275 | 1,458 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #286 | 1,605 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #468 | 1,567 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #171 | 1,525 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #223 | 1,535 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |