H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Mona Barthel vs Annika Beck H2H: 1-2
Annika Beck holds a 2–1 lead over Mona Barthel in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Annika Beck leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Mona Barthel leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mona Barthel won the 2014 Nuremberg fourth round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 36
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
GER
Age 32
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2014* | Nuremberg | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Mona Barthel | 6-2 6-4 | Annika Beck | Match data |
| Apr 10, 2014* | Katowice | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Annika Beck | 6-1 6-4 | Mona Barthel | Match data |
| Feb 12, 2014* | Doha | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Annika Beck | 7-6(5) 6-2 | Mona Barthel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mona Barthel | #223 | #23 | 1,762 | 1,841 | 151 | 179 | 45.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Annika Beck | #903 | #37 | 1,455 | 1,746 | 91 | 114 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mona Barthel | Annika Beck | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #78 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #195 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #58 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2011 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #69 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #53 | 1,664 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2012 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #39 | 1,682 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,650 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2013 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #34 | 1,646 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #51 | 1,670 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2014 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,712 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #178 | 1,510 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2015 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #45 | 1,672 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2016 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #158 | 1,555 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2017 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #48 | 1,600 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2018 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #77 | 1,625 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2019 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #183 | 1,552 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2021 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #275 | 1,458 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #171 | 1,525 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #223 | 1,535 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |