H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 22:32 UTC
Mona Barthel vs Carina Witthoeft H2H: 2-1
Mona Barthel holds a 2–1 lead over Carina Witthoeft in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Mona Barthel leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mona Barthel won the 2018 Nurnberg third round 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 36
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
GER
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2018* | Nurnberg | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Mona Barthel | 7-5 6-3 | Carina Witthoeft | Match data |
| Oct 19, 2016* | Luxembourg | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Mona Barthel | 6-1 6-4 | Carina Witthoeft | Match data |
| Apr 23, 2015* | Stuttgart | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Carina Witthoeft | 7-5 6-3 | Mona Barthel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mona Barthel | #223 | #23 | 1,762 | 1,841 | 151 | 179 | 45.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Carina Witthoeft | #1,212 | #48 | 1,093 | 1,745 | 49 | 69 | 41.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Mona Barthel | Carina Witthoeft | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #195 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #225 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #69 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #210 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #39 | 1,682 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #105 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #34 | 1,646 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #64 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,712 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #88 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #45 | 1,672 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #51 | 1,745 | 0 | 1 |
| 2016 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #158 | 1,555 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 5–18 | 21.7% | #170 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 |
| 2017 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #48 | 1,600 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #77 | 1,625 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #183 | 1,552 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #275 | 1,458 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #171 | 1,525 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #223 | 1,535 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |