H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Mona Barthel vs Irina Falconi Hartman H2H: 0-1
Irina Falconi Hartman holds a 1–0 lead over Mona Barthel in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Irina Falconi Hartman leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Irina Falconi Hartman won the 2016 Roland Garros first round 6-4 0-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 36
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2016* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Irina Falconi Hartman | 6-4 0-6 6-2 | Mona Barthel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mona Barthel | #223 | #23 | 1,762 | 1,841 | 151 | 179 | 45.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Irina Falconi Hartman | #1,008 | #63 | 1,005 | 1,614 | 42 | 72 | 36.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Mona Barthel | Irina Falconi Hartman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #195 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #69 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #84 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #39 | 1,682 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #151 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #34 | 1,646 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #144 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,712 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #112 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #45 | 1,672 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #76 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #158 | 1,555 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #99 | 1,560 | 0 | 1 |
| 2017 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #48 | 1,600 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #129 | 1,497 | 0 | 1 |
| 2018 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #77 | 1,625 | 0 | 4 | 2018 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #271 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 |
| 2019 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #183 | 1,552 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #275 | 1,458 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #171 | 1,525 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #223 | 1,535 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |