H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Mona Barthel vs Jill Craybas H2H: 1-0

Mona Barthel holds a 1–0 lead over Jill Craybas in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mona Barthel leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mona Barthel won the 2012 Indian Wells Open round of 128 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mona Barthel
Germany Age 36 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Jill Craybas
USA Age 52 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mona Barthel #37 6-1 6-2 Jill Craybas #142 Match data Mar 9, 2012* R128 Indian Wells Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mona Barthel #205 #23 1,762 1,840 151 182 45.3% 0 0 0 1 3 4
Jill Craybas #336 #39 974 1,693 161 257 38.5% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mona Barthel Jill Craybas
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2010 0–1 0.0% #195 1,493 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2011 5–6 45.5% #69 1,552 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2012 29–24 54.7% #39 1,682 0 1 1996 0–1 0.0% — 1,488 0 0
22 2013 24–22 52.2% #34 1,646 0 2 — — — — — — —
23 2014 23–23 50.0% #42 1,713 0 3 1998 0–1 0.0% #154 1,473 0 0
24 2015 24–26 48.0% #45 1,670 0 3 1999 0–4 0.0% #175 1,445 0 0
25 2016 6–13 31.6% #158 1,560 0 3 2000 1–2 33.3% #145 1,449 0 0
26 2017 17–18 48.6% #48 1,602 0 4 2001 8–17 32.0% #98 1,479 0 0
27 2018 14–20 41.2% #77 1,625 0 4 2002 19–15 55.9% #57 1,652 0 1
28 2019 6–13 31.6% #183 1,549 0 4 2003 16–22 42.1% #99 1,568 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 2004 12–21 36.4% #59 1,496 0 1
30 2021 3–12 20.0% #275 1,457 0 4 2005 19–23 45.2% #48 1,612 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 2006 18–25 41.9% #70 1,567 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 2007 12–27 30.8% #79 1,472 0 1
33 2024 0–2 0.0% #171 1,525 0 4 2008 22–26 45.8% #64 1,571 0 1
34 — — — — — — — 2009 12–21 36.4% #76 1,590 0 1
35 2026 0–2 0.0% #205 1,556 0 4 2010 12–23 34.3% #98 1,546 0 1
36 — — — — — — — 2011 6–20 23.1% #150 1,442 0 1
37 — — — — — — — 2012 3–7 30.0% #189 1,448 0 1
38 — — — — — — — 2013 1–2 33.3% #336 1,451 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mona Barthel Jill Craybas
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2011 4 2 6 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2012 21 14 35 60.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1996 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2013 16 14 30 53.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 0 5 100.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2014 11 14 25 44.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1998 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2015 18 16 34 52.9% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1999 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2016 4 8 12 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2000 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2017 6 9 15 40.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 2001 5 8 13 38.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2018 8 12 20 40.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2002 12 8 20 60.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
28 2019 5 5 10 50.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2003 11 14 25 44.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 10 14 24 41.7% 0 5 5 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
30 2021 3 8 11 27.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2005 10 15 25 40.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 1 4 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 13 15 28 46.4% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 9 17 26 34.6% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
33 2024 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2008 14 15 29 48.3% 8 9 17 47.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 9 12 21 42.9% 2 8 10 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
35 2026 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2010 6 13 19 31.6% 5 8 13 38.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 3 11 14 21.4% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1 2 3 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 96 104 200 48.0% 38 51 89 42.7% 10 25 35 28.6% 7 2 9 77.8% — 104 152 256 40.6% 44 77 121 36.4% 12 22 34 35.3% 1 6 7 14.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 309/334 of Mona Barthel's and 212/350 of Jill Craybas's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Mona Barthel Jill Craybas
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 2010 1/1 6.0 2.0 64.3% 66.7% 52.0% 60.0% 0.0% 61.4% 31.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2011 11/11 2.1 4.2 61.8% 63.6% 38.0% 50.5% 45.8% 53.6% 43.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2012 50/53 4.2 5.7 53.8% 70.4% 46.7% 53.9% 50.1% 59.2% 46.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2013 46/46 3.3 3.4 61.5% 66.4% 45.6% 56.9% 46.0% 58.5% 43.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2014 43/46 2.5 4.0 61.4% 64.9% 45.0% 55.3% 46.4% 57.1% 43.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2015 35/50 3.5 3.7 59.3% 64.0% 49.5% 47.1% 42.6% 58.1% 41.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2016 18/20 3.8 5.6 55.2% 66.7% 43.9% 50.0% 46.3% 56.8% 39.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2017 34/35 4.1 5.1 61.2% 65.8% 43.6% 53.5% 46.5% 56.9% 42.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2018 34/34 5.0 6.3 57.7% 66.0% 43.3% 56.9% 45.8% 56.3% 39.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2019 19/19 4.1 6.3 57.6% 67.5% 41.5% 48.3% 42.4% 56.3% 38.3% 2003 3/38 0.3 3.0 64.3% 52.0% 37.3% 34.9% 52.8% 47.1% 35.2%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 6/33 0.2 2.2 63.7% 60.8% 46.8% 53.4% 42.0% 55.7% 45.5%
30 2021 14/15 5.4 6.3 53.6% 68.6% 42.3% 49.5% 37.8% 56.5% 37.1% 2005 7/42 0.6 3.1 66.5% 54.8% 41.1% 49.7% 52.7% 50.1% 46.6%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 24/43 1.1 3.0 63.8% 58.5% 43.9% 52.8% 54.0% 53.3% 45.2%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 29/39 1.1 2.6 62.4% 54.5% 45.8% 48.4% 50.3% 51.3% 42.8%
33 2024 2/2 2.5 10.0 51.7% 54.0% 44.0% 14.3% 32.5% 49.3% 42.7% 2008 40/48 0.8 3.3 66.3% 58.5% 43.8% 50.7% 47.2% 53.7% 46.8%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 31/33 0.5 3.7 62.0% 58.5% 41.9% 45.7% 48.8% 52.3% 43.6%
35 2026 2/2 1.0 7.5 59.7% 62.5% 38.1% 53.3% 30.6% 52.6% 43.5% 2010 34/35 1.1 2.9 64.2% 58.1% 40.4% 43.9% 50.1% 52.0% 41.2%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 25/26 0.7 2.8 62.7% 56.2% 40.4% 52.8% 38.8% 50.4% 38.8%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 10/10 0.5 3.1 65.4% 54.2% 35.3% 44.1% 56.6% 47.6% 41.2%
38 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 3/3 0.7 3.3 63.5% 49.9% 34.0% 44.0% 42.9% 44.5% 41.0%
Career — 309/334 3.8 4.9 58.5% 66.4% 44.9% 52.9% 45.4% 57.4% 42.2% — 212/418 0.8 3.1 63.9% 57.2% 42.2% 48.5% 48.6% 51.9% 43.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mona Barthel Jill Craybas
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 2010 1493 100.8 +1.29 +0.85 0.810 47.0% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2011 1552 119.1 -0.55 -0.55 0.929 48.7% +28 -19 — 45.8% -0.46 1–1 1–3 (25%) — -0.58 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2012 1682 144.4 +3.00 +2.35 1.139 52.8% +34 -50 -166 57.8% +0.69 3–11 (21%) 10–12 (45%) 92.9 -2.53 1996 1488 98.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.11
22 2013 1646 138.9 +2.09 +0.25 1.053 51.1% +80 -90 -184 53.4% +0.41 6–7 (46%) 6–7 (46%) 97.5 -0.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2014 1713 124.3 +1.01 -0.81 1.002 50.2% -62 -24 -158 50.5% -0.09 5–6 (45%) 6–4 (60%) 101.5 -0.80 1998 1473 98.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.19
24 2015 1671 128.2 -0.49 -0.40 0.986 49.6% +10 -45 — 51.7% +0.24 10–14 (42%) 10–10 (50%) 96.5 +2.15 1999 1445 107.1 — — — — +24 — — 0.0% -2.75 — 0–2 — -0.12
25 2016 1561 109.3 +0.53 -2.53 0.913 48.2% +29 +35 -55 37.8% -0.73 1–4 (20%) 2–1 (67%) 96.5 -0.82 2000 1450 103.4 — — — — +23 — — 42.9% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.02
26 2017 1602 121.9 +0.49 -0.40 0.977 49.6% -11 +63 -97 48.8% -0.34 6–8 (43%) 6–2 (75%) 100.9 -0.52 2001 1479 110.7 — — — — +12 -6 — 36.2% -0.76 3–5 (38%) 1–4 (20%) 95.6 +0.19
27 2018 1625 120.7 -0.13 -2.87 0.910 48.2% +7 -36 -60 42.2% -0.52 8–7 (53%) 3–4 (43%) 102.3 -0.60 2002 1653 112.4 — — — — -22 -155 -43 47.4% -0.45 10–4 (71%) 3–1 (75%) 110.1 +0.70
28 2019 1550 122.1 -0.64 -2.56 0.876 47.5% +130 -29 — 32.6% -1.02 5–3 (63%) 2–3 (40%) 103.3 -0.70 2003 1568 113.2 -2.11 -2.34 0.665 41.6% +3 -51 +44 41.7% -0.71 5–7 (42%) 6–4 (60%) 99.2 +1.02
29 2020 1535 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1496 110.5 +0.38 -0.09 1.027 50.9% +36 -67 +114 36.4% -0.95 7–6 (54%) 5–6 (45%) 99.3 +1.31
30 2021 1457 106.9 -0.29 -3.24 0.854 46.7% +105 — — 26.5% -1.44 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) 96.4 +0.65 2005 1613 122.1 -2.41 +0.28 0.934 48.6% -42 -142 +91 47.6% -0.21 8–11 (42%) 3–4 (43%) 100.0 -0.12
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1568 125.6 -2.28 +0.59 0.968 49.4% +22 -85 +99 43.4% -0.28 6–9 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 96.1 +0.78
32 2023 1420 94.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1472 114.0 -3.51 -1.24 0.880 47.3% +42 -2 +117 36.0% -1.19 3–8 (27%) 4–5 (44%) 95.0 -1.20
33 2024 1525 110.3 -2.16 -0.17 0.843 45.9% — — — 20.0% -1.00 0–1 0–1 — +0.02 2008 1571 125.0 -1.47 +1.80 1.013 50.2% +18 -32 — 47.7% 0.00 4–7 (36%) 7–8 (47%) 97.9 +0.82
34 2025 1576 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1591 120.2 -2.51 -0.54 0.914 48.2% +29 -121 — 39.5% -0.76 4–6 (40%) 2–3 (40%) 97.8 -0.89
35 2026 1556 106.9 +0.24 -2.27 0.918 47.9% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–2 — -0.20 2010 1546 110.5 -3.17 -1.80 0.858 46.7% +33 -58 -16 34.6% -1.23 5–5 (50%) 4–0 (100%) — +0.09
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1442 107.4 -4.00 -4.02 0.783 44.8% +81 0 — 30.0% -1.53 2–6 (25%) 0–1 — +0.38
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1449 101.1 -4.12 -1.62 0.786 44.7% +63 +2 — 38.1% -1.71 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 101.9 +0.05
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1451 96.4 -3.73 -1.77 0.738 42.8% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.02
Career — 1841 131.0 +0.87 -0.58 0.990 49.8% +28 -20 -126 47.5% -0.11 46–65 (41%) 47–51 (48%) 95.2 -1.43 — 1694 119.3 -2.71 -0.73 0.898 47.7% +18 -60 +55 40.2% -0.73 58–79 (42%) 41–43 (49%) 96.8 +0.80

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.