H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 22:32 UTC
Mona Barthel vs Petra Cetkovska H2H: 1-0
Mona Barthel holds a 1–0 lead over Petra Cetkovska in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mona Barthel leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mona Barthel won the 2012 Australian Open second round 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 36
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 41
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 20, 2012* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Mona Barthel | 7-5 6-3 | Petra Cetkovska | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mona Barthel | #223 | #23 | 1,762 | 1,841 | 151 | 179 | 45.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Petra Cetkovska | #954 | #25 | 1,955 | 1,761 | 73 | 81 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mona Barthel | Petra Cetkovska | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #195 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2011 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #69 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2012 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #39 | 1,682 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2013 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #34 | 1,646 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #104 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2014 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,712 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #83 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2015 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #45 | 1,672 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #149 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2016 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #158 | 1,555 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #143 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2017 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #48 | 1,600 | 0 | 4 | 2011 | 15–9 | 62.5% | #31 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2018 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #77 | 1,625 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #55 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2019 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #183 | 1,552 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #139 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #58 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2021 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #275 | 1,458 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #130 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #591 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #171 | 1,525 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #223 | 1,535 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |