H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Mona Barthel vs Vania King H2H: 0-1

Vania King holds a 1–0 lead over Mona Barthel in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Vania King leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Vania King won the 2016 Australian Open first round 3-6 7-5 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mona Barthel
Germany Age 36 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Vania King
USA Age 37 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Vania King #349 3-6 7-5 6-4 Mona Barthel #44 Match data Jan 20, 2016* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mona Barthel #205 #23 1,762 1,840 151 182 45.3% 0 0 0 1 3 4
Vania King #824 #50 1,225 1,767 128 160 44.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mona Barthel Vania King
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2005 1–1 50.0% #164 1,519 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2006 16–13 55.2% #60 1,662 0 1
18 — — — — — — — 2007 15–21 41.7% #109 1,625 0 1
19 2010 0–1 0.0% #195 1,493 0 0 2008 7–19 26.9% #128 1,519 0 1
20 2011 5–6 45.5% #69 1,552 0 0 2009 11–12 47.8% #80 1,591 0 1
21 2012 29–24 54.7% #39 1,682 0 1 2010 14–17 45.2% #86 1,597 0 1
22 2013 24–22 52.2% #34 1,646 0 2 2011 13–14 48.1% #76 1,691 0 1
23 2014 23–23 50.0% #42 1,713 0 3 2012 15–19 44.1% #69 1,617 0 1
24 2015 24–26 48.0% #45 1,670 0 3 2013 8–11 42.1% #85 1,631 0 1
25 2016 6–13 31.6% #158 1,560 0 3 2014 13–15 46.4% #111 1,650 0 1
26 2017 17–18 48.6% #48 1,602 0 4 2015 0–1 0.0% #410 1,634 0 1
27 2018 14–20 41.2% #77 1,625 0 4 2016 13–11 54.2% #78 1,646 0 1
28 2019 6–13 31.6% #183 1,549 0 4 2017 1–3 25.0% #492 1,593 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 2018 1–3 25.0% #356 1,560 0 1
30 2021 3–12 20.0% #275 1,457 0 4 — — — — — — —
33 2024 0–2 0.0% #171 1,525 0 4 — — — — — — —
35 2026 0–2 0.0% #205 1,556 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mona Barthel Vania King
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 15 10 25 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 11 14 25 44.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
19 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 5 12 17 29.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
20 2011 4 2 6 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2009 9 8 17 52.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
21 2012 21 14 35 60.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2010 9 10 19 47.4% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
22 2013 16 14 30 53.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 0 5 100.0% 2011 9 10 19 47.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 2014 11 14 25 44.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2012 12 13 25 48.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2015 18 16 34 52.9% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2013 6 8 14 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2016 4 8 12 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2014 7 8 15 46.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
26 2017 6 9 15 40.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 2015 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2018 8 12 20 40.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2016 10 9 19 52.6% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2019 5 5 10 50.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2017 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2021 3 8 11 27.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2024 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2026 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 96 104 200 48.0% 38 51 89 42.7% 10 25 35 28.6% 7 2 9 77.8% — 96 109 205 46.8% 26 36 62 41.9% 6 15 21 28.6% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 309/334 of Mona Barthel's and 237/288 of Vania King's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Mona Barthel Vania King
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 1/2 3.0 1.0 63.3% 52.6% 36.4% 50.0% 0.0% 46.7% 33.3%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 9/29 1.0 1.1 71.3% 60.7% 43.6% 55.0% 59.8% 55.8% 44.1%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 21/36 1.2 2.7 63.7% 58.9% 44.6% 48.9% 39.1% 54.0% 37.7%
19 2010 1/1 6.0 2.0 64.3% 66.7% 52.0% 60.0% 0.0% 61.4% 31.3% 2008 25/26 1.5 1.7 66.0% 61.8% 43.9% 51.8% 42.8% 55.6% 39.5%
20 2011 11/11 2.1 4.2 61.8% 63.6% 38.0% 50.5% 45.8% 53.6% 43.1% 2009 20/23 0.8 1.9 63.1% 58.0% 46.4% 47.2% 37.3% 53.7% 42.1%
21 2012 50/53 4.2 5.7 53.8% 70.4% 46.7% 53.9% 50.1% 59.2% 46.4% 2010 29/31 0.6 2.7 65.9% 61.5% 41.9% 49.4% 41.0% 55.1% 44.8%
22 2013 46/46 3.3 3.4 61.5% 66.4% 45.6% 56.9% 46.0% 58.5% 43.7% 2011 24/27 0.6 3.6 64.0% 59.5% 42.2% 53.5% 45.2% 53.2% 44.9%
23 2014 43/46 2.5 4.0 61.4% 64.9% 45.0% 55.3% 46.4% 57.1% 43.0% 2012 33/34 0.7 1.7 64.1% 62.4% 47.4% 51.5% 43.8% 57.0% 43.5%
24 2015 35/50 3.5 3.7 59.3% 64.0% 49.5% 47.1% 42.6% 58.1% 41.4% 2013 17/19 0.6 2.4 69.2% 57.3% 46.4% 44.7% 46.8% 53.7% 41.1%
25 2016 18/20 3.8 5.6 55.2% 66.7% 43.9% 50.0% 46.3% 56.8% 39.4% 2014 25/28 0.7 2.4 64.2% 58.6% 47.1% 50.6% 43.5% 54.3% 42.6%
26 2017 34/35 4.1 5.1 61.2% 65.8% 43.6% 53.5% 46.5% 56.9% 42.2% 2015 1/1 1.0 1.0 61.3% 55.3% 33.3% 16.7% 50.0% 46.8% 39.7%
27 2018 34/34 5.0 6.3 57.7% 66.0% 43.3% 56.9% 45.8% 56.3% 39.8% 2016 24/24 1.4 2.8 63.1% 64.2% 43.8% 58.8% 50.1% 56.6% 44.1%
28 2019 19/19 4.1 6.3 57.6% 67.5% 41.5% 48.3% 42.4% 56.3% 38.3% 2017 4/4 1.0 2.3 70.4% 50.1% 40.7% 56.3% 55.7% 48.5% 38.6%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 4/4 1.0 2.8 60.3% 52.3% 38.6% 54.3% 41.8% 47.0% 40.7%
30 2021 14/15 5.4 6.3 53.6% 68.6% 42.3% 49.5% 37.8% 56.5% 37.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2024 2/2 2.5 10.0 51.7% 54.0% 44.0% 14.3% 32.5% 49.3% 42.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2026 2/2 1.0 7.5 59.7% 62.5% 38.1% 53.3% 30.6% 52.6% 43.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 309/334 3.8 4.9 58.5% 66.4% 44.9% 52.9% 45.4% 57.4% 42.2% — 237/288 0.9 2.4 65.0% 60.2% 44.5% 51.2% 44.0% 54.7% 42.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mona Barthel Vania King
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1520 103.7 -0.64 +0.14 0.625 40.2% — — — 40.0% -1.00 1–0 — — -0.17
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1663 131.1 -1.06 -0.47 0.997 50.5% +24 — — 55.0% +0.35 3–5 (38%) 2–1 (67%) 99.5 -0.14
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1625 116.9 -1.39 -3.73 0.818 45.8% +17 -157 +16 43.0% -0.67 5–4 (56%) 7–4 (64%) 102.4 -1.23
19 2010 1493 100.8 +1.29 +0.85 0.810 47.0% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.14 2008 1519 117.6 +0.05 -3.22 0.890 47.7% +49 -52 — 33.9% -0.89 5–7 (42%) 1–5 (17%) 94.7 -1.09
20 2011 1552 119.1 -0.55 -0.55 0.929 48.7% +28 -19 — 45.8% -0.46 1–1 1–3 (25%) — -0.58 2009 1592 114.9 -1.54 -1.39 0.910 48.1% +21 -123 -33 44.9% -0.45 3–2 (60%) 2–2 (50%) 102.9 +0.36
21 2012 1682 144.4 +3.00 +2.35 1.139 52.8% +34 -50 -166 57.8% +0.69 3–11 (21%) 10–12 (45%) 92.9 -2.53 2010 1598 117.8 -1.20 +0.84 0.997 49.8% +24 -97 -78 49.3% -0.17 4–9 (31%) 1–4 (20%) 94.1 +0.43
22 2013 1646 138.9 +2.09 +0.25 1.053 51.1% +80 -90 -184 53.4% +0.41 6–7 (46%) 6–7 (46%) 97.5 -0.66 2011 1691 130.5 -1.09 +0.98 0.960 48.9% -18 -128 — 48.4% -0.17 5–5 (50%) 4–4 (50%) 101.8 -1.31
23 2014 1713 124.3 +1.01 -0.81 1.002 50.2% -62 -24 -158 50.5% -0.09 5–6 (45%) 6–4 (60%) 101.5 -0.80 2012 1618 128.3 +0.93 +0.08 1.011 50.1% +21 -46 — 48.0% -0.05 3–6 (33%) 5–3 (63%) 99.5 -1.01
24 2015 1671 128.2 -0.49 -0.40 0.986 49.6% +10 -45 — 51.7% +0.24 10–14 (42%) 10–10 (50%) 96.5 +2.15 2013 1631 118.3 -0.91 -1.79 0.887 47.5% +1 -43 — 41.7% -0.79 6–4 (60%) 3–3 (50%) 103.1 -0.53
25 2016 1561 109.3 +0.53 -2.53 0.913 48.2% +29 +35 -55 37.8% -0.73 1–4 (20%) 2–1 (67%) 96.5 -0.82 2014 1650 125.5 -1.58 -0.66 0.932 48.6% +18 -55 -202 49.2% -0.07 7–4 (64%) 3–2 (60%) 105.8 -1.14
26 2017 1602 121.9 +0.49 -0.40 0.977 49.6% -11 +63 -97 48.8% -0.34 6–8 (43%) 6–2 (75%) 100.9 -0.52 2015 1635 102.3 +0.69 -0.52 0.746 43.2% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.02
27 2018 1625 120.7 -0.13 -2.87 0.910 48.2% +7 -36 -60 42.2% -0.52 8–7 (53%) 3–4 (43%) 102.3 -0.60 2016 1646 125.1 +0.57 +0.85 1.016 50.3% +12 -20 — 53.7% +0.11 3–3 (50%) 5–2 (71%) 102.4 +0.71
28 2019 1550 122.1 -0.64 -2.56 0.876 47.5% +130 -29 — 32.6% -1.02 5–3 (63%) 2–3 (40%) 103.3 -0.70 2017 1593 108.4 -1.97 -0.89 0.750 44.4% +4 — — 37.5% -0.50 1–1 — — -0.16
29 2020 1535 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1560 104.4 -2.66 -1.04 0.768 44.2% +6 — — 25.0% -2.25 — 1–0 — +0.17
30 2021 1457 106.9 -0.29 -3.24 0.854 46.7% +105 — — 26.5% -1.44 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) 96.4 +0.65 2019 1541 97.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2023 1420 94.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2024 1525 110.3 -2.16 -0.17 0.843 45.9% — — — 20.0% -1.00 0–1 0–1 — +0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2025 1576 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2026 1556 106.9 +0.24 -2.27 0.918 47.9% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–2 — -0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1841 131.0 +0.87 -0.58 0.990 49.8% +28 -20 -126 47.5% -0.11 46–65 (41%) 47–51 (48%) 95.2 -1.43 — 1767 127.9 -0.67 -0.74 0.935 48.6% +17 -80 -68 46.2% -0.31 46–50 (48%) 34–30 (53%) 104.0 -1.80

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.