H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC

Mona Barthel vs Venus Williams H2H: 0-4

Venus Williams holds a 4–0 lead over Mona Barthel in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Venus Williams leads 4–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Venus Williams won the 2019 Indian Wells fourth round 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mona Barthel
GER Age 36 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0 – 4
4 main draw meetings
Venus Williams
USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 13, 2019* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R16 Hard Venus Williams #36 6-4 6-4 Mona Barthel #97 Match data
Jan 24, 2017* Australian Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Venus Williams #17 6-3 7-5 Mona Barthel #181 Match data
Sep 25, 2013* Tokyo WTA 1000 R64 Hard Venus Williams #63 6-3 6-1 Mona Barthel #34 Match data
Oct 19, 2012* Luxembourg WTA 250 R16 Hard Venus Williams #41 7-6(4) 6-4 Mona Barthel #37 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mona Barthel #223 #23 1,762 1,841 151 179 45.8% 0 0 0 1 3 4
Venus Williams #467 #1 7,452 2,362 768 288 72.7% 7 9 1 20 10 47

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mona Barthel Venus Williams
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1994 1–1 50.0% — 1,525 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,571 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,851 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1998 50–13 79.4% #5 2,094 0 2
19 2010 0–1 0.0% #195 1,492 0 0 1999 57–11 83.8% #3 2,258 0 8
20 2011 5–6 45.5% #69 1,551 0 0 2000 35–4 89.7% #3 2,321 2 13
21 2012 29–23 55.8% #39 1,682 0 1 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,338 4 19
22 2013 24–22 52.2% #34 1,646 0 2 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,297 4 26
23 2014 23–23 50.0% #42 1,712 0 3 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,257 4 27
24 2015 24–26 48.0% #45 1,672 0 3 2004 40–13 75.5% #9 2,072 4 29
25 2016 6–13 31.6% #158 1,555 0 3 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,085 5 31
26 2017 17–18 48.6% #48 1,600 0 4 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,007 5 31
27 2018 14–20 41.2% #77 1,625 0 4 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,048 6 34
28 2019 6–13 31.6% #183 1,552 0 4 2008 37–10 78.7% #6 2,133 7 37
29 — — — — — — — 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,981 7 39
30 2021 3–11 21.4% #275 1,458 0 4 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,057 7 41
31 — — — — — — — 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 1,994 7 41
32 — — — — — — — 2012 22–8 73.3% #24 2,007 7 42
33 2024 0–2 0.0% #171 1,525 0 4 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,889 7 42
34 — — — — — — — 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,874 7 43
35 2026 0–1 0.0% #223 1,535 0 4 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,957 7 46
36 — — — — — — — 2016 24–14 63.2% #17 1,830 7 47
37 — — — — — — — 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,935 7 47
38 — — — — — — — 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,867 7 47
39 — — — — — — — 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,827 7 47
40 — — — — — — — 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,717 7 47
41 — — — — — — — 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,649 7 47
42 — — — — — — — 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,603 7 47
43 — — — — — — — 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,594 7 47