H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Mona Guerrant vs Kate Latham H2H: 0-2

Kate Latham holds a 2–0 lead over Mona Guerrant in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kate Latham leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kate Latham won the 1980 Berkeley final 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mona Guerrant
USA Age 77 Right-Handed
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Kate Latham
USA Age 73

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kate Latham 6-2 6-4 Mona Guerrant Match data May 6, 1980* F Berkeley WTA 250 —
Kate Latham 6-3 6-1 Mona Guerrant Match data Oct 3, 1974* R32 Houston WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mona Guerrant — — — 1,941 122 116 51.3% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Kate Latham — — — 1,864 198 202 49.5% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mona Guerrant Kate Latham
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1970 1–3 25.0% — 1,475 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1972 3–3 50.0% — 1,502 0 0
20 1969 1–1 50.0% — 1,500 0 0 1973 6–7 46.2% — 1,587 0 0
21 1970 1–2 33.3% — 1,504 0 0 1974 40–16 71.4% — 1,828 0 3
22 1971 3–8 27.3% — 1,517 0 0 1975 15–20 42.9% — 1,684 0 3
23 1972 28–22 56.0% — 1,733 0 1 1976 4–2 66.7% — 1,676 0 3
24 1973 17–19 47.2% — 1,780 0 2 1977 15–12 55.6% — 1,748 0 3
25 1974 12–14 46.2% — 1,779 0 2 1978 13–17 43.3% — 1,660 0 3
26 1975 12–12 50.0% — 1,905 0 2 1979 21–23 47.7% — 1,852 0 3
27 1976 15–14 51.7% — 1,898 0 2 1980 23–22 51.1% — 1,748 0 4
28 1977 14–9 60.9% — 1,890 0 2 1981 21–20 51.2% — 1,774 0 5
29 1978 5–11 31.2% — 1,808 0 2 1982 24–28 46.2% — 1,684 0 5
30 — — — — — — — 1983 9–16 36.0% — 1,623 0 6
31 1980 14–4 77.8% — 1,812 0 3 1984 0–11 0.0% — 1,492 0 6
32 — — — — — — — 1985 3–1 75.0% — 1,526 0 6

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mona Guerrant Kate Latham
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1969 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1973 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% — — — —
21 1970 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1974 15 5 20 75.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 17 6 23 73.9% 0 3 3 0.0%
22 1971 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 1975 3 5 8 37.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0%
23 1972 4 3 7 57.1% 9 8 17 52.9% 14 9 23 60.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 1976 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1973 3 4 7 42.9% 7 7 14 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 4 9 55.6% 1977 4 4 8 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1974 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 1978 1 3 4 25.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 6 11 45.5%
26 1975 4 4 8 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1979 8 7 15 53.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 10 16 37.5%
27 1976 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 8 8 16 50.0% 1980 9 8 17 52.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 9 12 25.0%
28 1977 2 2 4 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1981 8 7 15 53.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 10 16 37.5%
29 1978 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 1982 9 7 16 56.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 5 7 12 41.7% 7 9 16 43.8%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 6 8 14 42.9% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
31 1980 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1984 0 4 4 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
Career — 16 21 37 43.2% 31 31 62 50.0% 32 29 61 52.5% 31 32 63 49.2% — 70 67 137 51.1% 26 38 64 40.6% 41 33 74 55.4% 27 55 82 32.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mona Guerrant Kate Latham
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 1489 99.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.07
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1476 93.6 — — — — +10 — — 25.0% -2.63 — — — +0.42
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 1503 99.9 — — — — — +39 — 45.5% -0.54 0–1 — — +0.62
20 1969 1500 92.5 — — — — — — — 40.0% -2.40 1–0 — — +0.28 1973 1587 129.0 — — — — -41 — 0 48.3% +0.14 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.26
21 1970 1504 106.4 — — — — — +14 — 42.9% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.10 1974 1828 140.0 — — — — -65 -181 -31 68.9% +1.55 6–8 (43%) 4–4 (50%) 99.0 +3.26
22 1971 1517 118.6 — — — — — +38 +14 35.7% -0.75 2–4 (33%) 0–3 (0%) 95.8 0.00 1975 1685 132.9 — — — — +12 -76 — 45.3% -0.03 1–4 (20%) 1–7 (13%) 89.6 -0.75
23 1972 1734 136.4 — — — — -121 -79 -58 56.3% +0.56 8–11 (42%) 5–0 (100%) 103.8 +0.32 1976 1676 107.6 — — — — +22 — — 57.1% +1.00 2–0 1–0 — +2.30
24 1973 1781 144.7 — — — — -54 -77 -115 48.8% -0.15 3–5 (38%) 2–2 (50%) 99.8 -3.77 1977 1749 140.9 — — — — -7 -119 — 54.2% +0.34 3–4 (43%) 4–1 (80%) 103.9 -0.90
25 1974 1779 137.0 — — — — -26 -97 -75 50.9% +0.11 1–4 (20%) 3–4 (43%) 97.1 -1.56 1978 1661 118.3 — — — — +8 -10 +69 43.3% -0.58 6–3 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 105.3 +2.03
26 1975 1906 154.1 — — — — -52 -116 — 48.2% -0.13 5–3 (63%) 2–4 (33%) 103.0 -3.85 1979 1852 149.5 — — — — -20 -164 -96 45.5% -0.29 8–7 (53%) 4–4 (50%) 102.4 -2.22
27 1976 1898 149.2 — — — — -30 — -110 55.9% +0.57 2–8 (20%) 2–5 (29%) 93.6 -2.51 1980 1749 133.1 — — — — -30 — +16 51.5% +0.05 5–10 (33%) 7–4 (64%) 96.7 -1.81
28 1977 1890 136.0 — — — — -64 -47 -93 57.7% +0.69 4–4 (50%) 3–1 (75%) 100.8 -0.54 1981 1774 142.7 — — — — -17 — +6 52.1% +0.14 5–7 (42%) 6–5 (55%) 97.1 -1.96
29 1978 1809 135.5 — — — — -44 -17 — 35.9% -0.87 3–4 (43%) 0–3 (0%) — -2.29 1982 1685 128.0 — — — — +51 -102 +34 44.5% -0.56 10–5 (67%) 5–2 (71%) 106.2 -0.31
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1624 115.0 — — — — +51 -49 +71 40.3% -0.61 7–9 (44%) 3–6 (33%) 96.8 +0.84
31 1980 1812 138.2 — — — — -108 — — 73.8% +2.26 4–2 (67%) 1–0 — +0.36 1984 1492 91.5 — — — — +52 +30 — 8.3% -3.08 0–2 0–1 — +0.50
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1527 102.8 — — — — — — — 60.0% +0.40 2–0 1–0 — +0.05
Career — 1942 149.0 — — — — -53 -61 -71 52.5% +0.27 33–46 (42%) 18–22 (45%) 98.6 -5.68 — 1864 138.0 — — — — -3 -77 -8 49.1% -0.03 56–62 (47%) 41–38 (52%) 100.8 +0.44

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.