H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Mona Guerrant vs Pam Teeguarden H2H: 2-2

Mona Guerrant and Pam Teeguarden are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Mona Guerrant leads 1–0 on carpet, while Pam Teeguarden leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mona Guerrant won the 1980 Tucson round of 16 6-4 7-6 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mona Guerrant
USA Age 77 Right-Handed
H2H
2 – 2
4 main-draw meetings
Pam Teeguarden
USA Age 75 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mona Guerrant 6-4 7-6 6-0 Pam Teeguarden Match data Dec 19, 1980* R16 Tucson WTA 250 Carpet
Mona Guerrant 6-4 3-6 6-2 Pam Teeguarden Match data Sep 23, 1972* R16 Albany WTA 250 Hard
Pam Teeguarden 6-4 6-4 Mona Guerrant Match data Sep 5, 1972* R32 US Open Grand Slam Grass
Pam Teeguarden 3-6 6-4 7-5 Mona Guerrant Match data Jul 15, 1972* QF Gstaad WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mona Guerrant — — — 1,941 122 116 51.3% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Pam Teeguarden — — — 1,922 246 297 45.3% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mona Guerrant Pam Teeguarden
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1968 12–17 41.4% — 1,488 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1969 5–11 31.2% — 1,493 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1970 19–19 50.0% — 1,612 0 1
20 1969 1–1 50.0% — 1,500 0 0 1971 17–21 44.7% — 1,679 0 1
21 1970 1–2 33.3% — 1,504 0 0 1972 31–25 55.4% — 1,868 0 1
22 1971 3–8 27.3% — 1,517 0 0 1973 22–23 48.9% — 1,839 0 1
23 1972 28–22 56.0% — 1,733 0 1 1974 22–18 55.0% — 1,901 0 3
24 1973 17–19 47.2% — 1,780 0 2 1975 21–25 45.7% — 1,816 0 3
25 1974 12–14 46.2% — 1,779 0 2 1976 7–14 33.3% — 1,779 0 3
26 1975 12–12 50.0% — 1,905 0 2 1977 14–20 41.2% — 1,762 0 3
27 1976 15–14 51.7% — 1,898 0 2 1978 11–19 36.7% — 1,723 0 3
28 1977 14–9 60.9% — 1,890 0 2 1979 13–19 40.6% — 1,746 0 3
29 1978 5–11 31.2% — 1,808 0 2 1980 17–16 51.5% — 1,802 0 3
30 — — — — — — — 1981 20–19 51.3% — 1,789 0 4
31 1980 14–4 77.8% — 1,812 0 3 1982 3–10 23.1% — 1,682 0 4
32 — — — — — — — 1983 4–6 40.0% — 1,651 0 4
33 — — — — — — — 1984 8–11 42.1% — 1,615 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 1985 0–4 0.0% — 1,587 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mona Guerrant Pam Teeguarden
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 6 5 11 54.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 1 1 2 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 7 3 10 70.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 5 8 13 38.5% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1969 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1971 3 2 5 60.0% 10 12 22 45.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1970 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1972 3 3 6 50.0% 13 9 22 59.1% 15 6 21 71.4% 0 7 7 0.0%
22 1971 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 1973 5 4 9 55.6% 7 8 15 46.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 6 8 25.0%
23 1972 4 3 7 57.1% 9 8 17 52.9% 14 9 23 60.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 1974 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 6 7 13 46.2%
24 1973 3 4 7 42.9% 7 7 14 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 4 9 55.6% 1975 2 5 7 28.6% 14 10 24 58.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 8 9 11.1%
25 1974 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 8 12 33.3%
26 1975 4 4 8 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1977 2 4 6 33.3% 6 7 13 46.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
27 1976 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 8 8 16 50.0% 1978 2 7 9 22.2% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 5 7 28.6%
28 1977 2 2 4 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1979 5 6 11 45.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 7 10 30.0%
29 1978 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 1980 6 5 11 54.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 6 12 50.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1 5 6 16.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 9 15 40.0%
31 1980 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 6 6 0.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 5 4 9 55.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 16 21 37 43.2% 31 31 62 50.0% 32 29 61 52.5% 31 32 63 49.2% — 57 66 123 46.3% 70 82 152 46.1% 75 65 140 53.6% 36 83 119 30.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mona Guerrant Pam Teeguarden
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 1489 104.8 — — — — +4 -5 +11 45.0% -0.33 1–5 (17%) — — -0.27
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 1494 104.2 — — — — — -42 +25 36.1% -1.11 1–3 (25%) — — -0.40
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1613 133.6 — — — — +18 -130 -29 52.9% +0.58 2–9 (18%) 0–1 — -0.45
20 1969 1500 92.5 — — — — — — — 40.0% -2.40 1–0 — — +0.28 1971 1679 136.1 — — — — +4 -80 -95 47.1% +0.06 3–6 (33%) 0–2 — -0.97
21 1970 1504 106.4 — — — — — +14 — 42.9% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.10 1972 1868 151.0 — — — — -247 -107 -5 55.4% +0.26 4–9 (31%) 1–1 — -7.18
22 1971 1517 118.6 — — — — — +38 +14 35.7% -0.75 2–4 (33%) 0–3 (0%) 95.8 0.00 1973 1839 149.0 — — — — -139 -96 +71 50.5% -0.06 6–9 (40%) 4–4 (50%) 100.2 -9.05
23 1972 1734 136.4 — — — — -121 -79 -58 56.3% +0.56 8–11 (42%) 5–0 (100%) 103.8 +0.32 1974 1902 145.5 — — — — -77 -170 +7 52.8% +0.33 6–3 (67%) 3–1 (75%) — -4.34
24 1973 1781 144.7 — — — — -54 -77 -115 48.8% -0.15 3–5 (38%) 2–2 (50%) 99.8 -3.77 1975 1817 144.3 — — — — -102 +1 +94 46.8% -0.11 8–9 (47%) 6–6 (50%) 99.4 -4.08
25 1974 1779 137.0 — — — — -26 -97 -75 50.9% +0.11 1–4 (20%) 3–4 (43%) 97.1 -1.56 1976 1779 135.2 — — — — -111 -7 +168 38.0% -1.00 3–5 (38%) — — -3.53
26 1975 1906 154.1 — — — — -52 -116 — 48.2% -0.13 5–3 (63%) 2–4 (33%) 103.0 -3.85 1977 1763 141.5 — — — — -105 0 +158 41.4% -0.63 3–3 (50%) 4–7 (36%) 98.3 -3.44
27 1976 1898 149.2 — — — — -30 — -110 55.9% +0.57 2–8 (20%) 2–5 (29%) 93.6 -2.51 1978 1724 122.7 — — — — -143 -12 +180 36.8% -0.90 5–5 (50%) 3–6 (33%) 97.4 -2.11
28 1977 1890 136.0 — — — — -64 -47 -93 57.7% +0.69 4–4 (50%) 3–1 (75%) 100.8 -0.54 1979 1746 144.0 — — — — -120 -19 +184 42.7% -0.37 5–6 (45%) 4–7 (36%) 99.3 -1.56
29 1978 1809 135.5 — — — — -44 -17 — 35.9% -0.87 3–4 (43%) 0–3 (0%) — -2.29 1980 1802 134.4 — — — — -98 -69 +93 48.1% -0.16 7–6 (54%) 3–4 (43%) 101.0 -1.72
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1789 134.6 — — — — -128 -12 +88 52.2% +0.34 6–8 (43%) 3–4 (43%) 97.5 -0.17
31 1980 1812 138.2 — — — — -108 — — 73.8% +2.26 4–2 (67%) 1–0 — +0.36 1982 1683 118.4 — — — — -148 — +191 31.3% -1.16 2–4 (33%) 0–1 — +0.19
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1652 106.0 — — — — -83 +79 — 45.8% -0.13 1–3 (25%) 2–3 (40%) 96.0 +0.80
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1615 107.2 — — — — -38 +70 +200 40.9% -0.93 4–2 (67%) 3–1 (75%) 105.0 +1.32
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1588 113.3 — — — — -40 — — 11.1% -2.78 0–1 0–1 — -0.53
Career — 1942 149.0 — — — — -53 -61 -71 52.5% +0.27 33–46 (42%) 18–22 (45%) 98.6 -5.68 — 1923 143.0 — — — — -97 -51 +59 46.5% -0.19 67–96 (41%) 36–49 (42%) 93.3 -6.98

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.