H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Mona Guerrant vs Renata Tomanova H2H: 2-2
Mona Guerrant and Renata Tomanova are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Renata Tomanova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Renata Tomanova won the 1977 Dallas fourth round 3-6 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 77
Right-Handed
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
Age 71
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 1977* | Dallas | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Renata Tomanova | 3-6 6-1 6-3 | Mona Guerrant | Match data |
| Jun 16, 1976* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Mona Guerrant | 6-4 6-1 | Renata Tomanova | Match data |
| Feb 26, 1976* | Sarasota | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Mona Guerrant | 6-3 6-2 | Renata Tomanova | Match data |
| Jun 7, 1973* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Renata Tomanova | 5-7 6-3 6-1 | Mona Guerrant | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mona Guerrant | — | — | — | 1,939 | 123 | 117 | 51.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Renata Tomanova | — | — | — | 1,940 | 225 | 214 | 51.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mona Guerrant | Renata Tomanova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 20–15 | 57.1% | — | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 21–14 | 60.0% | — | 1,692 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | 1969 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 23–16 | 59.0% | — | 1,804 | 0 | 6 |
| 21 | 1970 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,840 | 0 | 8 |
| 22 | 1971 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 28–26 | 51.9% | — | 1,854 | 0 | 9 |
| 23 | 1972 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 28–25 | 52.8% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 9 |
| 24 | 1973 | 17–19 | 47.2% | — | 1,780 | 0 | 2 | 1979 | 21–26 | 44.7% | — | 1,692 | 0 | 9 |
| 25 | 1974 | 12–14 | 46.2% | — | 1,767 | 0 | 2 | 1980 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,679 | 0 | 9 |
| 26 | 1975 | 12–12 | 50.0% | — | 1,897 | 0 | 2 | 1981 | 18–16 | 52.9% | — | 1,682 | 0 | 9 |
| 27 | 1976 | 15–14 | 51.7% | — | 1,893 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 9–12 | 42.9% | — | 1,694 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | 1977 | 14–9 | 60.9% | — | 1,886 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,598 | 0 | 9 |
| 29 | 1978 | 5–11 | 31.2% | — | 1,804 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,582 | 0 | 9 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,570 | 0 | 9 |
| 31 | 1980 | 14–4 | 77.8% | — | 1,809 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 9 |