H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Monica Puig vs Flavia Pennetta H2H: 0-1
Flavia Pennetta holds a 1–0 lead over Monica Puig in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Flavia Pennetta leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Flavia Pennetta won the 2014 Australian Open second round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
PUR
Age 32
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 44
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 2014* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Flavia Pennetta | 6-3 6-4 | Monica Puig | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Monica Puig | #1,073 | #27 | 1,570 | 1,838 | 128 | 136 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Flavia Pennetta | #15 | #6 | 3,621 | 1,982 | 418 | 272 | 60.6% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Monica Puig | Flavia Pennetta | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #211 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #124 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2013 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #56 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2014 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #59 | 1,616 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #95 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2015 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #92 | 1,579 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #69 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2016 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #32 | 1,713 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #38 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2017 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #58 | 1,709 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #23 | 1,777 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2018 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #53 | 1,775 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #28 | 1,729 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2019 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #79 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #39 | 1,768 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #105 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 50–23 | 68.5% | #13 | 1,900 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 52–23 | 69.3% | #12 | 1,902 | 0 | 8 |
| 28 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1073 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #24 | 1,847 | 0 | 9 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #20 | 1,785 | 0 | 9 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #45 | 1,735 | 0 | 9 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #31 | 1,745 | 0 | 9 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #12 | 1,780 | 0 | 10 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #8 | 1,823 | 1 | 11 |