H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Monica Puig vs Irina Falconi Hartman H2H: 0-1
Irina Falconi Hartman holds a 1–0 lead over Monica Puig in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Irina Falconi Hartman leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Irina Falconi Hartman won the 2015 Miami first round 7-6(9) 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
PUR
Age 32
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 24, 2015* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Irina Falconi Hartman | 7-6(9) 7-6(3) | Monica Puig | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Monica Puig | #1,073 | #27 | 1,570 | 1,838 | 128 | 136 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Irina Falconi Hartman | #1,008 | #63 | 1,005 | 1,614 | 42 | 72 | 36.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Monica Puig | Irina Falconi Hartman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #211 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #124 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #84 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #56 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #151 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #59 | 1,616 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #144 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #92 | 1,579 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #112 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #32 | 1,713 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #76 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #58 | 1,709 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #99 | 1,560 | 0 | 1 |
| 2018 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #53 | 1,775 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #129 | 1,497 | 0 | 1 |
| 2019 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #79 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #271 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 |
| 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #105 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1073 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |